DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_103
Cite As:
Perlatti, F, Evangelista Kutchenski Junior, F, Stutz Salgueiro, R, de Azevedo Coimbra, R & Carneiro de Jesus Neto, J 2025, 'Technosols as a sustainable solution for mine closure and rehabilitation', in S Knutsson, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds),
Mine Closure 2025: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-12,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_103
Abstract:
One of the major challenges faced by mining companies worldwide is the management of tailings and waste materials generated by mining activities, as well as the lack of sufficiently healthy soils for effective mine closure and rehabilitation. In many cases, mining sites operate in remote areas where post-mining rehabilitation is hindered by the availability of suitable cover materials to support plant growth in environmental recovery processes or enable future economic land uses, such as converting mined areas into productive agricultural fields. In this review paper, we will address technosols, which are a class of anthropogenic soils defined by the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB-FAO) in 2006. These soils are constructed using human-made artefacts, which may include mining tailings and waste rock, organic residues such as vegetation debris from mine clearing, construction and demolition waste, water treatment sludge, and various other materials. These materials are readily available in mining areas, as they are often byproducts of mining operations. However, in many cases, they lack proper disposal and are stockpiled in heaps or dams, posing potential environmental and contamination risks. With appropriate geochemical and mineralogical assessments, as well as biological evaluations in the case of organic residues, these materials can be engineered into technosols according to their availability and intended future use. Due to their anthropogenic origin, technosols undergo pedogenic processes more rapidly than natural soils, often resulting in enhanced soil quality. This study aims to present the concept of technosols and showcase successful case studies, demonstrating how they can be constructed using mining tailings. Furthermore, it highlights their benefits through the lens of nature-based solutions and explores their potential to improve waste and tailings management in mining, as well as their role in mine closure and rehabilitation.
Keywords: nature-based solutions, soils, circular economy, mining waste, pedogenesis
References:
Agbeshie, AA, Awuah, R, Ofori-Adjei, NB, Ennison, M & Atta-Darkwa, T 2024, ‘Assessment of soil quality degradation impacted by topsoil stockpiling of a surface mining operation in a Tropical climate’, Scientific African, vol. 26, pp. 2468–2276,
Asensio, V, Covelo, EF & Kandeler, E 2013, ‘Soil management of copper mine tailing soils—Sludge amendment and tree vegetation could improve biological soil quality’, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 456–457, pp. 82–90.
Bolaños-Guerrón, D, Galarza, I, Llumiquinga, E, Toulkeridis, T & Cumbal, L 2023, ‘Design and Construction of a Prototype for Arsenic Retention in Mining-Contaminated Waters by Application of Nanoparticles-Based Technosols’, Sustainability, vol. 15, p. 1286,
Carabassa, V, Domene, X, Díaz, E & Alcañiz, JM 2020, ‘Mid-term effects on ecosystem services of quarry restoration with Technosols under Mediterranean conditions: 10-year impacts on soil organic carbon and vegetation development’, Restoration Ecology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 960–970,
Cohen-Shacham, E, Walters, G, Janzen, C & Maginnis, S (eds) 2016, Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges, IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland.
Colombini, G, Watteau, F & Auclere, A 2022, ‘Technosol rehabilitation strategies drive soil physico-chemical properties and fauna diversity on a former coking plant area’, Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 177, p. 104542,
.2022.104542
Duchaufour, P 1995, Pédologie: Sol, Végétation, Environnement (Pedology: Soil, Vegetation, Environment), Abrégés, Masson.
Echevarria, G & Morel, JL 2015, ‘Technosolos of mining areas’, Topics in soil Science, vol. 9, pp. 1–20.
