Authors: Hamman, E; Venter, J; du Plooy, K; de Souza, J

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2535_0.01

Cite As:
Hamman, E, Venter, J, du Plooy, K & de Souza, J 2025, 'Governance considerations for geotechnical engineering in risk management', in JJ Potter & J Wesseloo (eds), SSIM 2025: Fourth International Slope Stability in Mining Conference, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2535_0.01

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Mining companies recognise that the sustainability of its business is, amongst other factors, dependent upon efficient risk management in the exploration, extraction and processing of mineral resources, including sound mine excavation design, operational execution and validation practices. In the mining industry, discussions on risk management are often focused on the process, particularly the risk assessment component, with insufficient attention given to the foundation principles and the supporting framework, as defined for example in ISO 31000. However, at an executive level, management remains accountable for risk management but may not possess the necessary expertise required to fully grasp its complexities. It is therefore incumbent upon the various technical disciplines to clearly articulate the coordinated activities required for senior management to direct and control the company with respect to its risk attitude and appetite. The paper provides guidance on business processes that incorporates elements from both the risk management principles and framework to support a company-specific governance approach, tailored to its unique operational context, that will benefit the business. This is important to risk owners and technical personnel involved with risk criteria. Notably, where this involves geotechnical engineering, there needs to be transparent, repeatable, robust business processes in place for data management, geotechnical design, operational execution, performance validation, competency management, records management, and site-based assurance. These business processes are discussed by highlighting the specific challenges in the geotechnical engineering discipline and addressing leadership, group risk and project management, mineral resource and reserve reporting, critical hazard management and a group geotechnical engineering standard.

Keywords: geotechnical engineering, risk management, governance, standard

References:
Bieniawski, ZT 1991, ‘In search of a design methodology for rock mechanics’, in J‐C Roegiers (ed.), Rock Mechanics as a Multidisciplinary Science: Proceedings of the 32nd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1027–1036.
Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety 2019, Ground Control for Western Australian Mining Operations – Code of Practice, Perth.
du Plooy, K & Hamman, ECF 2024, ‘The role of a geotechnical risk profile to manage financial expectations associated with underground mine plans’, in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 921–928,
Hamman, E 2023, Geotechnical Engineering Framework Rev.2, AngloGold Ashanti Chief Technical Office, Perth.
Hamman, ECF & Venter, J 2019, ‘Using qualitative risk assessment as a leading indicator for geotechnical risk in mining’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), MGR 2019: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 127–156,
Hamman, ECF, du Plooy, DJ & Seery, JM 2017, ‘Data management and geotechnical models’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Deep Mining 2017: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 461–487,
Human, L 2015, ‘Systematic review and compliance audits of ground control management plans’, AusIMM Bulletin.
International Organization for Standardization 2018, ISO 31000 Risk Management – Guidelines, Geneva.
Stacey, TR 2009, ‘The importance of engineering design with regard to safety in mining’, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Hard Rock Safe Safety Conference, South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, pp. 291–304.
Venter, J & Hamman, E 2018a, ‘A temporal safety risk model for open pit slope management’, Slope Stability 2018 Symposium, Asociacion National de Ingenieros de Minas & Colegio Oficial de Ingenieros de Minas Del Sur, Seville.
Venter, J & Hamman, E 2018b, ‘Determining the optimum slope angle using an integrated mine planning approach’, Slope Stability 2018 Symposium, Asociacion National de Ingenieros de Minas & Colegio Oficial de Ingenieros de Minas Del Sur, Seville.
Venter, J, Hamman, E, Fernandez, S & Holland, C 2024, ‘A simplified geotechnical risk profile for production scenarios in open pit mines’, Slope Stability 2024 Symposium, Brazilian Society of Geotechnical Engineering, Belo Horizonte.
WorkSafe Western Australia 2025, Principal Mining Hazard Management Plans: Guide, Department of Local Government, Industry Regulation and Safety, Perth.




© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au