The role of rock mass modulus and structure on cave propagation behaviour

Authors: Sainsbury, B-A; Sainsbury, D

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_21

Cite As:
Sainsbury, B-A & Sainsbury, D 2026, 'The role of rock mass modulus and structure on cave propagation behaviour', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds), Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-12, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_21

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Caveability is commonly assessed using strength-based approaches. However, field observations show that cave propagation often deviates from these predictions, even when sophisticated numerical predictions are completed. This paper examines the role of rock mass modulus and damage evolution in controlling cave behaviour under excavation-induced unloading stress paths. Conceptual modelling demonstrates that for identical strength parameters, variations in rock mass modulus produce order of magnitude differences in prediction of cave height, propagation rate and tonnes extracted. Stress path analysis shows that the key difference between rock mass modulus cases is therefore not the stress path itself, but how far that path progresses towards failure. In higher stiffness rock masses, damage remains distributed and propagation is constrained, whereas lower stiffness conditions promote localisation and sustained growth and progress further towards failure. Geological structure enhances cave propagation only when intersected and when the stiffness regime permits damage localisation. The results demonstrate that in some cases, cave propagation is governed by stiffness-controlled damage evolution rather than strength exceedance alone, and that rock mass modulus must be treated as a primary input parameter in caveability assessments. However, reliable estimation of modulus remains highly uncertain, as commonly used empirical relationships can produce values that differ by an order of magnitude or more for the same rock mass. This variability introduces significant uncertainty into design and reinforces the need to more routinely characterise rock mass modulus through in situ monitoring and back-analysis.

Keywords: caving, cave propagation, cave initiation, crack damage criterion, rock mass modulus, structure

