Advanced analysis of seismic data to validate critical assumptions

Authors: de Beer, W; William, R; Prahastudhi, S; Braim, M

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_62

Cite As:
de Beer, W, William, R, Prahastudhi, S & Braim, M 2024, 'Advanced analysis of seismic data to validate critical assumptions', in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, pp. 981-994, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_62

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Passive mine seismic data are mainly used for hazard assessment in various forms. Although geophysical methods generally do not provide absolute numbers, locations of density or velocity contrasts, seismic source mechanisms and stress directions can be determined. Stress inversions, using seismic moment tensors, and passive seismic tomography can be used to reach conclusions about the state and fabric of the rock mass at a given time. Stress inversions are useful in describing the stress field distribution of the rock mass at a given time and place. Tomographic methods are useful for tracking the influence of mining on the surrounding rock. Tomographic methods also provide information in areas where there is no seismic activity but which are traversed by seismic radiation. These techniques are applied to a block cave to test and expand geotechnical models and illustrate the evolution of stress distribution in the rock.

Keywords: seismicity, tomography, stress inversion, time lapse, model validation

References:
Brady, BHG & Brown, ET 2004, Rock Mechanics for Underground Mining, Springer, Berlin, pp. 197–223.
Brown, ET 2007, Block Caving Geomechanics 2nd Ed. – the International Caving Study 1997–2004, Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia.
Crowley, JW, Baig, AM, Urbancic, T & Von Lunen, E 2015, ‘4D tomography and deformation from microseismic data’, Proceedings of the 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
GA 2018, Confidential consultant’s report.
Gibowicz, SJ & Kijko, A 1994, An Introduction to Mining Seismology, Academic Press, Cambridge.
Heidbach, O, Rajabi, M, Reiter, K, Ziegler, M & WSM Team 2016, World Stress Map Database Release 2016. V. 1.1, GFZ Data Services.
Hudson, J, Pearce, R & Rogers, R 1989, ‘Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 94, pp. 765–774.
Jones, R & Stewart, R 1997, ‘A method for determining significant structures in a cloud of earthquakes’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 102, pp. 8245–8254.
Jost, ML & Herrmann, RB 1989, ‘A student’s guide to and review of moment tensors’, Seismological Research Letters, vol. 60,
pp. 37–57.
Michael, AJ 1984, ‘Determination of stress from slip data: faults and folds’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 89, pp. 11517–11526.
Niu, F, Silver, PG, Daley, TM, Cheng, X & Majer, EL 2008, ‘Preseismic velocity changes observed from active source monitoring at the Parkfield SAFOD drill site’, Nature, vol. 454, pp. 204–208.
Silver, PG, Daley, TM, Niu, F & Majer, EL 2007, ‘Active source monitoring of cross-well seismic travel time for stress-induced changes’, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 97, pp. 281–293,
Tarantola, A & Valette, B 1982, ‘Generalised nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion’, Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 219–232.
Vavryčuk, V 2014, ‘Iterative joint inversion for stress and fault orientations from focal mechanisms’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 199, pp. 69–77.
Yamamura, K 2003, ‘Long-term observation of in situ seismic velocity and attenuation’, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 108,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au