Authors: Sweet, D; Emery, T; Wilson, S; Humphreys, M


DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_17

Cite As:
Sweet, D, Emery, T, Wilson, S & Humphreys, M 2026, 'Comparing steel mesh performance in an overlap condition', in D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds), Ground Support 2026: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-12, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_17

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
In pursuit of reducing incidents and injuries due to ground falls, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has expanded their novel high-energy, high-displacement (HEHD) test machine to test mesh ground support in an overlap condition. The overlap zone in overhead ground support is not widely tested but is seen as an area particularly vulnerable to damage as mesh is more likely to separate at this location rather than maintain its ability to take load. In this study, traditional steel mesh materials were tested in a quasi-static overlap condition with approximately 300 mm (12 in) of overlap. These materials were 9gauge or 3.8 mm diameter chain link with a 50.8 mm (2 in) aperture, 6-gauge or 4.9 mm diameter welded wire mesh with 76 mm (3 in) aperture, and 6-gauge welded wire mesh with a 102 mm (4 in) aperture. Test results primarily showed a stiffening effect at the overlap, and the chain link displacement at the peak load decreased 34%, while both welded wire materials decreased by 41 to 52%. These results will improve industry understanding of mesh performance at the overlap zone by establishing what the relative peak load, material strain, and absorbed energy are. Understanding these relative properties will enable mine operators to further compare steel mesh materials.

Keywords: ground support, mesh, liner, welded wire, chain link, overlap, mechanical performance, ground support

References:
Benton, D, Iverson, S, Martin, L, Johnson, J & Raffaldi, M 2016, ‘Volumetric measurement of rock movement using photogrammetry’, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 123–130.
Benton, DJ, Sweet, DJ & Emery, TM 2022, ‘Comparative analysis of synthetic and steel mesh performance’, in Proceedings of the 56th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association, Westminster.
Brändle, R & Bucher, R 2023, ‘Large-scale tests of weld mesh versus high-tensile chain link mesh on mesh overlap load transfer’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Ground Support 2023: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 399–410,
Cai, M 2013, ‘Principles of rock support in burst-prone ground’, Journal of Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 36, pp. 46–56.
Kirsten, HAD & Labrum, PR 1990, ‘The equivalence of fibre and mesh reinforcement in the shotcrete used in tunnel-support systems’, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 90, pp. 153–171.
Morkel, IG, Mikula, PA & Whiting, RK 2023, ‘A review of ground support mesh testing around the world’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Ground Support 2023: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 373–398,
NIOSH 2024, NIOSH, Mining and Ground Falls, viewed 9 October 2024,
Ortlepp, WD 1983, ‘Considerations in the design of support for deep hard-rock tunnels’, Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Australian Geomechanics Society, Melbourne, pp. D179–187.
Potvin, Y, Wesseloo, J & Heal, D 2010, ‘An interpretation of ground support capacity submitted to dynamic loading’, in M Van Sint Jan & Y Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2010: Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 251–272,
Zhang, P & Eriksson, F 2023, ‘Assessment of static performance of welded mesh along mesh overlap used at Kiirunavaara mine’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1124, no. 012093.




© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au