Authors: O'Connor, S; Lolon, S; Perez Strutz, C; Wafforn, M; Barich, C

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_50

Cite As:
O'Connor, S, Lolon, S, Perez Strutz, C, Wafforn, M & Barich, C 2026, 'Pre-mix model for strategic block and sublevel caving production planning', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds), Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-15, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_50

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Block and sublevel caving (BC and SLC) are highly productive mass underground mining methods, but performance is strongly influenced by material flow, mixing and draw. Pre-mixing of ore and waste prior to extraction is critical for controlling dilution, recovery and draw efficiency. This paper presents a practical, deterministic pre-mix model for BC and SLC operations that integrates gravity-based vertical flow and spatial awareness of drawpoint locations to estimate extraction ratios and mixed grades. Amplify Mine Planning has implemented cave flow pre-mix formulas within Deswik Planning, streamlining the determination of step-outs and mixed grades. This simple approach enables rapid evaluation and strategic comparison of footprints and production plans for mass mining methods (e.g. BC and SLC), resulting in significant time and cost savings in the early study phase. By leveraging standard production and custom fields, the premix model is transparent and auditable, providing clear strategic value at the conceptual study level. A case study of Pan American Silver’s La Colorada Skarn project demonstrates the model’s application and validation. Results highlight the revealed opportunities to optimise footprint location and draw strategy, and to improve ore recovery while minimising waste inflow. The model has been peer-validated against an advanced cellular automata flow modelling tool, in which the estimated pre-mix grades agree within 1% of the counterpart flow model results. The strategic pre-mix model provides a fast, cost-effective and transparent approach for early-stage mine planning. Though the method will not replace the advanced cave flow and geotechnical assessment modelling, it enables rapid generation of production plan scenarios per mining method and footprint, and parametric and sensitivity analyses, supporting informed forecasts and decisions early in the study phase. By streamlining evaluation of the method, footprint and draw strategy, the model delivers actionable insights and economic benefits. This empowers planners to optimise BC and SLC planning and forecasting with greater confidence.

Keywords: block caving, sublevel caving, pre-mixing model, rule-based mixing, mine planning, mass mining, production forecast

References:
Bull, G & Page, CH 2000, Sublevel caving-today’s dependable low-cost ore factory’, in G Chitombo (ed.), Massmin 2000, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp. 537-556.
Castro, R, Arancibia, L, Guzman, D & Henriquez, J, 2018, ‘Experiments and simulation of gravity flow in block caving through FlowSim’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds.), Caving 2018: Proceeding of the 4th International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 313–322,
Diering, T 2007, ‘Template mixing: an alternative depletion engine for block cave scheduling’, APCOM 2007, University of Chile, Santiago, pp. 313–320.
Hochbaum, D 2008, ‘The Pseudoflow algorithm: a new algorithm for the maximum-flow problem’, Journal of Operations Research, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 992–1009.
Hocking, R & Smith, M, 2024, ‘Caving resources and reserves: defining a process for understanding variability and appropriate classification across global codes through project life’, in D Johansson & H Schunnesson (eds), Massmin 2024: Proceedings of the International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp. 132–141,
Laubscher, D 1994, ‘Cave mining – the state of the art’, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, October 1994, pp. 279–293.
Laubscher, D 2000, A Practical Manual on Block Caving, The International Block Caving Study.
Laubscher, DH & Jakubec, J 2000, ‘The MRMR rock mass rating classification system in mining practice’, Massmin 2000, pp. 413–421.
Pan American Silver 2023, Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report for the La Colorada Property, Zacatecas.
Pan American Silver 2026, NI 43-101 Technical Report for the La Colorada Property, Zacatecas.
Pierce, M 2010, A Model for Gravity Flow of Fragmented Rock in Block Caving Mines, PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Power, G 2012, ‘Optimizing caving recovery using comparative draw planning strategies and PGCA flow modelling software’, Massmin 2012: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Sudbury.




© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au