Authors: Morkel, IG

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_46

Cite As:
Morkel, IG 2026, 'Operational validity of the Es:Ep ratio for source mechanism classification in a block cave with a dense seismic network', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds), Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-21, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_46

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The ratio of S-wave to P-wave energy (Es/Ep) is a traditional parameter in mine seismology, used empirically to distinguish between shear and non-shear failure mechanisms. While moment tensor inversion (MTI) provides a far more complete physical representation of seismic sources, the Es/Ep parameter remains a practical tool for rapid assessment and back-analysis of historical catalogues. However, the reliability of standard Es/Ep thresholds is increasingly questioned due to inherent data quality challenges. This paper evaluates the operational validity of the Es/Ep parameter by statistically comparing it against the automated MTI results from a densely seismically instrumented block cave mine. The Matthews correlation coefficient is used to assess classification confidence. Across the full catalogue, the standard thresholds gave a poor correlation, driven by a dominance of MTI shear events at low Es/Ep values. The MTI reference is itself automated and coverage-dependent, so the comparison measures agreement between 2 imperfect estimators, and the conclusions are conditional on the MTI being the more reliable of the 2. Progressive filtering by the number of sensors used showed that strict sensor requirements raise the correlation to a reliable level, but at the cost of discarding the large majority of the dataset. Site-specific calibration restores diagnostic confidence yet leaves only a small fraction of events usable for single event analysis.

Keywords: mine seismology, Es/Ep, Es:Ep ratio, seismic mechanisms, moment tensor inversion

References:
Abolfazlzadeh, Y, Smith-Bougher, L, Anderson, Z, Jalbout, A & Mataseje, A 2019, ‘Calibration of a seismic hazard assessment tool using velocity fields and geotechnical data’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), MGR 2019: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 233–244, 
10.36487/ACG_rep/1905_12_Abolfazlzadeh
Boatwright, J & Fletcher, JB 1984, ‘The partition of radiated energy between P and S waves’, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 361–376.
Cai, M, Kaiser, PK & Martin, CD 1998, ‘A tensile model for the interpretation of microseismic events near underground openings’, Seismicity Caused by Mines, Fluid Injections, Reservoirs, and Oil Extraction, Springer.
Fawcett, T 2006, ‘An introduction to ROC analysis’, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861–874.
Gibowicz, S, Young, R, Talebi, S & Rawlence, D 1991, ‘Source parameters of seismic events at the Underground Research Laboratory in Manitoba, Canada: scaling relations for events with moment magnitude smaller than -2’, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 1157–1182.
Gibowicz, SJ & Kijko, A 1994, An introduction to mining seismology, Academic Press, Inc, San Diego.
Hudson, JA, Pearce, RG & Rogers, RM 1989, ‘Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor’, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 94, no. B1, pp. 765–774.
Hudyma, M & Potvin, YH 2010, ‘An engineering approach to seismic risk management in hardrock mines’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 891–906.
Ma, J, Dineva, S, Cesca, S & Heimann, S 2018, ‘Moment tensor inversion with three-dimensional sensor configuration of mining induced seismicity (Kiruna mine, Sweden)’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 213, no. 3, pp. 2147–2160.
Matthews, B 1975, ‘Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme’, Biochim Biophys Acta, vol. 405, no. 2, pp. 442–451.
Mendecki, AJ 2013, ‘Mine seismology: glossary of selected terms’, in A Malovichko & D Malovichko (eds), Proceedings of Eighth International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, RaSiM8, Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of Sciences, pp. 527–551.
Morkel, IG & Wesseloo, J 2017, ‘A technique to determine systematic shifts in microseismic databases’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Deep Mining 2017: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 105–116, 
Morkel, IG, Wesseloo, J & Harris, P 2015, ‘Highlighting and quantifying seismic data quality concerns’, in PM Dight (ed.), FMGM 2015: Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Field Measurements in Geomechanics, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 539–549, 
Morkel, IG, Wesseloo, J & Potvin, Y 2019, ‘The validity of Es/Ep as a source parameter in mining seismology’, in W Joughin (ed.), Deep Mining 2019: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, pp. 385–398, 
Reyes-Montes, JM, Sainsbury, BL, Pettitt, WS, Pierce, M & Young, RP 2010, ‘Microseismic tools for the analysis of the interaction between open pit and underground developments’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2010: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 119–131, 
10.36487/ACG_rep/1002_5_Reyes-Montes
Rigby, A 2024, ‘Physically motivated moment-tensor decomposition for mining-induced seismicity’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 236, pp. 443–455.
Sato, T 1978, ‘A note on body wave radiation from expanding tension crack’, Journal of Physics of the Earth, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 245–255.
Sweby, G, Trifu, C, Goodchild, D & Morris, L 2006, ‘High resolution seismic monitoring at Mt Keith open pit mine’, Proceedings of Golden Rocks 2006, 41st U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria.
Vavryčuk, V 2015, ‘Moment tensor decompositions revisited’, Journal of Seismology, vol. 19, pp. 231–252.




© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au