Ductile shotcrete linings: A potential solution for mining in overstressed weak rocks?

Authors: Wannenmacher, H; Entfellner, M; Kalenchuk, K; Oke, J; Fiest, T; Perras, MA

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_33

Cite As:
Wannenmacher, H, Entfellner, M, Kalenchuk, K, Oke, J, Fiest, T & Perras, MA 2024, 'Ductile shotcrete linings: A potential solution for mining in overstressed weak rocks?', in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, pp. 563-574, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_33

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Mining and tunnelling in overstressed weak rocks can result in substantial and long-lasting deformations, often referred to as ‘squeezing ground conditions’. The magnitude of deformations is closely tied to the rock mass competency and stress conditions, as well as the applied excavation and support concept and can reach tens or even hundreds of centimetres in very weak rock conditions. The direct relation between rock pressure and deformation, represented by the ground reaction curve, suggests applying the yielding principle. The yielding principle states that the support capacity requirement decreases as deformation increases. To enable controlled deformation and safe working conditions, yielding elements as a part of the shotcrete lining are implemented. These elements avoid overstressing the shotcrete lining even at large and long-lasting creep displacements. During the deformation process, the support pressure of the yielding elements and liner increases, thus stabilising the rock mass. This economic support technique represents the state-of-the-art infrastructure tunnelling practice in overstressed weak rocks. A novel yielding element of high-strength expanded polystyrene has been invented, which overcomes existing systems’ drawbacks. Recent experiences from applications in Alpine base tunnels are presented. This deformation-based support system may be an economical solution in mining for permanent structures with large deformations and required long-term stability.

Keywords: deep mining, tunnelling, ground support, ductile lining, shotcrete, squeezing ground, overstressed weak rock, yielding elements, NATM, HS-EPS

