Challenges of mine closure due to asbestos banning

Authors: Reis, M; Aragão, G; Ribeiro, I

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_88

Cite As:
Reis, M, Aragão, G & Ribeiro, I 2025, 'Challenges of mine closure due to asbestos banning', in S Knutsson, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2025: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-7, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_88

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The use of asbestos is a controversial issue that raises significant concern within society. Because of this, asbestos mining has been banned in several countries around the world. In Brazil, where the mineral domestic consumption was prohibited some years ago, there is the potential need for asbestos mines to suddenly close due to a legal determination. Although maintaining the operation of an asbestos mine demands a series of measures to mitigate associated impacts, its closure should also be carried out with special attention due to potential risks, and environmental and socio-economic aspects must be considered. It is important that the operator has enough time to produce necessary information, as well as to provision the financial resources required to execute closure activities. This period is also beneficial for the community, which seeks a smoother transition from a scenario in which mining represents a significant employment source to one in which it does not exist. Understanding the risks associated with sudden closure and considering them when making decisions about the project’s lifecycle are fundamental steps in the process as they contribute to a post-closure scenario with greater socio-economic sustainability and a lower risk of environmental liabilities.

Keywords: asbestos mine closure, legal closure challenges, post-mining socio-economic sustainability, environmental liability

References:
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas 2024a, Resíduos Sólidos - Classificação - Parte 1: Requisitos de Classificação (Solid Waste - Classification - Part 1: Classification Requirements), ABNT NBR 10004-1:2024, Rio de Janeiro.
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas 2024b, Resíduos Sólidos - Classificação - Parte 2: Sistema Geral de Classificação de Resíduos (SGCR) (Solid Waste - Classification - Part 2: General Waste Classification System (GWCS)), ABNT NBR 10004-2:2024, Rio de Janeiro.
Centro de Tecnologia Mineral 2012, Consequências do Encerramento da Exploração do Amianto em Bom Jesus da Serra (BA) (Consequences of the Closure of Asbestos Mining in Bom Jesus da Serra (BA)), viewed 22 April 2025,
Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente, Resolução CONAMA Nº 348, de 16 de Agosto de 2004 - Altera a Resolução CONAMA n° 307, de 5 de julho de 2002, Incluindo o Amianto na Classe de Resíduos Perigosos (Amends CONAMA Resolution N°. 307, of July 5, 2002, to Include Asbestos in the Hazardous Waste Class), Brazil.
Federative Republic of Brazil 1995, LEI Nº 9.055, DE 1 DE JUNHO DE 1995 - Disciplina a Extração, Industrialização, Utilização, Comercialização e Transporte do Asbesto/Amianto e dos Produtos que o Contenham, Bem Como das Fibras Naturais e Artificiais, de Qualquer Origem, Utilizadas Para o Mesmo fim e dá Outras Providências (Regulates the Extraction, Industrialization, Use, Commercialisation, and Transport of Asbestos and Products Containing it, as Well as Natural and Artificial Fibres, of Any Origin, Used for the Same Purpose, and Makes Other Provisions), Brazil.
Governo do Estado de Goiás 2019, Lei N° 20.514, de 16 de Julho de 2019, Autoriza, para fins Exclusivos de Exportação, a Extração e o Beneficiamento do Amianto da Variedade Crisotila no Estado de Goiás, Brasil (Authorises the Extraction and Processing of Chrysotile Asbestos in the State of Goiás, Brazil, Exclusively for Export Purposes),
pesquisa_legislacao/100717/lei-20514
Supremo Tribunal Federal 2017a, Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 3.937 (Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 3937), Brazil.
Supremo Tribunal Federal 2017b, Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental 109 (Claim of Non-Compliance with a Fundamental Precept), Brazil.
World Health Organization 1986, Environmental Health Criteria 53 (EHC 53): Asbestos and Other Natural Mineral Fibres, Geneva.




© Copyright 2025, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au