DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_51
Cite As:
Fuenzalida, M & Dunn, MJ 2026, 'Impact of crosscut spacing on recovery and dilution at Jwaneng underground project', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-15,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_51
Abstract:
Jwaneng mine is transitioning from open pit to underground mining using a combination of blasthole open stoping, sublevel retreat, sublevel caving (SLC) and block caving methods. The orebody comprises three kimberlite pipes (North, Central and South), with the Central pipe being the focus of this study.
A 3D numerical caving model was developed to evaluate the influence of crosscut spacing on recovery and dilution within the Central pipe. Three spacings (15, 18 and 21 m) were assessed under a common draw strategy. The model incorporates key geomechanical inputs relevant to SLC performance, including fragmentation characteristics and blast ring behaviour, by constraining material flow within each blasted ring.
Model results are presented in terms of both recovery and dilution. As crosscut spacing increases, an evident decrease in global recovery is observed, consistent with decreased overlap of adjacent flow zones. Dilution and recovery trends are also evaluated and compared against published benchmarks from established SLC operations, providing context for the expected performance range for the Jwaneng underground project.
Keywords: sublevel caving, recovery, dilution, numerical modelling, Jwaneng underground
References:
Brunton, I 2009, The Impact of Blasting on Sublevel Caving Material Flow Behaviour and Recovery, PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Campbell, AD 2018, ‘Effects of blast ring burden and explosive density on fragmentation and ore recovery in sublevel cave mines’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 457–470,
Campbell, AD 2022, ‘A global review of recovery, dilution and draw control in sublevel caving mines’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 909–926,
Dunstan, G & Power, G 2011, ‘Sub level caving’, in P Darling (ed.), SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd edn, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Englewood.
ITASCA 2025, MassFlow, version 9.4, computer software.
Maripuu, R 1968, Undersökning av Siktanalys och Styckeform från Skivrasbrytningen vid LKAB, Kiruna (Investigation of Fragment Size and Shape from Sublevel Caving at LKAB, Kiruna), master’s thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
Pierce, ME 2010, A model for Gravity Flow of Fragmented Rock in Block Caving Mines, PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Power, GR 2004, Modelling Granular Flow in Caving Mines: Large Scale Physical Modelling and Full Scale Experiments, PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Wimmer, M, Kangas, J & Ouchterlony, F 2008, The Fragment Size Distribution of Kiruna Magnetite Loaded from a Draw Point – Evaluation and Analysis of a Full-Scale Test, Report 2008:P2, Swebrec - Swedish Blasting Research Centre, Luleå.