Measurement of the shear strength of centrifuged oil sands tailings using different soil mechanics procedures

Authors: Kabwe, LK; Wilson, W; Barsi, D

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2555_24

Cite As:
Kabwe, LK, Wilson, W & Barsi, D 2025, 'Measurement of the shear strength of centrifuged oil sands tailings using different soil mechanics procedures', in AB Fourie, A Copeland, V Daigle & C MacRobert (eds), Paste 2025: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 343-358, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2555_24

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Shear strength is an important engineering property in the design and closure of tailings dams. The stability of a tailings dam depends upon the strength of the tailings. Alberta oil sands tailings dams have a footprint much larger than typical metal mines, averaging 4 km2, with the largest near 15 km2. Approximately 1.3 billion cubic metres of mature fine tailings (MFT) have been stored in these tailings dams. Significant dewatering and treatment of the MFT are required to achieve solids contents and strengths sufficient to support reclamation. Centrifugation is currently one of the potential technologies for converting MFT into a material with sufficient strength to support trafficability. In this research study, a large strain consolidation test (LSC) with shear strength, consolidated undrained triaxial test (UD-TR), consolidated drained direct shear (D-DS) test and a single-step Tempe cell test (SS-Tempe cell) were performed on an oil sands centrifuged tailings cake (Ccake) sample to measure the two shear strength parameters: apparent cohesion (c) and effective friction angle ('). The UD-TR and D-DS techniques provided comparable ' values of 20.7° and 22.9°, respectively, and this is because remoulding soil destroys any previous layering or structure that might have been present, and the resulting sample is more or less homogeneous. The LSC provided a lower value of ' of 17.8° due to the use of the vane shear device in the LSC test that destroyed the fabric and decreased the value of '. The SSTempe cell produced a non-linear shear strength envelope due to suction that increased ' (26°) and shear strength of the soil sample. The remoulded and consolidated C-cake sample tested in this study has a (c) of zero. The values of (c) and ' obtained indicated that the C-cake sample tested was very soft clay. Although these four different devices can provide similar shear strength parameter results, they have marked differences in complexity and cost. The DS and SS-Tempe cell devices are simple and cheap. The TR and LSC devices are complex, expensive and time-consuming. However, the UD-TR has the advantage over the other test methods in that specimen drainage can be controlled, pore pressure can be measured and the results are accurate. The results of the two strength parameters are crucial in any stability analyses of slopes against failure and landslides.

Keywords: large strength consolidation, direct shear, triaxial, single-step Tempe cell, centrifuged cake, peak shear strength

