DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2615_155
Cite As:
Dunlop, J, Zappala, L, Purtill, J & Kerr, B 2026, 'The opportunity to access carbon and nature repair markets on rehabilitated mined land', in AB Fourie, G Boggs, J Heyes & M Tibbett (eds),
Mine Closure 2026: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-8,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2615_155
Abstract:
A key objective of the work conducted by the Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner is to encourage the beneficial use of as much mined land post-mining as possible. Where a miner’s legal obligation to rehabilitate mined land to the nominated post-mining land use and any other conditions have been met, there is an opportunity for rehabilitated mined land to be utilised to access emerging carbon and nature repair markets.
Market-based approaches have emerged internationally as effective policy tools to help address climate change and biodiversity loss. The carbon and nature repair markets that have been implemented in Queensland include the Commonwealth Government’s Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) scheme, the Queensland Government’s Land Restoration Fund (LRF) (by adding value to ACCUs through co-benefits) and the Nature Repair Market (NRM). The potential for accessing carbon and nature repair markets on mined land is yet to be tested. This paper focuses on assessing the potential for accessing carbon markets on mined land. ACCU projects must be registered with the Clean Energy Regulator and meet eligibility criteria. To gain an insight into the potential scale of benefits linked to carbon market projects on rehabilitated mined land, a preliminary assessment was conducted across 4 mine sites in Queensland using the Full Carbon Accounting Model (FullCAM). This assessment considered the potential for reforestation by environmental plantings and indicated emission reductions (as carbon dioxide equivalent [CO2-e] sequestered) in the range of 25 – 96 t/ha across a 25-year period. A range of other methods to generate ACCUs are also available that may have potential for application to rehabilitated mined land such as storing carbon in soil, recycling animal waste or switching farm animal diets and fertilisers. ACCU projects may be stacked with NRM projects to leverage increased value. Mining operations may also host additional programs such as fugitive emissions capture and use projects to earn ACCUs.
The opportunity to earn ACCUs on land after mining can both help to offset carbon emissions and encourage the transition of land from active mining to a productive and sustainable use into the long term while providing an additional income stream for landholders. This paper presents a pathway for accessing these markets post-mining and discusses both the requirements and the opportunities that accessing these markets present.
Keywords: carbon markets, carbon offsets, nature repair markets, post mining land use
References:
Alchin, M, Braimbridge, M, Jasper, D, Hay, B & Lacy, H 2011, 'Commercialisation of rangeland carbon offsets by resource
companies', in Y Potvin (ed.), Strategic versus Tactical 2011: Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on Strategic versus Tactical Approaches in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 20–210,
Clean Energy Regulator 2025a, Australian carbon credit units, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 23 April,
Clean Energy Regulator 2025b, Reforestation by environmental or mallee plantings FullCAM method 2024, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 7 November 2025,
Clean Energy Regulator 2026a, ACCU Scheme methods, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 25 April 2026,
Clean Energy Regulator 2026b, 2024–25 Baselines and emissions table, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 15 April 2026,
Clean Energy Regulator 2026c, Australian environmental markets, viewed 23 April 2026,
Clean Energy Regulator 2026d, Estimating soil organic carbon sequestration using measurement and models method, ACCU Scheme types, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 23 April 2026,
Clean Energy Regulator 2026e, Kestrel Mine - Coal Mine Waste Gas Powerstation, Project Snapshot, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 25 April 2026,
CORE Markets 2025, The many facets of ACCU price dynamics – a guide for anyone with a carbon exposure, Canberra, viewed 25 April 2026,
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water 2024, Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) (Reforestation by Environmental or Mallee Plantings—FullCAM) Methodology Determination, Australian Government, Canberra.
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water 2025, FullCAM Guidelines, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 25 April 2026,
Dhond, A, Ermgassen, S, Swinfield, T, Robertson, M, Heinemeyer, A, Owen, S & Bull, JW 2024, ‘Permanence Risks to Biodiversity and Nature‐Based Carbon Offsets’, Conservation Letters, Brisbane, vol. 19, no. 2,
Dunlop, J, Purtill, J, Kuchanur, M & Wendtland, K 2024, ‘Comparing coal mine rehabilitation practices in Queensland, Australia with Wyoming, United States of America’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett & G Boggs (eds), Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 389–400,
Dye, AW, Houtman, RM, Gao, P, Anderegg, WRL, Fettig, CJ, Hicke, JA, ... Riley, KL 2024, ‘Carbon, climate, and natural disturbance: a review of mechanisms, challenges, and tools for understanding forest carbon stability in an uncertain future’, Carbon Balance and Management, vol. 19, http:\\
Greenhill S, Hsiang S, Balboni C, Barrage L, Bolliger IW, Boomhower J, Diaz D, Druckenmiller H, Garg T, Hino M, Hong H, Kousky C, Martinich J, Nath I, Oremus KL, Park RJ, Phan T, Proctor J, Rafey W, Sarofim MC, Schlenker W and Simon B 2026, ‘Using markets to adapt to climate change’, Science, vol. 391, no. 6786, pp. 662–664,
Mishra P 2026, ‘Carbon market mechanisms and biodiversity co-benefits for sustainable development: a bibliometric analysis of global research trends and policy integration’, Environmental Systems Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp 2,
Queensland Government 1994, Environmental Protection Ac 1994, Brisbane.
Queensland Government 2023, The Land Restoration Fund Co-benefits Standard, Version 1.4, Brisbane.
Queensland Government 2025, Co-benefits Tool methodology, Brisbane,
search.do?mode=BASIC&openDetail=true&corporation=DERM&action=search&anonymous=true&queryTerm=uuid%3D%221c0099ba0a5a00fa105dc4a0000cb831%22&editionUuid=1c0099ba0a5a00fa105dc4a0000cb831&operator=OR
Tibbett, M 2008, ‘Carbon accumulation in soils during reforestation — the Australian experience after bauxite mining’, in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, I Weiersbye & P Dye (eds), Mine Closure 2008: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 3–11,
United Nations 2015, Paris Agreement, viewed 24 April 2026,
english_paris_agreement.pdf
United Nations 2026, Sustainable Development Goals, viewed 25 April 2026,
The World Bank, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022, Washington DC.
You W, Ryu D, Webb RI & Zhou Q 2025 ‘Harnessing market mechanisms for greenhouse gas reduction: a comprehensive review’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 115,