Authors: Ardito, C; Hugman, R; Persico, A; Sigda, J

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_25

Cite As:
Ardito, C, Hugman, R, Persico, A & Sigda, J 2024, 'Nuclear power renaissance and the challenge of closing legacy uranium mine and mill sites', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 351-362, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_25

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
With the growing concern about climate change and its projected impacts around the world, nuclear power working together with renewable energy sources can enable countries to move away from dependence on fossil fuels and achieve their net zero carbon emission targets (International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] 2021). A wealth of evidence demonstrates that bringing on more nuclear power capability is a key part of reaching net zero emission goals, coupled with changing public perception to recognise the positive outcomes of nuclear power generation. Uranium mining will be crucial to supporting this anticipated growth in nuclear power projects in response to energy needs. The legacy of uranium mining and milling sets a negative undercurrent to this opportunity. Modern mining practices, strict environmental regulations, and increased demand for a responsibly sourced supply chain have helped to advance the science; to show that uranium can be recovered with minimal impacts to human health and the environment. Modern development of nuclear power generation will be met with challenges resulting from public perception that comes from known historical impacts to soil and groundwater at legacy sites, which are currently being addressed, but will take many more years to resolve. Progress towards closure is being made at several of these sites because of improved site characterisation techniques, state-of-the-art geochemical and predictive modelling evaluations, and regular collaboration with key decision-makers. Resolving the negative effects of the uranium legacy will be a critical step in realising the economic opportunities related to a potential ‘nuclear power renaissance.’ Overcoming the negative legacy of uranium mining is essential for a successful nuclear power renaissance and can be addressed through communicating and demonstrating responsible practices and building trust with stakeholders. This paper discusses some of the challenges faced during closure of uranium mine and mill sites and provide some examples from the United States where these challenges have been tackled, demonstrating that they are surmountable.

