Planning the end from the beginning: embedding stakeholder engagement in post-mining land use decisions

Authors: Hood, A; Neddenriep, K; Crossley, C; Bungartz, L; Dillon, T

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_40

Cite As:
Hood, A, Neddenriep, K, Crossley, C, Bungartz, L & Dillon, T 2025, 'Planning the end from the beginning: embedding stakeholder engagement in post-mining land use decisions', in S Knutsson, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2025: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-13, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_40

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
For mine planning to be truly successful, it must go beyond considering operational efficiencies. Decisions must also consider an end land use vision that’s been informed and supported by local communities. By addressing community needs from the outset, mining projects can deliver meaningful economic, social, and environmental benefits both during operations and long after closure. Integrating stakeholder input early in permitting and planning phases aligns mine site layouts and closure strategies with broader community development objectives, helping to meet immediate and long-term needs. This paper explores how early and sustained stakeholder engagement can shape post-mining land use plans that are grounded in the values and priorities of mine-affected communities, while also being realistically achievable. Early involvement of stakeholders including youth, regulatory authorities, and community leaders, encourages open dialogue from the onset, captures evolving of community aspirations, and fosters shared decision-making. This inclusive process builds trust and strengthens local support. Through workshops, consultations, and collaborative planning, communities contribute local knowledge, helping to anticipate challenges and co-develop innovative, context sensitive solutions. This approach mitigates potential conflicts during project implementation and establishes a foundation for sustainable communities long after mine closure. Experience demonstrates that early and transparent collaboration transforms mine planning into a mutually beneficial process, improving both operational performance and the realisation of meaningful post-mining land use. The approach presented in this paper offers a practical model for integrating stakeholder feedback into strategic end land use planning decisions, promoting resilient landscapes and long-term community partnerships. Proactive engagement strategies not only reduce post-mining risks, but also support local economic development and environmental restoration, contributing meaningfully to the global discourse on sustainable mining practices.

Keywords: mine closure planning, stakeholder engagement, participatory planning, Indigenous engagement, post-mining land use, economic transition, cultural heritage, social impact assessment

References:
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation 2018, Mine Closure Checklist for Governments, Singapore,
2018/03/mine-closure---checklist-for-governments
Bainton, NA & Holcombe, S 2018, ‘A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure’, Resources Policy, vol. 59, pp. 468–478.
Boulay, A & Bouffard, F 2017, Improving Mine Closure Governance in Canada: A Proposal for Reform, Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Westmount.
Brady, C, Christophersen, P & O’Brien, J 2021, ‘Incorporating Indigenous knowledge in mine closure: Ranger Uranium Mine’, The Royal Society of Victoria Proceedings, vol. 133, pp. 18–22.
Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining 2021, Community Participation in Mine Closure: Scoping Study, The University of Queensland, St Lucia.
Commonwealth of Australia 2020, Never Again: Inquiry Into the Destruction of 46,000 Year Old Caves at the Juukan Gorge in the Pilbara Region of Western Australia—Interim Report (Australia), Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia, Canberra.
Crossley, C 2023, Building Social Performance into Mine Closure Planning: The Path to a Positive Legacy, Master’s project report, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
ERM 2024, Strategic Communications Campaign Report: Lithium Project Stakeholder Outcomes: Case Study, London.
ERM 2025, Strategic Closure Visioning Workshop: Case Study, London.
Esteves, AM, Factor, G, Vanclay, F, Götzmann, N & Moreira, S 2017, ‘Adapting social impact assessment to address a project’s human rights impacts and risks’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 67, pp. 73–87,
Franks, DM, Davis, R, Bebbington, AJ, Ali, SH, Kemp, D & Scurrah, M 2014, ‘Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 21, pp. 7576–7581,
Franks, DM, Everingham, J & Brereton, D 2012, Social Impact Assessment of Resource Projects, International Mining for Development Centre.
Getty, R & Morrison-Saunders, A 2020, ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of integrating the environmental impact assessment and mine closure planning processes’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 82, no. 106366,
j.eiar.2020.106366
Government of Canada 2019, Impact Assessment Act, S.C. 2019, c. 28, s. 1,
Hopkins, A & Kemp, D 2021, Credibility Crisis: Brumadinho and the Politics of Mining Industry Reform, CCH Australia, Macquarie Park.
International Council on Mining and Metals 2019, Integrated Mine Closure: Good Practice Guide, 2nd edn, London,
International Finance Corporation 2012, Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability,
International Organization for Standardization 2021, ISO 21795-1:2021 - Mine closure and reclamation planning — Part 1: Requirements and Guidelines, Geneva.
Lawrence, R 2022, ‘Rehabilitating Ranger Uranium Mine: scientific uncertainty, deep futures and the production of ignorance’, Environmental Politics.
McLellan, BC, Corder, GD, Giurco, D & Green, S 2019, ‘Incorporating sustainable development in the design of mineral processing operations – Review and analysis of current approaches’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 231, pp. 1198–1216,
McMahon, G & Moreira, S 2014, The Contribution of the Mining Sector to Socioeconomic and Human Development, Extractive Industries for Development Series, World Bank, Washington D.C.
Mhlanga, R, Nel, E & Rogerson, CM 2021, ‘Land reform, tenure security and post-mining land use transitions in South Africa’, Land Use Policy, vol. 103, no. 105324,
Monosky, M & Keeling, A 2021a, ‘Planning for social and community-engaged closure: A comparison of mine closure plans from Canada’s territorial and provincial North’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 277, no. 111324.
Monosky, M & Keeling, A 2021b, ‘Social Considerations in Mine Closure: Exploring Policy and Practice in Nunavik, Quebec’, Northern Review, vol. 52, no. 52.
Owen, JR, Kemp, D, Lèbre, É, Svobodova, K & Pérez Murillo, G 2020, ‘Catastrophic tailings dam failures and disaster risk disclosure’, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 42, no. 101361,
Pan, Y, Duddigan, S, Devanadera, MCE & Tibbett, M 2024, ‘Stakeholder engagement and ecosystem services for mine closure’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 285–294, 
Paul, A, Beier, N & Barsi, D 2022, ‘Comparing adaptive management and the observational method for mine closure and reclamation’, paper presented at the 7th International Oil Sands Tailings Conference, Edmonton.
Reed, MS, Graves, A, Dandy, N, Posthumus, H, Hubacek, K, Morris, J, … Stringer, LC 2009, ‘Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1933–1949.
Smith, HD 2012, ‘Post-closure planning for Ranger Uranium Mine’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2012: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 667–674,
Streit, S, Cagnier, N, Gugerell, K & Tost, M 2021, D1.2. Inventory of Actual Planning Practices and Processes in the Context of Formal-Legal Procedure and Policy, List of Challenges, Barriers and Enablers, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna,
20and%20processes.pdf
Teck Alaska Incorporated 2009, Red Dog Mine Closure and Reclamation Plan,
United Nations 2007, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP): Framework for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Globally,
Ural, D & Demir, G 2018, ‘A review on post-mining land use and land reuse options’, Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 77, no. 20.
World Bank 2018, Managing Coal Mine Closure: Achieving a Just Transition for All, Washington D.C.
Ya Water Research Commission 2024, Developing Mine Closure Risk Ratings and a Post-Closure Opportunities Framework for South Africa,
Yameogo, T 2022, ESG Challenges Mining and Metals Companies Are Facing—How Mining and Metals Companies Are Responding to Challenges and Embracing Opportunities in the Energy Transition and Effort to Decarbonize, EY,




© Copyright 2025, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au