Authors: Walls, J

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_58

Cite As:
Walls, J 2024, 'Don't let the tail(ings) wag the mine: guiding tailings storage facility closure designs for compliance', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 815-828, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_58

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Navigating the choppy waters of tailings storage facility (TSF) closure is no simple feat — it’s a bit like teaching an old dog new tricks, but with more environmental regulations. TSFs can be some of the most complex mine closure components, as they pose significant environmental, social and economic risks if not properly designed, constructed and rehabilitated. The Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM) provides a framework for the safe management of TSFs throughout their lifecycle, from planning to closure and post-closure. This paper presents some of the lessons learnt and challenges encountered while undertaking engineering closure designs of TSFs for GISTM compliance, with a focus on aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). The paper discusses the closure hierarchy that is typically considered for TSFs, which serves as a foundational framework for identifying appropriate post-closure land uses and for developing robust engineering designs. It suggests that it is possible to design and implement closure strategies for TSFs that not only meet GISTM standards but also contribute to achieving several UN SDGs. Additionally, the paper examines strategies to reduce both initial investment and ongoing costs associated with monitoring and maintenance post-closure. Some of the challenges that are highlighted in the paper include the knowledge base, uncertainties regarding the long-term performance and behaviour of TSFs, and the design life of the closure components. By sharing insights and experiences from TSF closure design projects, which sometimes feels like trying to tame a beast before it hibernates, this paper aims to provide some recommendations and best practices for future projects.

Keywords: closure designs, GISTM, UNSDG, tailings, TSF

References:
Aubertin, M, Bussière, B & Bernier, L 2002, Environnement Et Gestion Des Rejets Miniers (Environment and Management of Mining Waste), Presses Internationales Polytechnique, viewed 9 June 2024,
Bjelkevik, AG 2011, ‘ICOLD – sustainable design and post-closure performance of tailings dams’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2011: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 353–359, .
DMR 2005, Guideline Document for the Evaluation of the Quantum of Closure-Related Financial Provision Provided by a Mine.
Gan, J, Li, Y, Su, B, Wang, L & Zhang, T 2012, ‘Effects of salinity and water availability on vegetation establishment in tailings dams’, Ecological Engineering, vol. 44, pp. 264–270.
Global Tailings Review 2020, Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management.
Google 2024, Google Earth Pro, computer software.
Howard, P 2022, Nature-Based Solutions Have to be Integral in the Mining Sector, LinkedIn post, viewed 10 June 2024,
ICMM 2019, Integrated Mine Closure Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn.
ICMM 2020, The Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management.
ICMM 2021a, Global Conformance Protocols: Global Standards on Tailings Management.
ICMM 2021b, Tailings Management: Good Practice Guide.
ICOLD 2016, Tailings Dams: Risk of Dangerous Occurrences: Lessons Learnt from Practical Experiences (ICOLD Bulletin 157).
Kadlec, RH & Wallace, SD 2009, Treatment Wetlands, CRC Press.
Morgan, RP 2005, Soil Erosion and Conservation, Blackwell Publishing.
Roche, C, Thygesen, K & Baker, E (eds) 2017, Mine Tailings Storage: Safety Is no Accident, UN Environment, GRID-Arendal, viewed 9 June 2024, 
MineTailings_lores.pdf?1510660693
Sanchez, F, Romo, MP, Silva, R & Palacios, A 2015, ‘Analysis and design of tailings dams for long-term safety’, Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 3891–3903.
Sheoran, AS & Sheoran, V 2006, ‘Heavy metal removal mechanism of acid mine drainage in wetlands: a critical review’, Minerals Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 105–116,
Slingerland, N, Beier, NA & Wilson, GW 2019, ‘Stress testing geomorphic and traditional tailings dam designs for closure using a landscape evolution model’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1533–1544,
1915_120_Slingerland
Valentin, C, Poesen, J & Li, Y 2005, ‘Gully erosion: Impacts, factors and control’, CATENA, vol. 63, no. 2–3, pp. 132–153.
Van der Colf, RP, Bolton, CR, Ilott, IR & Walls, JM 2024, ‘Integrating rain-on-grid modelling to enhance the development of tailings storage facility surface water closure plans’, Symposium “Dams for People, Water and Environment and Development” - 92nd ICOLD Annual Meeting, ICOLD, New Delhi (in review).
Veiga, MM, Scoble, M & McAllister, ML 2001, ‘Mining with communities’, Natural Resources Forum, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 191–202.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au