DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_104
Cite As:
Rubio Esquivel, E & Fuentes Bustamante, M 2026, 'Managing complexity and risk in large-scale mining developments:
strategies for successful operations', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-19,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_104
Abstract:
Large-scale mining developments, including next-generation ‘super caves’, are inherently complex, capitalintensive, and high-risk. As surface deposits deplete, the industry is transitioning to bulk underground methods – principally block and panel caving – to access deep orebodies. These projects face unique challenges, including decade-long development timelines and significant technical uncertainties. This paper examines strategies to manage such complexity through phased, modular development versus traditional front-loaded megaprojects. We discuss how embracing flexibility can mitigate risk and achieve economic outcomes often overlooked by conventional discounted cash flow (DCF) methods. By comparing caving techniques, exploring ‘super caving’ transitions, and analysing case studies like El Teniente and KamoaKakula, we synthesise best practices for securing long-term value through technical simplicity and adaptive planning.
Keywords: large-scale mining, underground mining, block caving, super caving, risk-based mine planning, phased project development, open pit to underground transition
References:
Casten, T, Johnson, M, Zimmer, C & Mahayasa, M 2020, ‘PT Freeport Indonesia – The transition to underground production’, in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 23–38,
Codelco 2021, El Teniente 2020 Sustainability Report, Santiago.
Flores-Gonzalez, G 2019, ‘Major hazards associated with cave mining: are they manageable?’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), MGR 2019: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 31–46,
Flyvbjerg, B (ed.) 2017, The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Komnenic, A 2013, ‘1,500 Barrick workers out of a job as Pascua Lama suspension takes effect’, Mining.com, viewed 2 July 2026,
Laubscher, DH 1994, ‘Cave mining – the state of the art’, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 279–293.
McKinsey & Company 2019, Optimizing Mining Feasibility Studies: The $100 Billion Opportunity, viewed 2 July 2026,
Moss, A, Jones, C & Board, M 2024, ‘The challenges of transitioning to bulk underground mining’, in D Johansson & H Schunnesson (eds), MassMin 2024: Proceedings of the International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp. 830–844,
Perrow, C 1999, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, updated edn, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Rubio, E 2006, Block Cave Mine Infrastructure Reliability Applied to Production Planning, PhD thesis, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Rubio, E, Troncoso, S & Prasetyo, R 2008, ‘Reliability-centered mine planning model for caving operations’, in H Schunnesson & E Nordlund (eds), MassMin 2008: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and Exhibition on Mass Mining, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp. 213–224.
van As, A & Guest, A 2020, ‘The design & operating philosophies of panel vs block caving’, in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 207–220,