Authors: Sigda, J; Askar, A; Jones, T; Pickens, J; Paulka, S; Harvey, I; Stockdale, R

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_40

Cite As:
Sigda, J, Askar, A, Jones, T, Pickens, J, Paulka, S, Harvey, I & Stockdale, R 2024, 'Improving probabilistic predictions of post-closure groundwater solute loads for Ranger uranium mine', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 555-568, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_40

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Groundwater transport of mine-derived solutes to surface waters and the resulting concentrations after closure of the Ranger mine in the Northern Territory, Australia, are important to stakeholders and Energy Resources of Australia (ERA). In 2020 at ERA’s request and in consultation with stakeholders, INTERA Incorporated developed source terms for 20 constituents of potential concern (COPCs) and conducted a sitewide groundwater uncertainty analysis (GW UA) to estimate the predictive uncertainty in peak COPC loads from groundwater to surface waters. History matching to thousands of head observations constrained uncertainty in hydraulic parameters. Available data informed uncertain future COPC concentrations from each source. The GW UA’s many equally probable predictions of COPC loads became inputs to a surface water model that predicted COPC concentrations in receptor creeks, all supporting ERA’s Pit 3 backfill application. In 2023 INTERA updated source terms and ran a Pit 3-specific UA to support an updated pit backfilling application. This Pit 3 UA focused on pit COPC sources, especially expressed tailings porewater, called pit tailings flux (PTF), which was the primary driver for peak total magnesium loading in the 2021 GW UA. After ERA revised its reclamation plan to reduce the PTF volume, INTERA changed the UA workflow to allow uncertainty in PTF volume and location that had been fixed in 2021. Source concentration probability distribution functions were updated to incorporate new information. The Pit 3 UA applied a Bayesian approach to produce hundreds of equally likely predictions of COPC loads to nearby Magela Creek. Stakeholder input was received throughout implementation. The 2023 results showed a much smaller mean and variance in peak total magnesium loading to Magela Creek than the 2021 results. New information helped constrain the previous input uncertainty, leading to a decrease in predictive uncertainty in the peak load compared to 2021 even though the PTF volume and extent were treated as uncertain.

Keywords: groundwater flow and solute transport model, uncertainty, mine closure, tailings, waste rock, probabilistic prediction

References:
Bakker, M, Post, V, Langevin, CD, Hughes, JD, White, JT, Starn, JJ & Fienen, MN 2016, ‘Scripting MODFLOW model development using Python and FloPy’, Groundwater vol. 54, no. 5, 733–739.
Bedekar, V, Morway, ED, Langevin, CD & Tonkin, MJ 2016, MT3D-USGS Version 1: A U.S. Geological Survey Release of MT3DMS, .
Benjamin, JR & Cornell, CA 1970, Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
Commonwealth of Australia 1953, Atomic Energy Act.
Freeze, RA, Massmann, J, Smith, L, Sperling, T, & James, B 1990, ‘Hydrogeological decision analysis - 1. A framework’, Groundwater, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 738–766.
INTERA 2019, Final Report: Sitewide Conceptual Model Update and Calibrated/Post-Closure Groundwater Flow Models for Ranger Mine, prepared for Energy Resources of Australia, 14 March 2019 and updated 19 October 2019.
INTERA 2021, Final Report: Groundwater Uncertainty Analysis for Ranger Mine Closure, prepared for Energy Resources of Australia, 10 May 2021.
INTERA 2023, Final Report: Groundwater Uncertainty Analysis for Ranger Pit 3 Sources, prepared for Energy Resources of Australia, 31 August 2023.
Langevin, CD, Hughes, JD, Banta, ER, Niswonger, RG, Panday, S & Provost, AM 2017, Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Flow Model (No. 6-A55), US Geological Survey.
Langevin, CD, Provost, AM, Panday, S & Hughes, JD 2022, Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Transport Model (No. 6-A61), US Geological Survey.
Niswonger, RG, Panday, S & Ibaraki, M 2011, ‘MODFLOW-NWT, a Newton formulation for MODFLOW-2005’, Techniques and Methods 6-A37, United States Geological Survey.
Paulka, SM, Staggs, D, Ralls, G, Sivarudrappa, K & Sigda, J 2023, ‘Transforming Ranger’s TSF to a process water storage facility’, in B Abbasi, J Parshley, A Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2023: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth,
Ramsar Convention 1971, Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat, www.ramsar.org
Tonkin, M & Doherty, J 2009, ‘Calibration-constrained Monte Carlo analysis of highly parameterized models using subspace techniques’, Water Resources Research, vol. 45, no. 12, W00B10,
Watermark Numerical Computing 2015, Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Complex Environmental Models: PEST: Complete Theory and What it Means for Modelling the Real World, Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane.
Water Solutions 2020, Ranger Surface Water Model – Configuration, Calibration and Simulation, prepared for Energy Resources of Australia.
Water Solutions 2021, Ranger Surface Water Model – Model Upgrade, prepared for Energy Resources of Australia.
Welter, DE, White, JT, Hunt, RJ & Doherty, JE 2015, ‘Approaches in highly parameterized inversion— PEST++ Version 3, a Parameter ESTimation and uncertainty analysis software suite optimized for large environmental models’, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 7, chapter C12,
White, JT, Fienen, MN & Doherty, JE 2016a, pyEMU: A Python Framework for Environmental Model Uncertainty Analysis, version 1, computer software, https://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F75D8Q01
White, JT, Hemmings, B, Fienen, MN & Knowling, MJ 2021b, ‘Towards improved environmental modeling outcomes: enabling lowcost access to high-dimensional, geostatistical-based decision-support analyses’, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 139, no. 105022, .
White, JT, Hunt, RJ, Doherty, JE & Fienen, MN 2021, Pest++ Version 5 User's Guide,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au