Authors: Erasmus, J; Potgieter, J

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_92

Cite As:
Erasmus, J & Potgieter, J 2024, 'Legislative frameworks and sustainable mining practices in South Africa: integrating environmental and socio-economic objectives', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1271-1280, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2415_92

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
As climate change intensifies, the mining sector faces the dual challenge of maintaining economic viability while upholding environmental responsibilities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the South African Mining Act and related regulatory frameworks, focusing on the implementation of end land use plans (ELUPs) and closure criteria as critical tools for achieving sustainable post-mining landscapes. The study delves into key legislative instruments, including the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA) (Republic of South Africa 1998) and the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 (MPRDA) (Republic of South Africa 2002), and examines their integration with sustainable development goals (SDGs) to foster ecological resilience and socio-economic development. Central to the discussion is the role of ELUPs and closure criteria in guiding the rehabilitation of mining sites. ELUPs serve as strategic frameworks that set long-term goals for land use after mining operations have ceased, while closure criteria provide specific, measurable standards to achieve these goals. The paper emphasises the importance of aligning mining activities with climate-conscious strategies, ensuring that postmining landscapes not only restore ecosystems but also contribute to the economic and social wellbeing of local communities. The review highlights how the South African regulatory context, when effectively implemented, supports the transition from extraction to rehabilitation, addressing both environmental and socio-economic dimensions. By integrating adaptive management practices and robust environmental monitoring, ELUPs can play a pivotal role in mitigating the impacts of climate change and promoting sustainable development. This paper contributes to the discourse on sustainable mining by offering a detailed analysis of the regulatory landscape and proposing practical approaches for enhancing compliance and community engagement in mining closure practices.

Keywords: closure criteria, end land use, climate change, sustainability, rehabilitation, mining, end land use plan, socio-economic

References:
Crowley, TJ 2000, ‘Causes of climate change over the past 1000 years’, Science, vol. 289, pp. 270–277,
DeGarady, CJ & Halbrook, RS 2006, ‘Using Anurans as bioindicators of PCB contaminated streams’, Journal of Herpetology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 95–102.
Engler, R, Randin, CF, Thuiller, W, Dullinger, S, Zimmermann, NE, Araujo, MB & Pearman, PB 2010, ‘21st century climate change threatens mountain flora unequally across Europe’, Global Change Biology, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 2330–2341,
Herrick, JE, Abrahamse, T 2019, Land Restoration for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: An International Resource Panel Think Piece, United Nations Environment Programme.
Kidd, M 2011, Environmental Law, 2nd edn, Juta and Company, Cape Town.
Mpanza, M, Adam, E & Moolla, R 2021, ‘A critical review of the impact of South Africa’s mine closure policy and the winding-up process of mining companies’, The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, vol. 17, no. 1.
Parra, C, Lewis, B & Ali, SH 2021, Mining, Materials, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): 2030 and Beyond, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Purvis, B, Mao, Yong & Robinson, D 2019, ‘Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins’, Sustainability Science, vol. 14, pp. 681–695,
Republic of South Africa 1996, Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996.
Republic of South Africa 1998, National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998.
Republic of South Africa 2002, Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002.
Rio Tinto 2023, ‘Rio Tinto and Government of Madagascar reach agreement supporting the long-term operation of QMM’,
Skerratt, LF, Burger, L, Speare, R, Cashins, S, McDonald, KR, Phillot, AD, ... Kenyon, N 2007, ‘Spread of Chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction in frogs’, EcoHealth, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 125–134.
United Nations 2024, The 17 Goals, viewed 12 June 2024,
Vinti, C 2017, ‘An analysis of the interplay between the twin provisions of section 48 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act and section 48 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, in respect of “protected areas”’, Obiter, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 394–406.
Vinti, C 2018, ‘The power to declare a prohibition or restriction on prospecting or mining to protect the environment: a critical assessment of section 49 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 and section 24(2A) of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998’, Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law.
World Commission on Environment and Development 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au