DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_31
Cite As:
Hadjigeorgiou, J & Knox, G 2026, 'Energy-absorbing rockbolt behaviour under combination loading angle configurations', in D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Ground Support 2026: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-12,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_31
Abstract:
Energy-absorbing rockbolts are applied in ground conditions where large deformations are anticipated. In such conditions, it is expected that the rockbolt may be subjected to multiple loading configurations ranging from axial through to shear. The relationship between the loading angle and energy capacity of a rockbolt represents a knowledge gap that may account for the difference in performance observed in the field and recorded in the laboratory testing.
This paper investigates the mechanical behaviour of energy-absorbing rockbolts under quasi-static loading for a range of loading angles. A combination shear and tensile pull test rig was employed to simulate axial (0°) combination shear and loading with resultant loading angles (30 and 60°) and shear loading (90°) All selected rockbolts employed the ‘steel stretching’ mechanism whereby energy is dissipated through the plastic deformation of the bar between two anchor points bounding the loaded section. This includes paddled energy-absorbing, yielding mechanical hybrid and energy-absorbing self-drilling rockbolt types.
The results identified variations in performance as a function of loading angle for all rockbolt types. In addition, the presence or absence of a chemical anchoring medium was identified as a critical factor in the response of the rockbolts to combination loading. The results provide the means for a data driven design approach recognising difference in behaviour of energy-absorption rockbolts under complex loading quasistatic loading conditions.
Keywords: energy-absorbing rockbolts, quasi-static loading, combined loading configurations, steel stretching mechanism
References:
Chen, Y & Li, CC 2015, ‘Performance of fully encapsulated rebar bolts and D-Bolts under combined pull-and-shear loading’, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 45, pp. 99–106.
Hadjigeorgiou, J & Knox, G 2025, ‘Interpreting energy-absorption values for rockbolts from quasi static and impact tests’, ISRM International Symposium Eurock 2025 – Expanding the Underground Space, Trondheim.
Knox, G & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2022, ‘Influence of testing configuration on the performance of paddled energy-absorbing rockbolts under impact loading’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 55, pp. 5705–5721.
Knox, G & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2023a, ‘Performance in shear of mechanical hybrid rockbolts’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Ground Support 2023: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 495–506,
Knox, G & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2023b, ‘Performance of conventional and energyabsorbing selfdrilling hollow core rockbolts under controlled laboratory conditions’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 56, pp. 4363–4378.
Knox, G & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2024a, ‘Behaviour of paddled energy-absorbing rockbolts under complex loading laboratory conditions.’ Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 124, no. 9. pp. 535–546.
Knox, G & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2024b, ‘Behaviour of yielding mechanical hybrid rockbolts under complex loading conditions’ International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 182.
Knox, G & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2025, ‘Rockbolts in shear’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 125, no. 11. pp. 621–628.
Li, C 2010, ‘A new energy-absorbing bolt for rock support in high stress rock masses’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, vol. 47, pp. 396–404.
Li, CC, Hadjigeorgiou, J, Mikula, P, Knox, G, Darlington, B, Royer, R & Hosp M, 2021, ‘Performance of Identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 745–754.