DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_53
Cite As:
Hutahaean, MB, Sta Ana, AL & Simanjuntak, K 2026, 'A structured decision-making framework for block cave design at Oyu Tolgoi mine', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-13,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_53
Abstract:
The Hugo North deposit features a staged macroblock and multi-lift block cave design. The upper lift is currently in production, while the lower lift remains at the study stage. As a part of the study, numerous design trade-offs are being considered. Given the distinctive shape, extent of the orebody, geological structures, relative location to the previous lift, and economic factors, there are significant complexities and requirements to satisfy various criteria when making these decisions.
To produce sound and visible decisions on the trade-offs, a decision assessment process has been introduced and implemented, namely the multi-criteria analysis (MCA). The MCA methodology is a systematic and transparent approach, enabling measured comparisons between options within the decision-making process. Relatively similar concepts were used in the previous lift study. This paper focuses on the MCA framework, guidelines and application to several decisions throughout the study work at the Oyu Tolgoi mine.
References:
AMC Consultants & Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd 2020, Oyu Tolgoi 2020 Technical Report.
Burge, S 2009, ‘Pugh Matrix (PM): what is it and what does it do?’, The Systems Engineering Tool Box, Burge Hughes Walsh, Rugby.
Dean, M 2022, A Practical Guide to Multi-Criteria Analysis, University College London.
Keeney, RL 1992, Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Keeney, RL 1996, ‘Value-focused thinking: identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 537–549.
Parnell, GS 2007, ‘Value-focused thinking’, in AG Loerch & LB Rainey (eds), Methods for Conducting Military Operational Analysis: Best Practices Throughout the Department of Defense, Military Operations Research Society, Arlington.
Pugh, S 1991, Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Wokingham.
Saaty, TL 1990, ‘How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26.
Saaty, TL 2003, ‘Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 85–91.
Saaty, TL 2008, ‘Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process’, International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98.
Sta Ana, AL 2025, Oyu Tolgoi Drive-Orientation MCA Workbook, internal report, OT T&SMP, Rio Tinto, Brisbane.
Sta Ana, AV 2026, Oyu Tolgoi Access–Decline Tie-In MCA Workbook, internal report, OT T&SMP, Rio Tinto, Brisbane.
Worley 2026, OT HNNP Trade Off Studies: Trade-Off Study Report for Crusher Technology Options, report no. C0014-0000-00-REP-00024, rev. A, prepared for Oyu Tolgoi LLC.