DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_32
Cite As:
Saiang, D & Lus, W 2025, 'Repurposing of mine infrastructure at closure', in S Knutsson, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds),
Mine Closure 2025: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-11,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_32
Abstract:
The repurposing of mine infrastructure should be considered an essential part of mine closure planning. In many underdeveloped countries, mines usually have the most well-developed infrastructure, from energy infrastructure to social infrastructure. The host governments of these countries often lack the ability to utilise this infrastructure after mine closure. Due to the need for sustainable and responsible mining, some mining companies have started to take it upon themselves to plan how the mining infrastructure can be repurposed after mine closure. This paper presents one such example, where the mining company developed the concept of integrated infrastructure to service both the mine and the civil society during both the operational and closure phases of the mine. Located in one of the harshest environments on Earth, with high rainfall, rugged terrain and high seismicity, dedicated mine waste storage infrastructure was planned for the Frieda River Copper-Gold Project in Papua New Guinea. The purpose of the infrastructure, coined by Xstrata PLC as an ‘integrated storage facility’, is to serve as massive underwater storage for the mine waste. At the same time, it was developed to utilise the cover water to generate electricity for the mine and the region, with potential to export access power across borders. Even though challenging and ambitious, the concept remains to be further explored both technically and fiscally, as it has the potential to be of significant economic benefit for Papua New Guinea.
Keywords: integrated storage facility, mine waste storage, rugged terrain, high rainfall, high seismicity, Frieda River Copper-Gold Project, policy framework
References:
ANCOLD 2012, Guidelines on the Consequence Categories for Dams, Hobart.
Brooks, JA 1963, Earthquake Activity and Seismic Risks in Papua & New Guinea, record no. 1963/162, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Commonwealth of Australia.
CEPA 2002, Environmental Act 2000, Papua New Guinea.
Coffey 2018a, Frieda River Limited Sepik Development Project Environmental Impact Assessment: Attachment 2a – Frieda River Copper-Gold Project Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan.
Coffey 2018b, Frieda River Limited Sepik Development Project Environmental Impact Statement: Attachment 2b – Frieda River Hydroelectric Project Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan.
Coffey 2018c, Frieda River Limited, Sepik Development Project Environmental Impact Assessment: Appendix 3a – Frieda River CopperGold Project Conceptual Mine Closure Plan.
Coffey 2018d, Frieda River Limited Sepik Development Project Environmental Impact Assessment: Appendix 3b – Frieda River Hydroelectric Project Conceptual Closure Plan.
Chopra, AK & Chakrabarti, P 1973, ‘The Koyna earthquake and the damage to Koyna Dam’, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 381–397.
Douglas Partners 2009, Frieda River Extended Scoping Study.
IFC 2012, Guidance Notes: Performance Standards on Social and Environmental Sustainability, Washington.
Mineral Resources Authority 2012, The Papua New Guinea Mining Policy Handbook 2012, Konedobu.
Mineral Resources Authority and Department of Mineral Policy and Geohazards Management 2015, Mining Project Closure Policy – Papua New Guinea, Mineral Resources Authority and Department of Mineral Policy and Geohazards Management, Konedobu.
Saiang, D, Torovi, M, Warigen, DY & Wiruk, E 2020, ‘Integrated storage facility — a new concept for mine waste storage’, Tailings and Mine Waste 2020: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Tailings and Mine Waste, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, pp. 477–489.
SRK Consulting Australasia 2018, Frieda River Hydroelectric Project Dam Break Analysis, Perth.
USGS 1935,
, viewed June 2025.
USGS 2011,
, viewed June 2025.
USGS 2016,
, viewed June 2025.
USGS 2018,
, viewed June 2025.
USGS 2023,
, viewed June 2025.