DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_20
Cite As:
Hebert, Y, Lawrence, K & Peik, B 2026, 'A flow-controlled support formulation for coupled cave propagation modelling', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-15,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_20
Abstract:
Coupled continuum–flow simulations are widely used to simulate cave propagation, reflecting the influence of gravity-flow on stress redistribution and cave growth. While this influence is well recognised, how mobilised material interacts mechanically with the surrounding rock mass remains an open area of investigation; with a range of numerical formulations used in practice. This paper reviews existing coupled approaches with emphasis on how gravity flow is linked to stress redistribution. Building on this context, a new coupled formulation is introduced in which material mobilisation is represented through a controlled and progressive reduction in support and confinement at the cave boundary. The approach retains key physical mechanisms while improving computational efficiency for large-scale applications.
The methodology incorporates a dedicated gravity-flow formulation designed specifically for efficient coupling within large-scale three-dimensional cave simulations. The proposed formulation separates vertical support and lateral confinement mechanisms and introduces a locally defined propagation capacity that constrains cave growth based on flow activity and available void space. This provides a direct and physically consistent link between material movement and stress redistribution, while reducing sensitivity to coupling interval selection. The approach retains key physical mechanisms associated with cave propagation, including airgap development, overhang formation, cave stalling, and draw-strategy dependency, while remaining computationally practical for large-scale applications.
The methodology is demonstrated through a series of example applications, illustrating its ability to reproduce key cave propagation behaviours under different draw strategies and rock mass conditions.
Keywords: cave propagation, numerical modelling, continuum–flow coupling
References:
Arndt, S, Bui, T, Diering, T, Austen, I & Hocking, R 2018, ‘Integrated simulation and optimisation tools for production scheduling using finite element analysis caving geomechanics simulation coupled with 3D cellular automata’, Caving 2018: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 247–258,
Beck, D, Sharrock, G & Capes, G 2011, ‘A coupled DFE–Newtonian cellular automata scheme for simulation of cave initiation, propagation and induced seismicity’, in Proceedings of the 45th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association, Eaton.
Board, M & Pierce, M 2009, ‘A review of recent experience in modelling of caving’, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Numerical Modelling for Underground Mine Excavation Design, in conjunction with the 43rd US Rock Mechanics Symposium, NIOSH Pittsburgh Research Laboratory, Bruceton.
Cancino, C, Fuenzalida, M & Kamp, C 2024, ‘Numerical modeling of cave propagation and breakthrough timing’, in Daniel Johansson & Håkan Schunnesson (eds), MassMin 2024: Proceedings of the International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp. 548–568,
Castro, R, Oyarzo, D, Gómez, R, Suzuki, K & Cifuentes, M 2024, ‘Coupling geomechanical and gravity flow models to obtain more representative flow simulations and air-gap risk identification in caving mining’, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, vol. 49, pp. 376–390,
Castro, R, Arancibia, L, Guzman, D & Henriquez, JP 2018, 'Experiments and simulation of gravity flow in block caving through FlowSim', in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 313-322,
Diering, T 2000, ‘PC-BC: A block cave design and draw control system’, Proceedings of MassMin 2000, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Brisbane pp. 469–484.
Fuenzalida, MA, Pierce, ME & Katsaga, T 2018, ‘REBOP–FLAC3D hybrid approach to cave modelling’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 297–312,
Ghazvinian, E, Fuenzalida, M, Orrego, C & Pierce, M 2020a, 'Back analysis of cave propagation and subsidence at Cadia East Mine', in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 535-550,
Ghazvinian, E, Garza-Cruz, T, Bouzeran, L, Fuenzalida, M, Cheng, Z, Cancino, C & Pierce, M 2020b, ‘Theory and implementation of the Itasca constitutive model for advanced strain softening (IMASS)’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mass Mining (MassMin 2020), Santiago, Chile, pp. 451–461.
Gibson, WH 2014, ‘Stochastic models for gravity flow: numerical considerations’, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
Gómez, R & Castro, R 2022, ‘Stress modelling using cellular automata for block caving applications’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 154,
Hebert, Y & Sharrock, G 2018, ‘Three-dimensional simulation of cave initiation, propagation and surface subsidence using a coupled finite difference–cellular automata solution’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 151–166,
Itasca 2026, MassFlow documentation, coupling example,
doc/manual/massflow_manual/massflow_examples/massflow_coupling.html?node7502#mining
Janssen, HA 1895, ‘Versuche über Getreidedruck in Silozellen’, Zeitschrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure, vol. 39, no. 1045.
Lorig, L 2000, The role of numerical modelling in assessing caveability, report to the International Caving Study, Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minneapolis.
Pierce, M 2010, A model for gravity flow of fragmented rock in block caving mines, PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Power, GR & Campbell, AD 2016, ‘Modelling of real time marker data to improve operational recovery in SLC mines’, MassMin 2016, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference and Exhibition on Mass Mining, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.
Sainsbury, BA 2012, A model for cave propagation and subsidence assessment in jointed rock masses, PhD thesis, The University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Sharrock, GB, Beck, DA, Capes, GW & Brunton, ID 2012, ‘Applying coupled Newtonian cellular automata–discontinuum finite element models to simulate propagation of Ridgeway Deeps block cave’, Proceedings of MassMin 2012, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Westmount.