DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2615_91
Cite As:
Jain, K, Nelis, T-J, Burgess, R, Navarro Valdivia, L, Miller, C, Chen, E, Hoodhills, S & Weber, P 2026, 'Integrating water and load balance modelling for mine closure', in AB Fourie, G Boggs, J Heyes & M Tibbett (eds),
Mine Closure 2026: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-9,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2615_91
Abstract:
Mine closure planning requires a robust understanding of geoenvironmental source hazards, solute generation processes, water movement, management controls and closure objectives. Water and load balance models (WLBMs) provide a practical approach for integrating these elements and supporting risk-based closure decisions. This paper presents a framework for developing closure-focused WLBMs, supported by practical examples that demonstrate how conceptual site models, water balance components, domain-based source terms, engineering controls and scenario analysis can be integrated to assess closure risks. The paper highlights that WLBMs are most valuable when used as decision-support tools rather than static compliance models. Key limitations include uncertainty in source terms, climate inputs, net percolation, treatment performance and the availability of site-specific monitoring data. These limitations can be addressed through scenario analysis and adaptive management, whereby model predictions are progressively updated as new monitoring data become available.
Keywords: modelling, acid and metalliferous drainage, geochemistry, hydrogeochemistry, closure, mining, prediction
References:
Allen, RG, Pereira, LS, Raes, D & Smith, M 1998, Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Commonwealth of Australia 2016a, Mine Closure: Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Canberra.
Commonwealth of Australia 2016b, Evaluating Performance: Monitoring and Auditing: Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Canberra.
Dold, B 2014, ‘Evolution of acid mine drainage formation in sulfidic mine tailings’, Minerals, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 621–641,
ICMM 2025, Integrated Mine Closure: Good Practice Guide, 3rd edn, viewed 3 July 2026,
ICMM & INAP 2025, Tool for Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching Prevention and Management, viewed 3 July 2026,
INAP 2012, Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide, viewed 3 July 2026,
Kemanga, B, McIntyre, N & Bulovic, N 2024, ‘Hydrological classification of mine pit lakes using modelling experiments’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 370, article 123057,
Maest, AS, Kuipers, JR, Travers, CL & Atkins, DA 2005, Predicting Water Quality at Hardrock Mines: Methods and Models, Uncertainties, and State-Of-The-Art, Kuipers & Associates and Buka Environmental.
Nordstrom, DK 2011, ‘Mine waters: acidic to circumneutral’, Elements, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 393–398,
gselements.7.6.393
Zhang, A, Wilson, D, Ptacek, CJ & Blowes, DW 2024, ‘Reactive transport modelling of tailings hydrogeochemistry under a composite cover’, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, vol. 261, article 104290,