References:
Anagnostou, G & Cantieni, L 2007, ‘Design and analysis of yielding support in squeezing ground’, 11th ISRM Congress, International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Lisbon.
Barla, G 2009, ‘Innovative tunneling construction method to cope with squeezing at the Saint Martin La Porte access adit (Lyon–Turin base tunnel)’, ISRM Regional Symposium - EUROCK 2009, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
Barla, G, Bonini, M & Semeraro, M 2011, ‘Analysis of the behaviour of a yield-control support system in squeezing rock’, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 146–154.
Bharadwaj, B, Bishop, CS, Renaud, AD & Rowson, L 2024, Cigar Lake Operation – Northern Saskatchewan, Canada, Cameco technical report, national instrument 43-101.
Cantieni, L & Anagnostou, G 2008, ‘The effect of the stress path on squeezing behavior in tunneling’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 42, pp. 289–318.
Chen, W, Hao, H, Hughes, D, Shi, Y, Cui, J & Li Z-X 2015, ‘Static and dynamic mechanical properties of expanded polystyrene’, Materials and Design, vol. 69, pp. 170–180.
Dalgic, S 2002, ‘Tunneling in squeezing rock, the Bolu tunnel, Anatolian Motorway, Turkey’, Engineering Geology, vol. 67, pp. 73–96.
Daller, J, Atzl, G, & Weigl, J 2011, ‘The new Semmering base tunnel - tunnel design in the fault zone’, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 237–254.
Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp 2022, Abaqus/CAE, computer software.
Entfellner, M, Hamdi, P, Wang, X, Wannenmacher H & Amann, F 2023, ‘Investigating High-Strength Expanded Polystyrene (HS-EPS) as Yielding Support Elements for Tunnelling in Squeezing Ground Conditions’, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 140, no. 105261.
Entfellner, M 2024, ‘Design and construction of tunnels in overstressed weak rocks with novel yielding elements’, doctoral thesis, Graz University of Technology, Graz.
European Standards Organizations 2020, Fire Classification of Construction Products and Building Elements - Part 1: Classification Using Data from Reaction to Fire Tests (EN 13501-1), European Standards Organisations.
Fasching, F & Vanek, R 2011, ‘Engineering geological characterisation of fault rocks and fault zones’, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, vol. 4 no. 3, pp. 181–194.
Fenner, R 1938, ‚Untersuchungen zur erkenntnis des gebirgsdrucks‘, Glückauf, vol. 74, no. 32, pp. 681–695.
Golser, J 2012, ‘Worldwide development of NATM’, 50 years of NATM – Experience Reports, International Tunnelling Association, Austria, pp. 23–27.
Hadjigeorgiou, J & Potvin, Y 2023, ‘Ground support guidelines for squeezing ground conditions’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 371–380.
Harer, G, Prein, R, Schwab, P & Wehr, H 1996, ‘Tunnelling in poor ground conditions – case history Galgenbergtunnel’, Felsbau, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 82–86.
Hill, R 1979, ‘Aspects of invariance in solid mechanics’, Advances in Applied Mechanics, vol. 18, pp. 1–75.
Implenia Austria GmbH 2020, Technical Report: Uniaxial Compressive Strength Testing of HS-EPS Yielding Elements, unpublished report, RWTH Aachen University.
Kovári, K 2009, ‘Design methods with yielding support in squeezing and swelling rocks’, World Tunnel Congress 2009.
Lenk, K 1930, Der Ausgleich des Gebirgsdruckes in großen Teufen beim Berg- und Tunnelbau, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Morgenroth, J, Perras, MA & Khan, UT 2020, ‘Convolutional neural networks for predicting tunnel support and liner performance: Cigar Lake Mine case study’, ARMA: Proceedings of the 54th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, ARMA 20-1513, American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria.
Mercier-Langevin, F & Wilson, D 2013, ‘Lapa Mine – ground control practices in extreme squeezing ground’, in Y Potvin & B Brady (eds), Ground Support 2013: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 119–131,
1304_06_Mercier-Langevin
Merlini, D, Stocker, D, Falanesca, M & Schuerch, R 2018, ‘The Ceneri base tunnel: construction experience with the southern portion of the flat railway line crossing the Swiss Alps’, Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 235–248.
Moritz, B 1999, Ductile Support System for Tunnels in Squeezing Rock, doctoral thesis, Graz University of Technology, Austria.
Moritz, B 2011, ‘Yielding elements - requirements, overview and comparison’, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, vol. 4, no. 3,
pp. 221–236.
OeGG 2010, Guideline for the Geotechnical Design of Underground Structures with Conventional Excavation, Austrian Society for Geomechanics, Salzburg.
OeGG 2014, Geotechnical Monitoring in Conventional Tunnelling, Austrian Society for Geomechanics, Salzburg.
Oke, J, Vlachopoulos, N & Diederichs, M 2018, ‘Improvement to the convergence-confinement method: inclusion of support installation proximity and stiffness’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 51, pp. 1495–1519.
Pacher, F 1964, Deformationsmessungen im Versuchsstollen als Mittel zur Erforschung des Gebirgsverhaltens und zur Bemessung des Ausbaues, pp. 149–161.
Pöchhacker, H 1974, ‘Moderner tunnelvortrieb in sehr stark druckhaftem gebirge‘, Sonderdruck Porr-Nachrichtenheft, vol. 57/58.
Pöttler, R, Starjakob, F & Spöndlin, D 2005, ‘Tunnelling through highly squeezing ground - a case history’, Gornictwo i Geoinzynieria, vol. 29, no. 3/1, pp. 311–318.
Rabcewicz, L 1950, Die Hilfsgewölbebauweise, doctoral thesis, Graz University of Technology, Graz.
Rabcewicz, L & Pacher, F 1975, ‘Die elemente der neuen österreichischen tunnelbauweise und ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung‘, ÖIZ, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 315–323.
Radončić, N 2011, Tunnel Design and Prediction of System Behaviour in Weak Ground, doctoral thesis, Graz University of Technology, Graz.
Röthlisberger, B, Spörri, D & Rehbock, M 2016, ‘Unexpected difficult ground conditions in the multi-function Station Faido’, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 129–138.
Schubert, W 1996, ‘Dealing with squeezing conditions in Alpine tunnels’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 145–153.
Schubert, W, Golser, J & Schwab, P 1996, ‘Weiterentwicklung des Ausbaus für stark druckhaftes Gebirge’, Felsbau, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 36–40.
Schubert, W 2008, ‘Design of ductile tunnel linings’, ARMA: Proceedings of the 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMA 08-146, American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria.
Schubert, W & Brunnegger, S 2017, ‘New ductile tunnel lining system’, Proceedings of the ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2017.
Storåkers, B 1986, ‘On material representation and constitutive branching in finite compressible elasticity’, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 125–145.
Thut, A, Naterop, D, Steiner, P & Stolz, M 2006, ‘Tunnelling in squeezing rock - yielding elements and face control’, Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Tunnel Construction and Underground Structures.
Wagner, H, Handke, D, Matter, J, Fabbri, D & Keiper, K 2009, ‘Concepts to overcome squeezing geological conditions at the Koralm tunnel’, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 601–611.
Warren, SN, Pakalnis, R, Raffaldi, MJ, Benton, DJ, Sandbak, L & Barnard, CK 2019, ‘Ground support design for weak rock mass: quantifying time-dependent closure in squeezing ground’, in J Hadjigeorgiou & M Hudyma (eds), Ground Support 2019: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 169–184,
Weidinger, F 2012, ‘Tauerntunnel 1. und 2. röhre - markante entwicklungsschritte der NATM’, Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte, vol. 157, no. 12, pp. 444–447.
Wittke, W, Wittke-Schmitt, B & Schmitt, D 2005, ‘The 9 km long Kallidromo tunnel of the new highspeed railway line Athens–Thessaloniki, Greece, tunnel sections in squeezing ground’, in S Erdem & T Solak (eds.), Underground Space Use: Analysis of the Past and Lessons for the Future, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 321–326.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au