References:
Brunton, I 2009, The Impact of Blasting on Sublevel Caving Material Flow Behaviour and Recovery, PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Campbell, R, Mardiansyah, F, Banda, H, Tshisens, J, Griffiths, C & Beck, D 2020, ‘Early experiences from the Grasberg block cave: A rock mechanics perspective’, in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 115–126,
Constanzo, HE, Guerra, PC & Barindelli, GA 2020, ‘Observational rock mass damage model associated to caving advance of Chuquicamata Underground Mine’, in R Castro, F Báez & K Suzuki (eds), MassMin 2020: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 910–921,
Eberhardt, E, Stead, D & Stimpson, B 1999, ‘Quantifying progressive pre-peak brittle fracture damage in rock during uniaxial compression’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 361–380,
Gokceoglu, C, Sonmez, H & Kayabasi, A 2003, ‘Predicting the deformation moduli of rock masses’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 40, pp. 701–710,
Heap, MJ & Faulkner, DR 2008, ‘Quantifying the evolution of static elastic properties as crystalline rock approaches failure’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 45, pp. 564–573,
Hekmatnejad, A, Manscilla, F, Schachter, P, Pan, P, Mohtarami, E, Pena, A, … Gonzales, R 2025, ‘Enhancing production rates at El Teniente’s black cave mine through optimizing HF hole distribution using discrete fracture network modeling and geostatistical simulation methods’, Rock Mechanics Bulletin, vol. 4, article 100165,
Hoek, E & Diederichs, MS 2006, ‘Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 43, pp. 203–215,
ITASCA 2025, FLAC3D 9.0 Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Three-Dimensions, version 9.0, Minneapolis.
Laubscher, D 1994, ‘Cave mining—the state of the art’, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp. 279–293.
Laubscher, D 2010, A Practical Manual on Block Caving, 2nd edn, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Lett, J 2024, ‘Geotechnical lessons learnt during undercutting in deep caving at Cadia Operations’, in P Andrieux & D Cumming-Potvin (eds), Deep Mining 2024: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 109–136,
Martin, C 1993, The Strength of Massive Lac du Bonnet Granite Around Underground Openings, PhD thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
Mas Ivars, D, Pierce, ME, Darcel, C, Reyes-Montes, J, Potyondy, DO, Young, RP & Cundall, PA 2011, ‘The synthetic rock mass approach for jointed rock mass modelling’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 48, pp. 219–244,
Mathews, K 1980, Prediction of Stable Excavation Spans for Mining at Depths Below 1,000 Meters in Hard Rock, viewed 23 January 2026,
Mawdesley, C, Trueman, R & Whiten, W 2001, ‘Extending the Mathews stability graph for open-stope design’, Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Technology, vol. 110, pp. 27–39,
Reyes-Montes, J, Sainsbury, B, Pettitt, W, Pierce, M & Young, R 2016, ‘Application of cave-scale rock degradation models in the imaging of the seismogenic zone’, CIM Journal, vol. 7,
Rooz, A & Sainsbury, B 2026a, ‘Mechanical degradation of granite under excavation-induced unloading: implications for design reliability’, Results in Engineering,
Rooz, A & Sainsbury, B 2026b, ‘Geomechanical characterisation of intact Sydney sandstone (Class III) under loading and excavation-induced unloading’, Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment,
Rooz, A & Sainsbury, B 2025a, ‘Improving elastic parameter evaluation for hard brittle rock: a crack damage criterion based tangent 30 method’, Journal of Geotechnical Testing,
Rooz, A & Sainsbury, B 2025b, ‘Adelaide black granite: geomechanical characterisation for underground design’, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 72, pp. 233–251,
Sainsbury, BL 2010, ‘Sensitivities in the numerical assessment of cave propagation’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2010: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 523–535,
Sainsbury, B 2012, A Model for Cave Propagation and Subsidence Assessment in Jointed Rock Masses, PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney,
Sainsbury, B 2019, ‘Consideration of the volumetric changes that accompany rock mass failure’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 52, pp. 277–281,
Sainsbury, B, Pierce, ME & Mas Ivars, D 2008, ‘Analysis of caving behaviour using a synthetic rock mass — ubiquitous joint rock mass modelling technique’, in Y Potvin, J Carter, A Dyskin & R Jeffrey (eds), SHIRMS 2008: Proceedings of the First Southern Hemisphere International Rock Mechanics Symposium, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 243–253,
Sainsbury, B & Rooz, A 2025, ‘A geological approach for the estimation of the confined elastic modulus of rock based on the HoekBrown mi constant’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,
Sainsbury, B, Sainsbury, D & Carroll, D 2018, ‘Back-analysis of PC1 cave propagation and subsidence behaviour at the Cadia East mine’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 167–178,
Sainsbury, D, Sainsbury, B, Paetzold, H-D, Lourens, P & Vakili, A 2016, ‘Caving-induced subsidence behaviour of Lift 1 at the Palabora block cave mine’, in Seventh International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, AusIMM, Melbourne.
Snyman, L, Webster, S & Samosir, J 2016, ‘E48 cave extension at Northparkes’, in Seventh International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, AusIMM, Melbourne, pp. 111–117.
Sougarret, J, Quinones, L, Morales, R & Apablaza, R 2004, ‘New vision in caving mining in Andina Division, Codelco Chile’, in MassMin 2004, Santiago, pp. 542–546.
Stegman, C, van As, A & Peebles, E 2018, ‘Past learnings focus innovative solutions to future cave mining’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 37–42,
Tyler, DB & Godden, SJ 2008, ‘Geotechnical Modelling for Kimberlite Pipes’, in Y Potvin, J Carter, A Dyskin & R Jeffrey (eds), SHIRMS 2008: Proceedings of the First Southern Hemisphere International Rock Mechanics Symposium, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 551–564,
Van As, A & Jeffrey, R 2000, ‘Caving induced by hydraulic fracturing at Northparkes Mines’, in Girard, Liebman, Breeds & Doe (eds), Proceedings of the 4th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, Balkema, Seattle, pp. 353–360.
Woo, KS, Eberhardt, E, Rabus, B, Stead, D & Vyazmensky, A 2012, ‘Integration of field characterisation, mine production and InSAR monitoring data to constrain and calibrate 3-D numerical modelling of block caving-induced subsidence’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,




© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au