DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2615_06
Cite As:
Mpanza, M & Rupprecht, S 2026, 'Host mining community expectations on stakeholder engagement
in the West Wits Basin, South Africa', in AB Fourie, G Boggs, J Heyes & M Tibbett (eds),
Mine Closure 2026: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-17,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2615_06
Abstract:
Stakeholder engagement is a critical issue in South Africa's mining sector, driven by increasing calls for transparency, accountability, and meaningful participation by host mining communities. Despite legislative frameworks such as the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRD Act), the Mining Charter, and Social and Labour Plans (SLPs), host mining communities continue to express concerns regarding the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement and their involvement in decisions that affect their communities. This study evaluated the methods of stakeholder engagement employed by surrounding mining companies as perceived by the Slovoville host mining community in the West Wits Basin. It assessed the methods used by mining companies to engage the community and examined the community’s understanding, experiences, and expectations regarding the stakeholder engagement process. A mixed-methods approach that included a structured questionnaire administered to 50 community members and semi-structured qualitative interviews was utilised. The findings revealed that stakeholder engagement is often undertaken through passive communication platforms such as newspapers, company websites and social media. Many respondents considered these approaches ineffective for promoting meaningful understanding and participation. Respondents reported difficulties accessing and understanding information and had limited awareness of stakeholder engagement legislation. They preferred a face-to-face dialogue kind of engagement that allows interaction and clarification. Most felt that surrounding mining companies do not adequately understand or respond to community needs. The host mining community of Slovoville expects mining companies to not only inform them but engage them on community development projects, environmental responsibility, economic development and employment. The study concludes that improving stakeholder engagement requires communication that is more accessible, participatory, transparent and responsive to host mining community needs.
References:
Action Aid International 2019, 2019 Global Annual Report, Johannesburg.
Benchmarks Foundation 2018, Benchmarks Foundation Annual Report,
Centre for Environmental Rights and Lawyers for Human Rights 2014, Mining and Your Community: Know Your Environmental Rights, Centre for Environmental Rights and Lawyers for Human Rights, Cape Town,
Creamer Media, Engineering News, 2018, ‘Perceptions mines are not doing enough for nearby communities fuelling protests’, Creamer Media, Engineering News, Johannesburg,
Dikgwatlhe, I & Mulenga, F 2023, ‘Perceptions of local communities regarding the impacts of mining on employment and economic activities in South Africa’, Resources Policy, vol. 80.
Edwards, J & Maritz, A 2014, ‘Social aspects of mine closure: the elephant in the room’, in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 305–316.
European Union 2024, Digital skills in 2023: impact of education and age, Luxembourg.
Farrell, LA, Hamann, R & Mackres, E 2012, ‘A clash of cultures (and lawyers): Anglo Platinum and mine affected communities in Limpopo Province, South Africa’, Resources Policy, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 194–204,
Greenwood, M 2007, ‘Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 74,
no. 4, pp. 315–327.
Hofmeyr, J 2025, ‘How do mining companies induce community participation? Processes, rationales and contestation in South Africa’s platinum-rich Limpopo Province’, Extractive Industries and Society , vol. 23,
International Association for Public Participation 2018, Spectrum of public participation, viewed 10 July 2026,
Matebesi, SZ & Twala, C 2024, ‘Evolution of mining company responses to civil society mobilization in South Africa’, Enterprise & Society, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 358–375,
Minerals Council South Africa 2025, Mining employment rises amid broader labour market strain, Minerals Council South
Minerals Council South Africa 2026, Social and Labour Plans, Minerals Council South Africa, Johannesburg,
Mnwana, S 2015, ‘Democracy development and chieftaincy along South Africa’s platinum highway some emerging issues’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 510–529.
Mostert, H, 2014, ‘Land as a "national asset" under the Constitution: the system change envisaged by the 2011 Green Paper on Land Policy and what this means for property law under the Constitution’, Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 760–796,
pelj.v17i2.06
Mostert, H & Mathiba, G 2023, N Graham, M Davies & L Godden (eds), ‘Mine community displacement and resettlement in South Africa’, The Routledge Handbook of Property, Law and Society, Routledge, Oxon, pp. 61–74.
Mtero, F 2017, ‘Rural livelihoods, large-scale mining and agrarian change in Mapela, Limpopo, South Africa’, Resources Policy, vol. 53, pp. 190–200,
Nyembo, N & Lees, Z 2020, ‘Barriers to implementing a social license to operate in mining communities: A case study of peri-urban South Africa’, Extractive Industries and Society, pp. 153–160,
Pickering, J & Nyapisi, T 2017, ‘A community left in the dark: the case of Mapela’, In Good Company: Conversations Around Transparency and Accountability in South Africa’s Extractive Sector, 2nd edn, Open Foundation for South Africa, Cape Town, pp. 27–35.
Prno, J & Slocombe, DS 2012, ‘Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: perspectives from governance and sustainability theories’, Resources Policy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 346–357,
Sangqu, AH 2024, Power asymmetric relationships between mining firms and community stakeholders: What works and what does not? The case of the South African mining industry, PhD thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
Turnhout, E, Metze, T, Wyborn, C, Klenk, N & Louder, E 2020, ‘The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 42, pp. 15–21,