Fabbri, D, Pizzol, R, Calza, P, Malandrino, M, Gaggero, E, Padoan, E & Ajmone-Marsan, F 2021, ‘Constructed technosols: a strategy toward a circular economy’, Applied Sciences, vol. 11, p. 3432,
Gonçalves, JO, Fruto, CM, Barranco, MJ, Oliveira, MLS, Ramos, CG 2022, ‘Recovery of degraded areas through technosols and mineral nanoparticles: a review’, Sustainability, vol. 14, p. 993,
Ghose, M 2001, ‘Management of topsoil for geo-environmental reclamation of coal mining areas’, Environmental Geology, vol. 40, pp. 1405–1410,
Hatje, V, Pedreira, RMA, de Rezende, CE, Schettini, CAF, Souza, GC, Marin, DC & Hackspacher, PC 2017, ‘The environmental impacts of one of the largest tailing dam failures worldwide’, Scientific Reports, vol. 7, p. 10706,
Hafeez, F, Spor, A, Breuil, MC, Schwartz, C, Martin-Laurent, F & Philippot, L 2012, ‘Distribution of bacteria and nitrogen-cycling microbial communities along constructed Technosol depth-profiles’, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 231–232, pp. 88–97.
Hayes, SM, Root, RA, Perdrial, N, Maier, RA & Chorover, J 2014, ‘Surficial weathering of iron sulfide mine tailings under semi-arid climate’, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 141, pp. 240–257,
Huot, H, Simonnot, MO & Morel, JM 2015, ‘Pedogenetic trends in soils formed in technogenic parent materials’, Soil Science, vol. 180, no. 4/5, pp. 182–192.
IUSS Working Group WRB 2015, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014: International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps (Update 2015), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF & Schuman GE 1997, ‘Soil quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial)’, Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 61, pp. 4–10.
Karlen, DL, Andrews, SS, Wienhold, BJ & Zobeck, TM 2008, ‘Soil quality assessment: past, present and future’, Journal of Integrated Bioscience, vol. 6, pp. 3–14.
Khlifa, R, Rivest, D, Grimond, L & Bélanger, N 2023, ‘Stability of carbon pools and fluxes of a Technosol along a 7-year reclamation chronosequence at an asbestos mine in Canada’, Ecological Engineering, vol. 86, p. 106839,
j.ecoleng.2022.106839
Lebrun, M, Miard, F, Trakal, L, Bourgerie, S & Morabito, D 2022, ‘The reduction of the As and Pb phytotoxicity of a former mine technosol depends on the amendment type and properties’, Chemospehere, vol. 300, p. 134592,
j.chemosphere.2022.134592
Leguédois, S, Seré, G, Auclerc, A, Cortet, J, Huot, H, Ouvrard, S, … Morel, JL 2016, ‘Modelling pedogenesis of Technosols’, Geoderma, vol. 262, pp. 199–212.
Lepsch, IF 2002, Formação e Conservação dos Solos (Soil Formation and Conservation), Oficina de textos, São Paulo.
Lima, AT, Mitchell, K, O’Connell, DW, Verhoeven, J & Van Cappellen, P 2016, ‘The legacy of surface mining: Remediation, restoration, reclamation and rehabilitation’, Environmental Science Policy, vol. 66, pp. 227–233.
Maes, J & Jacobs, S 2017, ‘Nature-based solutions for Europe’s sustainable development’, Conservation Letters, vol. 10, pp. 121–124,
Mancini, L & Sala, S 2018, ‘Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of Indicators frameworks’, Resources Policy, vol. 57, pp. 98 –111,
Martins, WBR, Schwartz, G, Ribeiro, SS, Ferreira, GC, Barbosa, RS, de Paula, MT, Barbosa, VM & Assis, F 2021, ‘Ecosystem restoration after bauxite mining: favorable indicators for technosols construction and soil management using liming and subsoiling’, New Forests, vol. 52, pp. 971–994,
Mingorance, MD, Franco, I & Rossini-Oliva, S 2017, ‘Application of different soil conditioners to restorate mine tailings with native (Cistus ladanifer L.) and nonnative species (Medicago sativa L.)’, Journal of Geochemical Exploration, vol. 174, pp. 35–45.
Montiel-Rozas, MM, Domínguez, MT, Madejon, E, Madejon, P, Pastorelli, R & Renella, G 2018, ‘Long-term effects of organic amendments on bacterial and fungal communities in a degraded Mediterranean soil’, Geoderma, vol. 332, pp. 20–28.
