Authors: Andersson, J; Sjöberg, J; Svartsjaern, M; Töyrä, J; Wimmer, M; Swan, G

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_78

Cite As:
Andersson, J, Sjöberg, J, Svartsjaern, M, Töyrä, J, Wimmer, M & Swan, G 2024, 'Effects of yielding pillars and chevron sequences on convergence and released energy in sublevel cave mining', in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, pp. 1193-1206, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2465_78

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Yielding pillars have been effectively employed in many underground hard rock mines as a means of support, with pillars designed to yield in a ductile manner to mitigate rockbursts. The concept has so far mainly been applied to cut-and-fill and blasthole stoping with consolidated backfill mining methods. For sublevel cave mining in the LKAB Kiirunavaara Mine, the hanging wall–footwall convergence, over the length of the orebody, is one potential factor that can contribute to release of energy associated with seismic events. By implementing a configuration with large-scale yielding ore pillars, it is theorised that the rate of convergence per mined volume can be reduced, thus also reducing the seismic potential in the mine. To assess the feasibility of this approach, a 3D numerical model was utilised to analyse convergence and energy release effects. The study aimed to demonstrate conceptually, but with a representative orebody geometry, that the proposed mining concept with yielding pillars and a chevron sequence can result in reduced convergence and/or released energy. Four mining scenarios were evaluated, including standard sublevel caving and an alternative chevron-shaped mining front, with and without yielding pillars included. The results suggest that employing yielding pillars could effectively mitigate seismic potential by reducing convergence rates and energy release. However, the specifics of pillar design, including size and recovery, require further investigation. This research and development work contributes to ongoing efforts to improve safety and efficiency in underground mining operations in the LKAB Kiirunavaara Mine.

Keywords: sublevel caving, numerical modelling, mine seismicity, pillars

References:
Dahnér, C, Malmgren, L & Bošković, 2012, ‘Transition from non-seismic mine to a seismically active mine: Kiirunavaara Mine‘, Eurock 2012: Proceedings Rock Engineering and Technology for Sustainable Underground Construction, International Society for Rock Mechanics, Lisbon.
du Plessis, M 2018, ‘Manuel Rocha Medal recipient: the design and behaviour of crush pillars on the Merensky Reef‘, in Z Zhao, Y Zhou & J Shang (eds), Proceedings of the 10th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium (ARMS10), Singapore – The 2018 ISRM International Symposium.
Ghazvinian, E, Garza-Cruz, T, Bouzeran, L, Fuenzalida, M, Cheng, Z, Cancino, C & Pierce, M 2020. ‘Theory and implementation of the Itasca Constitutive Model for Advanced Strain Softening (IMASS)’, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference and Exhibition on Mass Mining (MassMin 2020), University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 451–461.
Hedley, DGF 1992, Rockburst Handbook for Ontario Hardrock Mines, CANMET Special Report SP92-1E.
ITASCA 2022, FLAC3D (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua 3D), version 7, computer software, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis.
Mortazavi, A & Brummer, RK 2000, The Behaviour of Sill Pillars and Highly-Stressed Remnants, report to CAMIRO Mining Division, Itasca Consulting Canada Inc., Sudbury.
Ortlepp, D 1983, ‘Chapter 12: the mechanism and control of rockbursts’, in S Budavari (ed.), Rock Mechanics in Mining Practice, The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg.
Sandström, D 2003, Analysis of the Virgin Stress State at the Kiirunavaara Mine, licentiate thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå.
Svartsjaern, M, Rentzelos, T, Shekhar, G, Swedberg, E, Boskovic, M & Hebert, Y 2022, ‘Controlled reopening of the Kiirunavaara production block 22 after a 4.2 magnitude event‘, in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 685–698,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au