Authors: Botes, A; Sheridan, C; Steyn, C

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_29

Cite As:
Botes, A, Sheridan, C & Steyn, C 2025, 'A probabilistic framework for mine closure financial liability assessment', in S Knutsson, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2025: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-14, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_29

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Mine closure remains a critical challenge for the global mining industry, particularly in ensuring adequate financial provisions to mitigate environmental risks and long-term liabilities. Traditional cost estimation models rely on deterministic approaches that often underestimate closure liabilities by failing to account for uncertainties related to future environmental conditions, regulatory changes, and economic variability. This paper introduces a probabilistic framework for assessing mine closure liability, which integrates an uncertainty-based cost estimation model. Unlike conventional models that provide single-point cost estimates based on itemised engineering breakdowns, this framework employs a Monte Carlo simulation approach to generate a probabilistic range of potential closure costs. The model incorporates multiple closure options per action/component, each assigned a probability of occurrence. Additionally, quantities and unit rates are represented as probability distributions rather than fixed values, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of variability and risk. The model dynamically refines closure cost projections using an interactive database integrating satellite imagery, computer vision, historical knowledge, artificial intelligence, and statistical modelling. This framework enhances accuracy and facilitates data-driven decision-making by applying the Pareto principle to action/components that are key cost drivers, such as water treatment and material movement. The output from the framework generates a probabilistic cost distribution, accounting for uncertainties and enabling the determination of confidence intervals for closure costs. This approach improves transparency, supports risk-adjusted financial assessments, and ensures a robust evaluation of closure liabilities. The proposed probabilistic model offers stakeholders, regulators, and financial auditors a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of mine closure costs. It facilitates rigorous financial provisioning by aligning closure liabilities with site-specific risk profiles. Ultimately, this framework enhances regulatory compliance and promotes financial transparency. Integrating risk-adjusted planning and informed decision-making supports more sustainable approaches to post-mining land rehabilitation. Doing so helps ensure that environmental restoration is adequately funded and that mine closure processes align with long-term, sustainable land use goals.

Keywords: mine closure, financial provisioning, probabilistic cost estimation, Monte Carlo simulation, environmental risk management, closure liabilities, unknown-unknowns

References:
AACE International 2020, Cost Estimate Classification System-as Applied in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction for the Process Industry (Recommended Practice No. 18R-97), Fairmont.
Bocking, KA, Kam, SN, Welch, DE & Williams, DA 2009, ‘Management of mine sites after closure’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2009: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 245–252,
Brock, D, Slight, M & McCombe, C 2019, ‘Financial concepts for mine closure: information document’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1587–1592, 
Byrne, G 2024, ‘Risks and cost estimates: the disconnect’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth,
pp. 47–58, 
Centre for Environmental Rights 2019, Environmental Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement at Mines: The Department of Mineral Resources and Energies Performance during the Financial Years 2017-31 March 2019, viewed 5 April 2025,
Department of Environmental Affairs 2015, Regulations Pertaining to the Financial Provision for Prospecting, Exploration, Mining or Production Operations, Pretoria.
Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment 2022, Proposed Regulations Pertaining to Financial Provisioning for the Mitigation and Rehabilitation of Environmental Damage Caused by Reconnaissance, Prospecting, Exploration, Mining or Production Operations, Pretoria.
Department of Mineral Resources and Energy 2022, Follow-up Performance Audit: on the Rehabilitation of Derelict and Ownerless Mines, Pretoria.
Eldarov, O 2025, Scenario Planning: Mapping Multiple Deal Outcomes and Their Impacts, viewed 5 Apr 2025,
Fletcher, D, Hutton, A & Dick, C 2011, ‘The “smoking gun” of detailed mine closure cost over-run – a review using case studies of the real costs associated with the demolition and removal of infrastructure in mine closure’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & A Beersing (eds), Mine Closure 2011: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 97–106, 
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres 2024, ‘AI and remote sensing data sets advance sustainable mining and Earth observation’, Phys Org, viewed 5 Apr 2025,
Hutchison, I & Dettore, R 2011, ‘Statistical and probabilistic closure cost estimating’, Tailings and Mine Waste Conference, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, pp. 1–13.
International Council on Mining and Metals 2019, Integrated Mine Closure: Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn, London.
Knight, A 2024, The Hidden Costs of Coalmines’ Unquenchable Thirst: Water-Related Risks are Eroding Coal’s Profitability, viewed 5 April 2025,
%20thirst_Mar24.pdf
McKenna, PB, Lechner, AM, Phinn, S & Erskine, PD 2020, ‘Remote sensing of mine site rehabilitation for ecological outcomes: a global systematic review’, Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 21,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2011, NASA Risk Management Handbook: Version 1.0, Washington D.C.
Neubauer, AA 2022, ‘Closure costing/rehabilitation liability maths: why doesn’t it add up?’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1179–1192,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Reinforcement 2020, Handbook for Calculation of Reclamation Bond Amounts, Washinton D.C.
Poole, AA 2023, ‘Good GIS functionality and practices in mine closure planning’, in B Abbasi, J Parshley, A Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2023: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth,
Rapson, G & Novotny, PA 2022, ‘Final draft of the replacement NEMA financial provisioning regulations published’, Webber Wentzel, viewed 5 April 2025,
Republic of South Africa 1998, National Environmental Management Act, Cape Town.
Samaei M, Stothard P, Shirani Faradonbeh RS, Topal E & Jang H 2024 ‘Mine closure surveillance and feasibility of UAV–AI–MR technology: a review study’, Minerals, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 110,
Sanders, J, Slingerland, N & Murphy, D 2024, ‘Closing the gap: closure cost estimation trends and pathways to improved maturity’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1149–1162,
Shrivastava, NK 2014, ‘A model to develop and use risk contingency reserve’, Proceedings of the PMI® Global Congress - North America, Phoenix.
Watson, I & Olalde, M 2019, ‘The state of mine closure in South Africa – what the numbers say’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 119, no.7, pp. 639–645,




© Copyright 2025, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au