References:
Alberta Energy Regulator 2018, ST98: 2018 Alberta’s Energy Reserves & Supply/Demand Outlook, Calgary.
Abdel-Ghaffar, MEM 1990, The Meaning and Practical Significance of the Cohesion Intercept in Soil Mechanics, PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Abdulnabi, A, Amoako, K, Moran, D, Vanadara, K, Aldaeef, AA, Esmaelizadeah, A, … Simms, PH 2021, ‘Evaluation of candidate polymers to maximize the geotechnical performance of oil sands tailings’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 359–371.
Affendi, A, Faisal, A & Chandrasegaran, S 1994, ‘Triaxial shear strength tests on partially saturated residual soils’, Geotropika, Malacca.
Amoako, KA, Abdulnabi, A, Beier, NA, Soares, J & Simms, PH 2020, ‘Long-term consolidation of two new polymer treatments of oil sands fluid fine tailings’, Proceedings of the 73rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference, The Canadian Geotechnical Society, Vancouver.
ASTM International 2005, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass, West Conshohocken.
ASTM International 2016, Test Method for Laboratory Miniature Vane Shear Test for Saturated Fine-Grained Clayey Soil, West Conshohocken, org/10.1520/D4648_D4648M-16
ASTM International 2011, Standard Test Method for Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils (Committee D-18 on Soil and Rock), West Conshohocken.
ASTM International 2023, Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions, Annual Book of ASTM Standards 4 (1994), West Conshohocken, 10.1520/D3080_D3080M-23
ASTM International 2023, Standard Test Method for Approximating the Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils by the Handheld Vane Shear Device (ASTM D8121/D8121M-19), West Conshohocken, 10.1520/D8121_D8121M-23
Casagrande, A & Poulos, SJ 1964, Fourth Report on Investigation of Stress-Deformation and Strength Characteristics of Compacted Clays, Harvard Soil Mechanics Series no. 74, Harvard University, Cambridge.
Castellanos, BA & Brandon, TL 2013, ‘A comparison between the shear strength measured with Direct Shear and Triaxial devices on undisturbed and remolded soil’, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Presses des Ponts, Paris.
Craig, RF 1992, Soil Mechanics, 5th edn, Chapman & Hall, London.
Escario, V & Saez, J 1986, ‘The shear strength of partly saturated soils’, Géotechnique, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 453–456.
Fredlund, DG & NR Morgenstern 1977, ‘Stress state variables for unsaturated soils’, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 447–466.
Fredlund, DG, Morgenstern, NR & Widger, RA, 1978, ‘The shear strength of unsaturated soils’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal,
vol. 15, pp. 313–321.
Fredlund, DG & Rahardjo, H 1985, ‘Theoretical context for understanding unsaturated residual soils behavior’, Proceedings of the First International Conference On Geomechanics In Tropical Lateritic and Saprolitic Soils, Brazilian Society for Soil Mechanics, Brasilia, pp. 295–306.
Gan, JKM & Fredlund, DG 1988, ‘Determination of shear strength parameters of an unsaturated soil using the direct shear box’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 25, pp. 500–510.
Head, KH 1986, Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing. Vol. 3: Effective Stress Tests, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Jeeravipoolvarn, S 2010, Geotechnical Behavior of In-line Thickened Tailings, PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Juca, JFT & Escario, V 1989, ‘Strength and deformation of partly saturated soils’, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, CRC-Press, Boca Raton.
Kabwe, LK, Wilson, GW, Beier, NA & Barsi, D 2023, ‘Application of tempe cell to measure soil water characteristic curve along with geotechnical properties of oil sands tailings’, Geosciences, vol. 13, no. 36,
Kaminsky, HAW 2014, ‘Demystifying the methylene blue index’, in D Sergo, GW Wilson & N Beier (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Oil Sands Tailings Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Maccarini, M 1993, ‘A comparison of direct shear box tests with triaxial compression tests for a residual soil’, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 69–80.
Mitchell, JK & Soga, K 2005, Fundamentals of Soil Behaviour, Wiley, New York.
Moon, AT 1984, ‘Effective shear strength parameters for stiff fissured clays’, Geomechanics-interaction: Fourth Australia-New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics, Institution of Engineers Australia, Barton, pp. 107–111.
Omotoso, O & Melanson, A 2014, ‘Influence of clay minerals on the storage and treatment of oil sands tailings’, in R Jewell, AB Fourie, PS Wells & D van Zyl (eds), Paste 2014: Proceedings of the 17th International Seminar on Paste and Thickened Tailings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 269–280.
Saada, AS & Townsend, FC 1981, ‘State of the art: laboratory strength testing of soils’, in RN Yong & FC Towsend (eds), ASTM Special Technical Publication, ASTM International, Conshohocken, pp. 7–77.
Skempton, AW 1964, ‘Long-term stability of clay slopes’, Géotechnique, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 77–102.
Thomson, S & Kjartanson, BH 1985, ‘Study of delayed failure in a cut slope in stiff clay’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 286–297.
Vanapalli, SK, Fredlund, DG, Pufahl, DE & Clifton, AW 1996, ‘Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 379–392.
Wilson, GW, Kabwe, LK, Beier, NA & Scott, JD 2018, ‘Effect of various treatments on consolidation of oil sands fluid fine tailings’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 55, no. 8.




© Copyright 2025, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au