Case studies of strainburst demand assessment

doi:10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_46

Authors: Rigby, A; Moridi, M; Hafeez, F; Malovichko, D; Kaiser, PK

Download Paper

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_46

Cite As:
Rigby, A, Moridi, M, Hafeez, F, Malovichko, D & Kaiser, PK 2026, 'Case studies of strainburst demand assessment', in D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds), Ground Support 2026: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ground Support in Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-14, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2625_46

Download citation as: ris bibtex endnote text Zotero

Abstract:
During a tunnel strainburst, there is a rapid stress fracturing and bulking of rock, which imposes a simultaneous displacement and energy demand on the support system. The strainburst also constitutes a seismic source/event, the low-frequency radiation of which will be dominated by convergence of the surrounding rock mass into the tunnel, leading to a crush-type mechanism. Unlike cases of shakedown, it is not appropriate to estimate strainburst demand based on the intensity of ground motion (e.g. peak ground velocity/peak particle velocity) calculated from the size (potency, energy, or magnitude) of this event and its distance to tunnels. Instead, the fracturing/bulking process should be assessed more directly, which can be done by using a combination of geomechanical and seismic data. This paper presents such assessments for 2 case studies from a Western Australian hard rock mine. In each case, the estimated strainburst demand is also compared with the remnant capacity of the installed ground support. Performing such assessments on past events helps to better understand the demand that could be posed by future strainbursts, which can be used to guide support selection/design.

Keywords: strainburst demand, remnant support capacity, rockburst hazard

References:

Kaiser, P 2016, ‘Ground support for constructability of deep underground excavations - challenges of managing highly stressed ground in civil and mining projects’, Sir Muir Wood lecture of International Tunnelling Association at World Tunnelling Congress.

Kaiser, PK, McCreath, D & Tannant, D 1996, Canadian Rockburst Support Handbook, Geomechanics Research Center, Sudbury.

Kaiser, P & Moss, A 2022, ‘Deformation-based support design for highly stressed ground with a focus on rockburst damage mitigation’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 14, no.1, pp. 50–66.

Malovichko, D 2020, ‘Description of seismic sources in underground mines: theory’, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 110, pp. 2124–2137.

Malovichko, DA 2022, ‘Utility of seismic source mechanisms in mining’, Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Englewood.

Malovichko, D & Rigby, A 2022, ‘Description of seismic sources in underground mines: dynamic stress fracturing around tunnels and strainbursting’, arXiv,

Perras, MA & Diederichs, MS 2016, ‘Predicting excavation damage zone depths in brittle rocks’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 60–74.

Rigby, A 2024, ‘Physically motivated moment-tensor decomposition for mining-induced seismicity’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 443–455.

Rigby, A, Malovichko, D, Moridi, M & Kaiser, PK 2026a, ‘Estimating bulking factor for rock around tunnels using LiDAR data’, in Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Rock Mechanics, Australian Geomechanics Society, Brisbane, pp. 422–429.

Rigby, A, Malovichko, D & Kaiser, PK 2026b, ‘A Rockburst Hazard Assessment Framework for Strainbursting’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au