Post-mining land use selection: a framework for long-term value creation
|
Authors: Selame, M; Simpson, G Open access courtesy of:
|
DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_35
Cite As:
Selame, M & Simpson, G 2025, 'Post-mining land use selection: a framework for long-term value creation', in S Knutsson, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2025: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-14, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_35
Abstract:
The planning process for selecting post-mining land (PMLU) uses is driven by various factors such as stakeholder expectations, regulatory requirements, social and environmental impacts, cost and risks. With many elements that need to be carefully considered in selecting PMLUs, the identification and selection process may present significant challenges for mining companies. Existing guidelines and standards offer general guidance on repurposing mine sites. Due to their general nature, however, they often lack detailed guidance on actionable steps that could be undertaken. This paper aims to address some of these gaps through a literature review and also draws on our experiences on closure projects across Australia: first, by identifying key constraints and challenges associated with PMLU planning; and secondly, by developing a conceptual framework that aids in identifying and evaluating baseline and alternate PMLUs per mining domain. Determining the land capabilities, as well as the constraints and opportunities per domain, are key components of the proposed framework. The implementation of a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis per domain is proposed. This process enables more effective identification and mapping of potential PMLUs. A fatal flaw analysis is proposed through the development of a land suitability assessment, with the intent of shortlisting the possible PMLU options based on their technical feasibility. A multi-criteria analysis and financial modelling are proposed as the final steps in the framework for identifying preferred PMLUs per domain. A well-structured and robust PMLU planning framework provides transparency to stakeholders and greater certainty that potential opportunities for social and economic benefits will not be neglected.
Keywords: mine closure, post-mining land use, framework, repurposing, transition
References:
ABARES 2016, The Australian Land Use and Management Classification, version 8, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra.
ABC 2022, ‘Ranger uranium mine rehabilitation costs could blow out to $2.2 billion, Energy Resources tells ASX’, ABC News, viewed 3 March 2025,
100798666
Amaro, SL , Barbosa, S, Ammerer, G, Bruno, A, Guimera, J, Orfanoudakis, I & Hitch, M 2022, ‘Multi-criteria decision analysis for evaluating transitional and post-mining options—an innovative perspective from the EIT ReviRIS Project’, Sustainability, vol. 14.
Amirshenava, S & Osanloo, M 2021, ‘Mined land suitability assessment: a semi-quantitative approach based on a new classification of post-mining land uses’, International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, vol. 25, issue 10, pp. 743–763,
APEC 2018, Mine Closure Checklist for Governments, Singapore.
Bangian, AH, Ataei, M, Sayadi, M & Gholinejad, A 2012, ‘Optimising post-mining land use for pit area in open-pit mining using fuzzy decision making method’, International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, pp. 613–628.
Beer, A, Hasmal-Mackenzie, F, Weller, S, Davies, A, Cote, C, Ziemski, M & Keenan, J 2021, Post-Mining Land Uses – A Literature Review, CRC Time Limited, Perth.
Clay, M, Nicolson, L, Dunlop, J & Purtill, J 2024, A Review of Research and Tools for Grazing as a Post-Mining Land Use in Queensland: Technical Paper, Office of the Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner, Brisbane.
Cote, C, Holloway, E, Dunlop, J & Chrystal, R 2023, Leading Practice Approaches to Select Post-Mining Land Uses For Residual Mine Voids: Technical Paper, Office of the Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner, Brisbane.
Department of Regional NSW 2023, Practical Guide: Post Mining Land Use, Government of NSW.
Dunlop, J, Nicolson, L, Clay, M & Purtill, J 2024, Aquatic Ecosystems in Post-Mining Landscapes: Technical Paper, Office of the Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner, Brisbane.
