DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_21
Cite As:
Morton, A & Merz, R 2024, 'enviroMETS Lighthouse Projects: a strategic pathway to high-value sustainable post-mining land use', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds),
Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 295-308,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_21
Abstract:
This paper presents an overview of the enviroMETS (Qld) Lighthouse Projects (LHP) initiative, which aims to find innovative and sustainable ways to make mining-impacted land valuable to its current and future custodians. The evolving LHP strategy outlines the overall approach and objectives in delivering societal, economic, and environmental stakeholder outcomes by shining a light on what can be achieved. The project principles, derived from collaborative and inclusive planning, emphasise the importance of leveraging the innovation ecosystem, leading the mining equipment, technology and services (METS) sector and quantifying non-financial value.
The key challenges and research priorities of the LHP initiative were identified through a perception survey and online member poll which made clear that technological developments could only be pursued with a clarified regulatory authorisation pathway, and the availability of a multi-factor business case for viable public/private investment. A later survey confirmed the LHP strategy to develop multiple pilot sites was on track and sound.
The paper discusses the outcomes that can be achieved through collaboration, including generating ongoing funds for site rehabilitation, identifying viable business cases and creating sustainable economic development. Additionally, the paper explores the potential for nature-positive outcomes, local employment generation and reduced regulatory hurdles associated with rehabilitation opportunities.
The LHP initiative consists of three investigative research projects: regulatory pathway mapping, post-mining land use business case methodology and the development of investible pilot sites. These projects navigate the regulatory framework impacting economic transformation, develop a reliable methodology for assessing the net best value of post-mining land use options and establish pilot sites to prove new innovative economic purposes. The paper highlights the progress made in each of these projects and the importance of collaboration with stakeholders, including government agencies, mining operators and regional communities.
The paper concludes by discussing the strategic steps necessary for the establishment of multiple pilot sites across Queensland and the attraction of investors for remaining and repurposed mining land.
Keywords: post-mining land use; regulatory pathways; sustainable communities; regional development; business case; pilot sites; technological innovation.
References:
Clay, M, Nicolson, L, Dunlop, J & Purtill, J 2024, A Review of Research and Tools for Grazing as a Post-Mining Landuse in Queensland: Technical Paper, Office of the Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner, Brisbane.
Côte, CM, Holloway, E, Dunlop, J & Chrystal, R 2023, Leading Practice Approaches to Select Post-Mining Land Uses for Residual Mine Voids: Technical Paper, Office of the Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner, Brisbane.
CSIRO 2023, Enabling Mine Closure and Transitions: Opportunities for Australian Industry, prepared for CRC TiME, Canberra.
Department of Industry, Innovation and Science 2016, Mine Rehabilitation Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry, Canberra.
Department of Regional NSW 2023, Practical Guide: Post Mining Land Use, Sydney.
Finucane, SJ & Tarnowy, K 2019, ‘New uses for old infrastructure: 101 things to do with the ‘stuff’ next to the hole in the ground’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 479–496,
Foran, T, Barber, M & Ackermann, F 2022, Understanding the Values of Stakeholders in Australian Post-Mining Economies, CRC TiME Limited, Perth.
Heyward, B 2023, Lighthouse Project 1: Post-Mining-Land-Use – Regulatory and Industry Practices, enviroMETS, Brisbane.
Ippolito, J 2024, Further Studies - Strategic Regional Planning to Guide PMLU Options, enviroMETS, Brisbane (unpublished).
Measham, T, Walker, J, Haslam McKenzie, F, Kirby, J, Williams, C, D'Urso, J, Littleboy, A, Samper, A, … Boggs, G 2024, ‘Beyond closure: A literature review and research agenda for post-mining transitions’, Resources Policy, vol. 90.
Mudd, G 2018, The McArthur River Project: The Environmental Case for Complete Pit Backfill, The Mineral Policy Institute,
Pearman, G 2009, 101 Things to Do With a Hole in the Ground, Post-Mining Alliance and the Eden Project, Bodelva.
Porter, ME 1998, ‘Clusters and the new economics of competition’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 77–90.
Queensland Government 1994, Environmental Protection Act 1994, Brisbane.
Queensland Treasury 2024, About the Queensland Economy, viewed 3 August 2024,
Whitbread-Arbrutat, P & Lowe, R 2024, 102 Things to Do With a Hole in the Ground, Eden Project, Bodelva.
Worden, S, Côte, C, Svobodova, K, Arratia-Solar, A, Everingham, J, Asmussen, P, Edraki, M & Erskine, P 2021, Baseline Works for Mine Rehabilitation and Closure Collaboration Project, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Worden, S, Svobodova, K, Côte, C & Bolz, P 2024, Regional Post-Mining Land Use Assessment: an Interdisciplinary and Multi-Stakeholder Approach, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.