Authors: Cooper, C

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_88

Cite As:
Cooper, C 2024, 'Regional-scale post-mining land-use transition: opportunities and challenges for industry and regulators', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1223-1236, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_88

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
How to manage successful ‘mine closure’ and achieve tenement relinquishment is a pressing question for miners, governments and communities, in many jurisdictions, particularly in regions exposed to a single commodity that may be near to exhausting reserves, or, across Australia’s coal fields; facing an industry approaching end of life. This paper explores key drivers and challenges for miners and governments, and the policy gaps that must be addressed to provide pathways for miners to confidently plan and execute closure, achieve tenement relinquishment, divest their landholdings in predictable, acceptable timeframes and facilitate regional economic transition planning. Key regulatory challenges such as the misalignment of operational approvals with closure activities and achievable outcomes, lack of policy regarding management of residual risk, and an absence of aggregated regional data to inform post mining land use planning, are all frustrating decision-making for Government, miners and developers. In Australian mining jurisdictions there is growing recognition that a new approach is required to create clear and reliable pathways to land use transition. While there are no strict regulatory barriers to miners collaborating with developers to modify closure planning toward alternative land uses, there are significant disincentives for both miners and developers including uncertainty regarding relinquishment timeframes and reluctance from the mining industry to relax control over all lease land until rehabilitation obligations are fulfilled. There is a ‘resigned acceptance’ by stakeholders that miners will remain the land stewards for up to 20 years following closure execution, frustrating the ability of strategic planners and developers to explore economic opportunities. Drawing on personal project experience including project managing the successful relinquishment, and transition of a Hunter Valley (NSW) coal mine to a major international tourist facility, this paper presents lessons learnt from contemporary relinquishment projects and policy initiatives from several jurisdictions that can contribute to improved pathways for industry and regulators to facilitate a collaborative approach to tenement relinquishment and regional transition planning.

Keywords: post mining land use, relinquishment, transition planning, residual risk management, strategic planning

References:
Business Queensland 2020, Residual Risk Payments for an Environmental Authority, viewed 19 May 2024,
Ernst & Young 2022, Diversification and Growth Transforming Mining Land in the Hunter Valley, Hunter Renewal, Muswellbrook, viewed 20 May 2024,
Franks, D, Brereton, D & Moran, C 2010, ‘Coal mining: managing the cumulative impacts of multiple mines on regional communities and environments in Australia’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 28, no. 4,
146155110X12838715793129
Greg & Sylvia Ray 2019, Memories of Rhondda Colliery,
Lake Macquarie City Library 2024, Rhondda, viewed 20 May 2024,
=1085&vid=20&tmpt=narrative&narid=4884
Mine Land Rehabilitation Authority (MRLA) 2024, What is the Mine Land Rehabilitation Authority?, viewed 20 May 2024,
NSW Department of Planning and Environment 2022, Hunter Regional Plan 2041, Sydney.
New South Wales Government 1979, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, viewed 3 June 2024,
New South Wales Government 1992, Mining Act 1992 (Historical Version for 15 November 2010 to 6 December 2010), viewed 6 June 2024,
NSW Minerals Council 2024, Our Economic Contribution, viewed 3 June 2024,
NSW Resources Regulator 2024, Rhondda Colliery Rehabilitation, viewed 3 June 2024,
news/rhondda-colliery-rehabilitation#:~:text=Northern%20Rhondda%20Collier
y%20is%20a,operated%20by%20Yancoal%20since%202017
Olsen Environmental Consulting Pty Limited 2008, Relinquishment Assurance Report Northern (Rhondda) Mine, Olsen Environmental Consulting Pty Limited, Figtree
Parliament of New South Wales 2024, Beneficial and Productive Post-Mining Land Use, viewed 2 June 2024,
%20post-mining%20land%20use%20-%20Updated%2030%20May%202024.pdf
Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research 2006, Virginia Coal, viewed 8 June 2024,
~:text=Over%20the%20past%2010%20years,productivity%22)%20has%20increased%20steadily
Yancoal 2022, Northern (Rhondda) Colliery Mining Operations Plan December 2022 – July 2023, Yancoal Australia Pty Limited, Sydney.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au