Authors: Chambati, Y; Green, M; Watson, B; Andrews, PG

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_22

Cite As:
Chambati, Y, Green, M, Watson, B & Andrews, PG 2024, 'Seismic monitoring of crush pillar behaviour in a deep-level gold mine using active sources', in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 417-428, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_22

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Gold Fields, South Deep Gold Mine uses crush pillars in their deep-level operation to support de-stress stopes. There was a concern about the ability of these pillars to withstand dynamic closure due to seismic events that are common at that depth. A study was conducted at approximately 3,000 m below the surface to determine the dynamic behaviour of these pillars. This paper describes active seismic source monitoring that was used to determine changes that developed within the pillar during a seismic event. The results showed that the crush pillar responded dynamically to large events, even when fully formed. These seismic events induced large decreases in seismic velocity measured using active sources. These drops were followed by a characteristic post-seismic relaxation, indicative of material damage followed by gradual healing. No evidence of permanent ‘damage’ was observed; however, no very large (moment magnitude greater than 2) seismic events occurred during the monitoring period.

Keywords: crush pillar, seismic, deep mine, de-stress, rockbursts

References:
Bartels, RH, Beatty, JBC & Barsky, BA 1987, ‘An introduction to splines for use in computer graphics and geometric modeling’, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.
Brenguier, F, Campillo, M, Hadziioannou, C & Shapiro, N 2008, ‘Postseismic relaxation along the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield from continuous seismological observations’, Science, vol. 321, No. 5895, pp. 1478–1481.
Chelminski, S, Watson, LM, & Ronen, S 2019, ‘Low frequency pneumatic seismic sources’, Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 67, no. 6,
pp. 1547–1556, .
Green, M 2023, ‘Active seismic source pillar monitoring’, Institute of Mine Seismology 2023 Seminar, pp. 15–18.
Lynch, RA 2010, ‘Passive and active seismic monitoring in mines’, keynote address at Deep and High Stress Mining Seminar 2010, Santiago, Chile.
Lynch, RA 2012, ‘Active seismic monitoring’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Deep Mining 2012: Proceedings of the Sixth International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 201–210,
1201_14_lynch
Mikesell, TD, Malcolm, AE, Yang, D & Haney, MM 2015, ‘A comparison of methods to estimate seismic phase delays: numerical examples for coda wave interferometry’, Geophysics Journal International, vol. 202, No. 1, pp. 347–360.
Niu, F, Silver, PG, Daley, TM, Cheng, X & Majer, EL 2008, ‘Preseismic velocity changes observed from active source monitoring at the Parkfields SAFOD drill site’, Nature, vol. 454, pp. 204–208.
Silver, P, Daley, TM, Niu, F & Majer, EL 2007, ‘Active source monitoring of crosswell seismic travel time for stress-induced changes’, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 97, no. 1B, pp. 281–293.
Watson, BP, Kuijpers, JS, & Stacey, TR 2010, ‘Design of Merensky Reef crush pillars’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 110, no. 10. pp. 581–591.
Watson, BP, Pretorius, W, Mpunzi, P, du Plooy, M, Matthysen, K & Kuijpers, JS 2014, ‘Design and positive financial impact of crush pillars on mechanised deep-level mining at South Deep Gold Mine’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 114, no. 10. pp. 863–880.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au