FAO 2025, Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual, viewed 5 April 2025,
Hattingh, R, Williams, DJ & Corder, G 2019, ‘Applying a regional land use approach to mine closure: opportunities for restoring and regenerating mine-disturbed regional landscapes’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 951–968,
/ACG_rep/1915_75_Hattingh
International Council on Mining and Metals 2025, Integrated Mine Closure: Good Practice Guide 3rd Edition, London.
Mborah, C, Bansah, KJ & Boateng, MK 2016, ‘Evaluating Alternate Post-Mining Land-Uses: A Review’, Environment and Pollutions, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–22.
Murphy, DP, Fromm, J, Bairstow, R & Meunier, D 2019, ‘A repurposing framework for alignment of regional development and mine closure’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 789–802,
Narrei, S & Osanloo, M 2011, ‘Post-mining land-use methods optimum ranking, using multi attribute decision techniques with regard to sustainable resource management’, OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 65–76.
lcdocs/submissions/86838/0059%20NSW%20Minerals%20Council.pdf
Pagouni, C, Pavloudakis, F, Kapageridis, I & Yiannakaou, A 2024, ‘Transitional and post-mining land uses: a global review of regulatory frameworks, decision-making criteria, and methods’, Land, vol. 13, vol. 7, pp. 1–27.
Parliament of NSW 2025, Beneficial and Productive Post Mining Land Use, Standing Committee on State Development.
Sales Rosa, J, Sanchez, L, Morrison-Saunders, A, 2018, ‘Getting to ‘agreed’ post-mining land use – an ecosystem services approach’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 220–229.
Servou, A, Paraskevis, N, Roumpos, C & Pavloudakis, F 2023, ‘A Geospatial analysis model for the selection of post-mining land uses in surface lignite mines: application in the Ptolemais Mines, Greece’, Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 19.
Simpson, GB, Ferguson, K, Slingerland, N & Hattingh, R 2024, ‘Integrating the Sustainable Development Goals into post-mining land use selection’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 143–156,
Soltanmohammadi, H, Osanloo, M & Aghajani Bazzazi, A 2010, ‘An analytical approach with a reliable logic and a ranking policy for post-mining land-use determination’, Land Use Policy, vol. 27, pp. 364–372.
Spain, CS, Nuske, S & Gagen, EJ 2025, Evaluating Methods for Assessing Native Ecosystem Mine Rehabilitation Success, Office of the Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner, Brisbane.
Unger, C, Lechner, A, Kenway, J, Glenn, V & Walton, A 2015, ‘A jurisdictional maturity model for risk management, accountability and continual improvement of abandoned mine remediation programs’, Resources Policy, vol. 43, pp. 1–10.
University of Michigan 2025, Mitigating the Toxic Remnants of the Berkeley Pit Mine, viewed 28 March 2025,
Wang, J, Zhao, F, Yang, J & Li, X 2017, ‘Mining site reclamation planning based on land suitability analysis and ecosystem services evaluation: a case study in Liaoning Province, China’, Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 6,
Werner, T, Bach, P, Yellishetty, M, Amirpoorsaeed, F, Walsh, S, Miller, A & Wu, X 2020, ‘A geospatial database for effective mine rehabilitation in Australia’, Minerals, vol. 10, pp. 1–21.
Whitbread-Abrutat, P & Lowe, R 2024, 102 Things to Do With a Hole in the Ground, Eden Project, Cornwall.
Worden, S, Svobodova, K, Cote, C & Bolz, P 2024, ‘Regional post-mining land use assessment: an interdisciplinary approach’, Resources Policy, vol. 89.
Yellishetty, M & Bach, P, 2023, ‘Cleaning up Australia’s 80,000 disused mines is a huge job – but the payoffs can outweigh the costs’, The Conversation, viewed 20 April 2025,
Young, R, Manero, A, Miller, A, Kragt, M, Standish, R, Jasper, D & Boggs, G 2019, A Framework for Developing Mine-Site Completion Criteria for Western Australia, The Western Australian Biodiversity Science Institute, Perth.
© Copyright 2025, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au