Otremba, K, Koztowski, M, Tatusko-Krygier, N, Pajak, M, Kotodziej, B & Bryk, M 2020, ‘Impact of alfalfa and NPK fertilization in agricultural reclamation on the transformation of Technosols in an area following lignite mining’, Land Degradation & Development, vol. 32, pp. 1179–1191,
Parente, CET, Lino, AS, Carvalho, GO, Pizzochero, AC, Azevedo-Silva, CE, Freitas, MO, … & Malm, O 2021, ‘First year after the Brumadinho tailings’ dam collapse: Spatial and seasonal variation of trace elements in sediments, fishes and macrophytes from the Paraopeba River, Brazil’, Environmental Research, vol. 193, p. 110526,
.
2020.110526
Pascaud, G, Soubrand, M, Lemee, L, Laduranty, J, El-Mufleh, A, Rabiet, M & Joussein, E 2017, ‘Molecular fingerprint of soil organic matter as an indicator of pedogenesis processes in technosols’, Journal of Soils and Sediments, vol. 17, pp. 340–351.
Perlatti, F, Otero, XL, Macias, F & Ferreira, TO 2014, ‘Geochemical speciation and dynamics of copper in tropical semi-arid soils exposed to metal-bearing mine wastes’, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 500-501, pp. 91–102.
Perlatti, F, Ferreira, TO, Roberto FAC, Romero, RE, Sartor, LR & Otero, XL 2015, ‘Trace metal/metalloid concentration in waste rock, soils and spontaneous plants in the surroundings of an abandoned mine in semi-arid NE-Brazil’, Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 5427–5441.
Perlatti, F, Martins, EP, Oliveira, DP, Ruiz, F, Asensio, V, Rezende, CF, Otero, XL & Ferreira, TO 2021, ‘Copper release from waste rocks in an abandoned mine (NE, Brazil) and its impacts on ecosystem environmental quality’, Chemosphere, vol. 262, p. 127843.
Ruiz, F, Perlatti, F, Oliveira, DP & Ferreira, T O 2020a, ‘Revealing tropical technosols as an alternative for mine reclamation and waste management’, Minerals, vol. 10, pp. 110.
Ruiz, F, Cherubin, MR & Ferreira, TO 2020b, ‘Soil quality assessment of constructed technosols: towards the validation of a promising strategy for land reclamation, waste management and the recovery of soil functions’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 276,
Ruiz, F, Rumpel, C, Silva, BM, Camargo, PB & Ferreira, TO 2023a, ‘Soil organic matter stabilization during early stages of technosol development from Ca, Mg and pyrite-rich parent material’, Catena, vol. 232, p. 107435,
Ruiz, F, Safanelli, JL, Perlatti, F, Cherubin, MR, Demattê, JAM, Cerri, CEP, Otero, XL, Rumpel, C & Ferreira, TO 2023b, ‘Constructing soils for climate-smart mining’, Communications Earth & Environment, vol. 4, p. 219,
Séré, G, Schwartz, C, Ouvrard, S, Renat, JC, Watteau, F, Villemin, G & Morel, JL 2010, ‘Early pedogenic evolution of constructed technosols’, Journal of Soils & Sediments, vol. 10, pp. 1246–1254.
Silva, BM, Queiroz, HM, Ferreira, AD, Ruiz, F & Ferreira, TO 2025, ‘Technosols made from iron mine tailings and construction and demolition waste as an alternative for sustainable solid waste management’, Land Degradation & Development, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 208–217,
Solé, P, Ferrer, D, Raya, I, Pous, M, Gonzàlez, R, Marañón-Jiménez, S, Alcañiz, JM & Carabassa, V 2023, ‘Physical and Chemical Properties of Limestone Quarry Technosols Used in the Restoration of Mediterranean Habitats’, Land, vol. 12, p. 1730.
Sonter, LJ, Herrera, D, Barrett, DJ, Galford, GL, Moran, CJ & Soares-Filho, BS, 2017, ‘Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon’, Nature Communication, vol. 8, p. 1013,
Uzarowicz, T & Skiba, S 2011, ‘Technogenic soils developed on mine spoils containing iron sulphides: mineral transformations as an indicator of pedogenesis’, Geoderma, vol. 163, pp. 95–108,
Zhang, X, Xia, H, Li, Z, Zhuang, P & Gao, B 2010, ‘Potential of four forage grasses in remediation of Cd and Zn contaminated soils’, Bioresources Technology, vol. 101, pp. 2063–2066.