DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_45
Cite As:
Verma, RK & Hossack, A 2026, 'Dynamic ground support design for burst-prone mines:
a systematic framework integrating the burst envelope', in D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Ground Support 2026: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-15,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_45
Abstract:
Rockbursts are sudden, violent failures of rock around underground excavations and may result from strainbursts, pillar bursts or fault slip bursts. Despite extensive research, the need for a unified and reliable methodology for designing ground support systems under dynamic load, persists. This paper reviews existing dynamic ground support design methods and introduces an energy-based ‘burst envelope’ framework for preliminary assessment of rockburst potential. Defined in 3D principal stress space, the burst envelope links rock material properties, specimen size effects, and in situ stress conditions to evaluate the likelihood and severity of strainbursts. By considering different stress paths under true-triaxial loading–unloading conditions, the approach provides mechanistic insight into strainburst initiation, addressing limitations of conventional empirical indices.
The study further evaluates key methodologies, including the methods outlined in the Canadian Rockburst Handbook, the rockburst damage potential (RDP) and Western Australia School of Mines (WASM) approaches, as well as numerical modelling techniques for underground rockburst assessment and ground support design in dynamic loading conditions. Limitations are highlighted, particularly in estimating dynamic demand parameters such as peak particle velocity (PPV), which are affected by wave propagation and geological heterogeneity. Key ground support functionality requirements are discussed, emphasising the need for integrated system behaviour under dynamic conditions. A hybrid design framework is proposed, combining burst envelope-based assessment, empirical and analytical methods, and calibrated numerical modelling, continuously updated through field monitoring and back-analysis. This integrated approach provides a pathway toward a more consistent and mechanism-informed design methodology for dynamic ground support design in underground mining.
Keywords: rockburst, strainburst, dynamic ground support, burst envelope
References:
Askaripour, M, Saeidi, A, Rouleau, A & Mercier-Langevin, P 2022, ‘Rockburst in underground excavations: a review of mechanisms, classification and prediction methods’, Underground Space, pp. 577–607.
Brändle, R & Roth, A 2024, ‘Dynamic assessment of ground support schemes: insights from comprehensive full-scale testing’, in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 195–206,
Cai, M & Kaiser, PK 2018, Rockburst Support Reference Book, Volume 1: Rockburst Phenomenon and Support Characteristics, MIRARCO, Sudbury.
Dunn, M 2017, ‘Dynamic ground support — design methodologies and uncertainties’, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 637–650,
Epiroc 2022a, PAR1 Resin Bolt Brochure, brochure, Epiroc, Boksburg.
Epiroc 2022b, PAR1 Pumpable Bolt Product Data, product data, Epiroc, Boksburg.
Graham, J, Waheed, U & Mikula, PA 2023, ‘Empirical charting for dynamic ground support at Flying Fox and Spotted Quoll mines’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Ground Support 2023: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 115–128,
Heal, DP 2010, Observations and Analysis of Incidences of Rockburst Damage in Underground Mines, PhD thesis, The University Of Western Australia, Perth
Kaiser, PK & Cai, M 2013, ‘Critical review of design principles for rock support in burst-prone ground – time to rethink!’, in Y Potvin & B Brady (eds), Ground Support 2013: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 3–37,
Kaiser, PK & Cai, M 2012, ‘Design of rock support system under rockburst condition’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 215–227,
Kaiser, PK, McCreath, DR, Tannant, DD, Brummer, RK, Maloney, S, Vasak, P & Xiaoping, Y 1996, Canadian Rockburst Support Handbook, Geomechanics Research Centre, MIRARCO, Sudbury.
Kaiser, PK & Moss, A 2022, ‘Deformation-based support design for highly stressed ground with a focus on rockburst damage mitigation’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 50–66,
Knox, G & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2024, ‘Direct impact load tests on mechanical hybrid rockbolts’, in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 467–478,
Li, CC & Charette, F 2010, ‘Dynamic performance of the D-Bolt’, in M Van Sint Jan & Y Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2010: Proceedings of the Fifth International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 321–328,
Li, CC, Stjern, G & Myrvang, A 2014, ‘A review on the performance of conventional and energy-absorbing rockbolts’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 315–327,
Lorig, LJ & Varona, P 2013, ‘Guidelines for numerical modelling of rock support for mines’, in Y Potvin & B Brady (eds), Ground Support 2013: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 81-105,
Morissette, P & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2019, ‘Ground support design for dynamic loading conditions: a quantitative data-driven approach based on rockburst case studies’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 909–919,
Morkel, IG, Mikula, PA & Whiting, RK 2023, ‘A review of ground support mesh testing around the world’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Ground Support 2023: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 373–398,
Moss, A & Kaiser, PK 2022, ‘An operational approach to ground control in deep mines’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 67–81,
Player, JR, Villaescusa, E & Thompson, AG 2009, ‘Dynamic testing of friction rock stabilisers’, Proceedings of the 3rd Canada–US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 20th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Player, JR, Villaescusa, E & Thompson, AG 2013, ‘Dynamic testing of fully encapsulated threaded bar – resin and cement grouted’, in Y Potvin & B Brady (eds), Ground Support 2013: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 247–264,
Potvin, Y & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2020, Ground Support for Underground Mines, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth.
Roach, W, Rataj, M & Darlington, B 2019, ‘Development of a new Sandvik “little brother” dynamic rockbolt and the in situ dynamic evaluation of bolts’, in J Hadjigeorgiou & M Hudyma (eds), Ground Support 2019: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 201–212,
Sandvik 2024, Posimix Dynamic Resin Bolt, product specification, Sandvik Mining and Rock Solutions.
Sandvik n.d., MD/MDX Bolt, product brochure, Sandvik Mining and Rock Solutions.
Split Set Mining Systems 2024, Split Set Friction Rock Stabilisers: Specifications and Performance, International Rollforms, Inc.
Verma, RK 2020, A Combined Theoretical-Experimental-Numerical Approach to Characterization and Modelling of Rock Fracture and Rock Burst, PhD thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.
Verma, RK, Nguyen, GD, Karakus, M & Taheri, A 2024, ‘A size-dependent energy-based strain burst criterion’, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, vol. 48, pp. 3186–3209,
Verma, RK, Nguyen, GD, Karakus, M, Taheri, A & Bui, HH 2018, ‘Numerical analysis of fracture propagation in Brazilian disc test’, in Proceedings of the Third Australasian Conference on Computational Mechanics (ACCM 2018), Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Verma, RK, Pour, AF, Dawidowski, P, Nguyen, GD, Bui, HH & Karakus, M 2019, ‘Analysing localisation behaviour of Hawkesbury sandstone using digital image correlation technique’, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, Curran Associates, Red Hook.
Verma, RK & Chandra, S 2020, ‘Polyaxial strength criterion and closed-form solution for squeezing rock conditions’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 507–515.
Verma, RK, Nguyen, GD, Karakus, M & Taheri, A 2021, ‘AUSBIT: a novel approach to capturing snapback in indirect tensile testing’, paper ARMA-2021-1347, Proceedings of the 55th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association, Eaton.
Villaescusa, E, Kusui, A & Drover, C 2016, ‘Ground support design for sudden and violent failures in hard rock tunnels’, Proceedings of the 9th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Indonesian Rock Mechanics Society, Bandung.
Wang, J, Apel, DB, Pu, Y, Hall, R, Wei, C & Sepehri, M 2021, ‘Numerical modeling for rockbursts: a state-of-the-art review’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 457–478,
.
Wesseloo, J 2018, ‘The spatial assessment of the current seismic hazard state for hard rock underground mines’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1839–1862,
.