Keywords: uranium, mining, nuclear power, climate change

References:
Anderson, OJ 1981, Abandoned or Inactive Uranium Mines in New Mexico, New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources,
Bear, JJ & Cheng, HDA 2010, ‘Optimization, inverse, and management tools’, Modeling Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 693–756.
Boice, JD, Cohen, SS, Mumma, MT, Chadda, B & Blot, WJ 2008, ‘A cohort study of uranium millers and miners of Grants, New Mexico, 1979–2005’, Journal of Radiological Protection, vol. 28, no. 3,
Coulon, C, White, JT, Pryet, A, Gatel, L & Lemieux, J 2024a, ‘An ensemble-based approach for pumping optimization in an island aquifer considering parameter, observation and climate uncertainty’, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1,
pp. 303–319,
Coulon, C, Markovich, K, Miller, S, White, J, Askar, A, Beal, L, ... Ardito, C 2024b, ‘Determining the value of future data acquisition in the context of multi-objective remediation optimization’, Proceedings of the 51st International Association of Hydrogeologists World Groundwater Congress, International Association of Hydrogeologists, Reading.
de Sousa, E 2023, ‘Optimisation of prediction-driven field investigation programmes using data space inversion and PESTPP-MOU’, in The Second PEST Conference: The Path from Data to Decisions, INTERA, Austin,
2023/03/PEST-Conference_Presentation-Abstracts.pdf
Eadie, GG & Kaufmann, RF 1977, ‘Radiological evaluation of the effects of uranium mining and milling operations on selected
ground water supplies in the grants mineral belt, New Mexico’, Health Physics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 231–241, viewed June 2024,
Geofirma Engineering Ltd. & INTERA Inc. 2011, nSIGHTS, computer software, INTERA Inc.
Gillette, J 2024, ‘City, nuclear tech company explore possibility of building reactors in Gillette’, Wyoming Tribune Eagle, 12 February 2024, viewed June 2024,
Goodfellow, MJ, Williams, HR & Azapagic, A 2011, ‘Nuclear renaissance, public perception and design criteria: an exploratory review’, Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 10,
Gordon, C 2024, ‘ChatGPT and generative AI innovations are creating sustainability havoc’, Forbes, viewed June 2024,
Guidolin, M & Guseo, R 2012, ‘A nuclear power renaissance?’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 79, no. 9,
pp. 1746–1760,
He, J, Sarma, P, Bhark, E, Tanaka, S, Wen, X & Kamath, J 2018, ‘Quantifying expected uncertainty reduction and value of information using ensemble-variance analysis’, SPE Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 428–448,
Hugman, R, Coulon, C, Zwinger, J & de Sousa, E 2024, ‘More bang for buck: optimization of prediction- driven monitoring programs’, Proceedings of the 51st International Association of Hydrogeologists World Groundwater Congress, International Association of Hydrogeologists, Reading.
International Atomic Energy Agency 2021, Nuclear Energy for a Net Zero World, Vienna, viewed 4 June 2024,
Kaufmann, RF, Eadie, GG & Russel, CR,1976, ‘Effects of uranium mining and milling on ground water in the Grants Mineral Belt, New Mexico’, Groundwater, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 296–308,
Linton, R 2024, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Information Public Meeting with a question-and-answer session: Homestake Mining Co. of California (HMC), Grants Reclamation Project, Grants, NM: US Department of Energy (DOE), Bluewater Disposal Site, presentation, US Department of Energy,
Lowy Institute 2024, Lowy Institute Poll 2024 Report: Climate Change and Energy, June 3 2024, viewed 8 June 2024,
Markovich, K, Coulon, C, Hugman, R & White, J 2024, ‘Reliability-based optimization of an open pit mine dewatering system to support sustainable water management’, MODFLOW and More 2024: AI, Global Change, and the Future of Groundwater Modeling, Integrated GroundWater Modeling Center, Princeton University, Princeton.
McDermott, J 2024, In Wyoming, Bill Gates Moves Ahead with Nuclear Project Aimed at Revolutionizing Power Generation, Associated Press, 15 August 2024, viewed 17 October 2024,
McLemore, VT, Hill, B, Khalsa, N & Lucas Kamat, SA 2013, ‘Uranium resources in the Grants Uranium District, New Mexico: An update’, in Zeigler, JM Timmons, STimmons & S Semken (eds), New Mexico Geological Society 64th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, New Mexico Geological Society, pp. 117–126,
documents/mclemore13.pdf
Office of Nuclear Energy 2021, Advantages and Challenges of Nuclear Energy, US Department of Energy, viewed 5 June 2024,
Rajkotwalla, M 2024, ‘Can US uranium renaissance dispell ghosts of the past?’, Mining Magazine, viewed 7 June 2024,
Robertson, A & Shaw, S 2004, ‘Use of multiple accounts analysis process for sustainability optimization’, presented at 2004 SME Annual Meeting, Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Littleton.
New Mexico Environment Department 2010, Geochemical analysis and interpretation of ground water data collected as part of the Anaconda Company Bluewater Uranium Mill Site Investigation (CERCLIS ID NMD007106891) and San Mateo Creek Site Legacy Uranium Sites Investigation (CERCLIS ID NMN00060684), McKinley and Cibola County, New Mexico, Santa Fe.
State of New Mexico 2022, NM HB164 - Uranium Mine Cleanup, Santa Fe.
Thomson, B 2021, ‘The environmental legacy of uranium mining and milling in New Mexico’, in BA Frey, SA Kelley, F Goff, KE Zeigler, VT McLemore & DS Ulmer-Scholle (eds), New Mexico Geological Society 71 St Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, New Mexico Geological Society, Socorro, pp. 195–202,
United States Congress 1978, Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act.
US EPA 2009, Mines, Mills and Sub-Districts Map,
grants_alldistricts_mines_mills.jpg
US EPA 2010, Assessment of Health and Environmental Impacts of Uranium Mining and Milling: Five-Year Plan Grants Mining District, New Mexico,
US EPA 2011, The Legacy of Abandoned Uranium Mines in the Grants Mineral Belt, New Mexico.
US EPA 2016, Grants Mining District, New Mexico 2015 – 2020 Five-Year Plan to Assess and Address Health and Environmental Impacts of Uranium Mining and Milling.
White, JT 2023, ‘Making the most of nothing’, The Second PEST Conference: The Path from Data to Decisions, INTERA, Austin,
White, JT 2018, ‘A model-independent iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history-matching and uncertainty quantification in very high dimensions’, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 109, pp. 191–201.
White, JT, Hunt, RJ, Fienen, MN & Doherty, JE 2020, Approaches to Highly Parameterized Inversion: PEST++ Version 5, a Software Suite for Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Analysis, Management Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis: US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 7C26, US Geological Survey, Reston,
White, J, Knowling, M, Fienen, MN, Siade, A, Rea, O & Martinez, G 2022, ‘A model-independent tool for evolutionary constrained multi-objective optimization under uncertainty’, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 149,
j.envsoft.2022.105316
World Nuclear Association 2023, Nuclear Energy and Sustainable Development, World Nuclear Association, London, viewed 5 June 2024,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au