DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_03
Cite As:
Velásquez , J, Vallejos, J & Sepúlveda, R 2026, 'Dynamic performance of ground support systems under impact loading
tests: a deformation-based interpretation', in D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Ground Support 2026: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-14,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_03
Abstract:
This work presents an analysis of the dynamic response of ground support systems subjected to large-scale impact loading tests. The methodology integrates the estimation of the global dynamic demand from acceleration records, together with the evaluation of the local response of the reinforcement elements and the system displacement. The results show that support performance depends not only on the input energy, but also on the sequence of component activation and failure, load redistribution, and the degree of integration between mesh, shotcrete and anchorage elements. Three groups of field-scale tests are compared: stiff-impact tests on load-distribution systems (mesh-over-shotcrete configurations), stiff-impact tests on the central reinforcement element with high-tensile embedded mesh, and soft-impact tests incorporating an energy transfer bed. Across the families’ groups, the mesh type and its installation (embedded versus over shotcrete), the bolt installation condition (grouted versus in a steel tube) and the presence of a load transfer bed are shown to govern the failure mode, the displacement at which the central element is eliminated and the post-failure energy absorption. This approach enables the comparison of different ground support systems in terms of their ability to control deformation, dissipate energy and maintain load transfer toward stable zones, while also providing a basis for the selection of design parameters under dynamic demand conditions.
Keywords: dynamic testing, ground support systems, energy dissipation, load–displacement response, rockburst
References:
Brändle, R, Rorem, E, Luis, R & Fischer, G 2017, ‘Full-scale dynamic tests of a ground support system using high-tensile strength chainlink mesh in El Teniente mine, Chile’, in M Hudyma & Y Potvin (eds), UMT 2017: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Underground Mining Technology, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 25–43,
Cai, M & Kaiser, PK 2018, Rockburst Support Reference Book, Volume I: Rockburst Phenomenon and Support Characteristics, MIRARCO – Mining Innovation Rehabilitation and Applied Research Corporation, Laurentian University, Sudbury.
Cuello, D, Orrego, C, Vallejos, J & Velásquez, J 2024, ‘The role of surface support in controlling rockbursting conditions’, in D Johansson & H Schunnesson (eds), MassMin 2024: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp. 948-964,
Kaiser, PK & Moss, A 2022, ‘Deformation-based support design for highly stressed ground with a focus on rockburst damage mitigation’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 50–66.
Li, CC 2014, ‘Principles of rockbolting design’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 105–116.
Player, JR, Morton, EC, Thompson, AG & Villaescusa, E 2008, ‘Static and dynamic testing of steel wire mesh for mining applications of rock surface support’, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Civil Engineering Construction, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Cape Town, pp. 693–706.
Potvin, Y & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2015, 'Empirical ground support design of mine drives', in Y Potvin (ed.), Design Methods 2015: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Design Methods in Underground Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 419-430,
Vallejos, JA, Bucher, R & Álvarez, R 2022, ‘Analysis of the behavior of the weld mesh and the rolled mesh against static loads and a dynamic impact, to design the overlap according with the connection method’, Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines (RaSiM10), Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Englewood.
Vallejos, JA, Marambio, E, Burgos, L, Cuello, D, Brändle, R, Luis, R, von Rickenbach, G & Fischer, G 2024, ‘Dynamic test response of ground support systems for underground excavations at the Walenstadt testing facility’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 57, pp. 389–428,
Villaescusa, E, Thompson, AG & Player, JR 2016, ‘Dynamic testing of combined rock bolt and mesh schemes’, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference and Exhibition on Mass Mining (MassMin 2016), The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.