DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_95
Cite As:
Hall, A, Lee, D, Flanagan, M, Sharman, T, Grobler, F & Barros, N 2025, 'The impact of enhanced sustainability outcomes on the optimal open pit to underground transition', in S Knutsson, AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds),
Mine Closure 2025: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-17,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2515_95
Abstract:
Sustainability considerations, including environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects are indeed a critical matter for the mining industry. Today, sustainability performance and credentials permeate all aspects of mineral projects, influencing everything from initial project evaluation through to operations and mine closure, and overarching corporate governance objectives.
The decision to transition from open pit to underground operations is a multifaceted challenge, devoid of a one-size-fits-all solution. Traditionally, this decision hinged predominantly on economic factors such as mining costs, and technical risks; with open pit mines often perceived as offering greater certainty. However, underground mining typically encompasses many material advantages from a broader sustainability perspective, including a smaller disturbance footprint; lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; greater utilisation of natural resources (better resources stewardship, less waste generation); less societal disruption; and less financial impact associated with closure. Consequently, integrating sustainability considerations into the evaluation of the optimal transition point from open pit to underground operations may expedite the transition, and lead to a smaller open pit and the earlier development of an underground mine.
This paper identifies the range of mining and environmental technical factors, as well as other technological and socio-economic factors that influence the determination of the optimal transition point from open pit to underground mining – when applied in brownfield or adoption of underground mining exclusively in a greenfield project if deemed optimal. Further expanding on conventions through extensive practical experience, case studies, and advanced modelling techniques, the authors demonstrate the substantial impact that achieving superior sustainability performance outcomes has on this decision.
Keywords: sustainability, ESG, underground, open pit, transition, optimisation, post-mining transition, case study
References:
Bonini, S & Swartz, S 2014, ‘Profits with purpose: How organising for sustainability can benefit the bottom line’, McKinsey & Company.
CRIRSCO 2024, Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Definitions Guide, International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM),
Hafner, A, Janoska, P & Lee, C 2018, The Importance of Real-world Policy Packages to Drive Energy Transitions, International Energy Agency,
Hall, BE 2014, ‘Cut-off grades and optimising the strategic mine plan’, Australasian Institute of Mining and MetallurgySpectrum Series, no. 20, pp. 100–311.
ICMM 2022, Mining Principles: Performance Expectations, London,
ICMM 2024, Indigenous Peoples and Mining Position Statement, London,
McCluskey, J & Barros, N 2016, ‘Life of asset planning, uncertainty and value optimisation of the iron ore business – from exploration, to market, to closure’, Mining Technology, vol. 125, no.1, pp.15–21.
Murray, S 2022, ‘When should business take a stand?’, Financial Times,
Rio Tinto 2022, Scania and Rio Tinto Agree to Develop Autonomous Haulage Solutions Supporting a Pathway to Lower Emissions
Mining, viewed 22 April 2025,
World Bank 2022, States and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022.