Authors: Ouffa, N; Belem, T; Trauchessec, R; Fortecoëffe, Y

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2555_42

Cite As:
Ouffa, N, Belem, T, Trauchessec, R & Fortecoëffe, Y 2025, 'Effect of replacing Portland cement with limestone, metakaolin and blast furnace slag on the unconfined compressive strength of cemented paste backfill', in AB Fourie, A Copeland, V Daigle & C MacRobert (eds), Paste 2025: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 591-606, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2555_42

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Cemented paste backfill (CPB) is widely used in the mining industry to stabilise underground voids while allowing the re-use of mine tailings. This approach reduces the environmental risks linked to surface storage of tailings. Nevertheless, stabilisation capacity relies on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of CPBs. The UCS, a critical property, is influenced by factors such as the physical and chemical characteristics of the tailings, the solids mass concentration, and the type and proportion of binder used. However, the important carbon footprint and increasing cost of conventional general use (GU) Portland cement, as well as the depletion of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) have prompted the need for more cost-effective and environmentally friendly materials. This paper investigates the incorporation of alternative materials, such as limestone (LS) and metakaolin (MK), into binder formulations. The study utilises a mixture design approach to identify the optimal proportions of these alternative materials to enhance the UCS of the CPB at 28 and 56 days. The methodology includes five reference mixes and 10 mixes of two binary binders (GU-MK and GU-LS), 13 mixes of ternary binder (GU-LS-MK) and 33 mixes of quaternary binder (GU-LS-MK-GGBFS) Unconfined compression tests were performed on these different mixtures after curing times of 7, 28 and 56 days under underground mining conditions. The 61 UCS results at 7, 28 and 56 days of curing demonstrate that formulations incorporating LS, MK (calcined clay) and GGBFS exhibit promising UCS performance. Although further improvements are required to compete with the GGBFS/GU blend, these formulations are anticipated to hold significant potential for reducing both costs and the carbon footprint associated with CPB in mining operations relying solely on GU.

Keywords: mine tailing, cemented paste backfill, alternative binder, carbon footprint reduction, ground granulated blast furnace slag

References:
Antoni, M, Rossen, J, Martirena, F & Scrivener, K 2012, ‘Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone’, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 42, no. 12, 1579–1589.
Belem, T & Benzaazoua, M 2008, ‘Design and application of underground mine paste backfill technology’, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 26, pp. 147–174.
Belem, T Benzaazoua, M & Bussière, B 2000, ‘Mechanical behaviour of cemented paste backfill’, Proceedings of 53rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Montreal,
Benzaazoua, M, Marion, P, Picquet, I & Bussière, B 2004, ‘The use of pastefill as a solidification and stabilization process for the control of acid mine drainage’, Minerals Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 233–243.
Bowker, LN, & Chambers, DM 2015, ‘The risk, public liability, & economics of tailings storage facility failures’, Earthwork Act, vol. 24, pp. 1–56.
Chen, C, Habert, G, Bouzidi, Y & Jullien, A 2010, ‘Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 478–485.
Cornell, JA 2002, Experiments with mixtures: designs, models, and the analysis of mixture data, John Wiley & Sons
Dhers, S, Guggenberger, R, Freimut, D, Fataei, S, Schwesig, P, & Martic, Z 2023, ‘Impact of admixtures on environmental footprint, rheological and mechanical properties of LC3 cemented paste backfill systems’, Minerals, vol. 13, no. 12.
EcoTec Consultants 2022, Retombées Economiques de L’industrie Minière au Québec en 2020, A.m.d. Québec,
Elkhoumsi, I, Belem, T & Benzaazoua, M 2024, ‘Effect of phyllosilicates presence on binder hydration characteristics and hardening process in cemented paste backfills’, Minefill 2024: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount.
Eshun, S, Gidigasu, SSR & Gawu, S 2018, ‘The effect of clay pozzolana-cement-composite on the strength development of a hydraulic backfill’, Ghana Mining Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32–38.
Hu, J, Ding, X, Ren, Q, Luo, Z & Jiang, Q 2019, ‘Effect of incorporating waste limestone powder into solid waste cemented paste backfill material’, Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 10,
Khatib, J, Baalbaki, O & Elkordi, A 2018, ‘Metakaolin’, Waste and Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Concrete, Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, pp. 493–511.
Landriault, D 1995, ‘Paste backfill mix design for Canadian underground hard rock mining’, in FP Hassani, & P Mottahed (eds), Proceedings of the 97th Annual General Meeting of the CIM Rock Mechanics and Strata Control Session, Canadian Institute Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount.
MDDEP 2012, Directive 019 sur L’industrie Minière, Ministère du Développement Durable, Environement et Parcs, Gouvernement du Québec.
Oriol, M & Pera, J 1995, ‘Pozzolanic activity of metakaolin under microwave treatment’, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 265–270.
Ouffa, N, 2024, Contribution au Développement de Nouveaux Ciments Economiques à Empreinte Carbone Réduite Destinés aux Remblais Miniers Cimentés, PhD thesis, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Quebec, and Université de Lorraine, Lorraine.
Ouffa, N, Benzaazoua, M, Belem, T, Trauchessec, R, & Lecomte, A 2023, ‘An alternative to NaOH in the alkali-activation of ground granulated blast furnace slag in the formulation of cemented paste backfills’, in GW Wilson, NA Beier, DC Sego, AB Fourie & D Reid (eds), Paste 2023: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, University of Alberta, Edmonton, and Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 112–126,
10.36487/ACG_repo/2355_08
Ouffa, N, Trauchessec, R, Belem, T, Lecomte, A & Benzaazoua, M 2024, ‘Exploring the potential of LC3 cement incorporating calcined clay from Abitibi region (Canada) for cemented paste backfill applications: a preliminary study’, Minefill 2024: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Mining with Backfill, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount.
Sahi, A, 2016, Validation Expérimentale d'un Modèle de Sélection Optimale des Liants dans la Fabrication des Remblais Miniers Cimentés, Master’s thesis, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal.
Scrivener, K, Martirena, F, Bishnoi, S & Maity, S 2018, ‘Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3)’, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 114, pp. 49–56.
Tennis, P, Thomas, M & Weiss, W 2011, State-of-the-Art Report on Use of Limestone in Cements at Levels of up to 15%, Portland Cement Association, Skokie.
Vejmelková, E, Pavlíková, M, Keppert, M, Keršner, Z, Rovnaníková, P, Ondráček, M, Sedlmajer, M & Černý, R 2010, ‘High performance concrete with Czech metakaolin: Experimental analysis of strength, toughness and durability characteristics’ Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1404–1411.
Wang, D, Shi, C, Farzadnia, N, Shi, Z, Jia, H & Ou, Z 2018, ‘A review on use of limestone powder in cement-based materials: Mechanism, hydration and microstructures’, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 181, pp. 659–672.
Wild, S, Khatib, JM & Jones, A 1996, ‘Relative strength, pozzolanic activity and cement hydration in superplasticised metakaolin concrete’, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 26, no.10, pp. 1537–1544.
Zheng, J, Zhu, Y & Zhao, Z 2016, ‘Utilization of limestone powder and water-reducing admixture in cemented paste backfill of coarse copper mine tailings’ Construction and Building Materials, vol. 124, pp. 31–36.




© Copyright 2025, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au