Authors: Sanders, J; Slingerland, N; Murphy, D

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_82

Cite As:
Sanders, J, Slingerland, N & Murphy, D 2024, 'Closing the gap: closure cost estimation trends and pathways to improved maturity', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1149-1162, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_82

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
In an ideal scenario, the upper and lower confidence limits of a closure cost estimate should align with the base estimate as mine closure planning progresses; however, this is rarely the case. As mines approach closure, cost estimates typically rise. Despite various approaches proposed to improve cost estimate accuracy over the years, cost overruns remain common. The authors suggest that the issue lies not only in the estimation approaches but also in the misalignment between the maturity of closure planning and the level of cost estimate accuracy required. Current estimating tools and approaches are not flawed; instead, robust closure planning and design are often inadequately applied. The paper suggests actions to improve closure design maturity at each stage of the mine life, ensuring cost estimate inputs mature appropriately as the closure date approaches. Examples and case studies highlight the common disconnect between closure maturity and cost estimate accuracy. A review of closure cost estimation tools and approaches over the past 20 years shows that cost overruns are widespread, indicating that estimation approaches might not be the sole issue. With growing scrutiny on closure-related environmental, social and governance commitments, the mining industry needs to produce more confident, accurate and transparent closure cost estimates. This paper underlines existing and practical methods for improving estimation inputs.

Keywords: closure cost estimation, closure planning, closure maturity, case study

References:
AACE 2022, PGD 01 - Guide to Cost Estimate Classification Professional Guidance Document No. 01 - Guide to Cost Estimate Classification Systems.
AACE 2024, Recommended Practice: 10S-90 Cost Engineering Terminology 10S-90: Cost Engineering Terminology.
ACG 2024, Online Repository of Conference Proceedings: Mine Closure, viewed 18 June 2024,
f/mineclosure
Dunow, T & Kalisch, B 2022, ‘The high cost of poor closure estimates’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1193–1200,
ERA 2004, ERA 2004 Annual Report,
ERA 2018, ASX Announcement: Ranger Project Area - Closure Feasibility Study Update, viewed 15 June 2024,
ERA 2022, Chapter 11: Financial Provision for Closure,
Financial_provision_for_closure_2022.pdf
ERA 2023, Mine Closure Plan for Ranger Mine.
Fletcher, D, Hutton, A & Dick, C 2011, ‘The “smoking gun” of detailed mine closure cost over-run – a review using case studies of the real costs associated with the demolition and removal of infrastructure in mine closure’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & A Beersing (eds), Mine Closure 2011: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 97–106,
Flyvbjerg, B & Gardner, D 2023, How Big Things Get Done: The Surprising Factors Behind Every Successful Project, from Home Renovations to Space Exploration.
Goldcorp 2018, Equity Mine - 25 Years of Closure,
Government of Canada 2022, What’s Happening at Giant Mine? September to December 2022, viewed 14 June 2024,
ICMM 2019, Financial Concepts for Mine Closure.
ICMM 2022, Closure Maturity Framework, Tool for Closure User Guide, viewed 2 June 2024,
publications/pdfs/environmental-stewardship/2020/guidance_closure-maturity-framework_update.pdf
Kahneman, D 2011, Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Laurence, DC 2006, ‘Why Do Mines Close?’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2006: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 88–94,
Minogue, S 2020, Public Hearings into $1B Giant Mine Remediation Begin at Last, CBC, viewed 14 June 2024,
Queensland Government 2017, Project Cost Estimating Manual, 7th edn, Department of Transport and Main Roads.
Reilly, J, Moergeli, A & Sanders, P 2015, ‘Risk-based, probabilistic cost estimating method’, ITA 2015: World Tunnel Conference.
United States of America 2002, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Woolley, M & Hutton, A 2006, ‘Calculating a realistic security bond and assessing true mine closure liabilities’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2006: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 525–535,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au