DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_64
Cite As:
Jaimes, A & Birch, DJ 2026, 'The utility of passive seismic attenuation tomography for monitoring changes
in a block caving mine', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-16,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_64
Abstract:
Travel-time tomography is a powerful non-invasive imaging technique that uses the first arrival travel times of P-waves (tp) and S-waves (ts) to infer the velocity of the medium through which seismic waves travel. This methodology has been successfully applied at block caving mines to map spatial and temporal variations in seismic velocities, which are then correlated to changes in the stress state of the rock mass. Much of this success can be attributed to the fact that, in general, seismic travel times, as well as ray paths, are significantly perturbed by the presence of the block cave. Despite their usefulness, velocity tomograms may not properly quantify areas of strong stress fracturing since variations in lithological properties can have a similar effect on the propagation time of seismic waves. Seismic quality factor (Q-1) maps reflect the attenuation of seismic energy, which is highly sensitive to the extent of fracturing and crack accumulation. At block cave mines one is interested in tracking high stress areas. It is therefore beneficial to compute both 3D velocity and Q-1 maps.
In this work, we showcase a passive seismic attenuation tomography workflow to image both the velocity and attenuation structure through which seismic waves propagate. We first validate our framework with synthetic tests that use realistic source-to-receiver configurations, as well as physically meaningful velocity and attenuation models computed empirically from numerical stress models. We then use this methodology to obtain velocity and attenuation tomograms from passive seismic data recorded at an Australian block caving mine. These seismic data span a 12-month period and contain records from geophones and distributed acoustic sensing. The velocity and attenuation maps that were obtained are in agreement with previously estimated yielded zones. The attenuation maps, in particular, clearly delineate the progression of the yielded zone. The methodology that we present, and the associated results, highlight the potential of attenuation tomography to image high stress areas around block caving mines, which is of importance for geotechnical analyses.
Keywords: seismicity, caving, seismic tomography, seismic attenuation
References:
Abolfazlzadeh, Y & Hudyma, M 2016, ‘Identifying and describing a seismogenic zone in a sublevel caving mine’, RockMechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 49, pp. 3735–3751,
Baig, AM, Bosman, K & Urbancic, TI 2017, ‘Temporal changes in stress state imaged through seismic tomography’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Deep Mining 2017: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 269–273,
Birch, D, Basson, G & Rigby, A 2022, Temporal Changes in Stress State Imaged Through Seismic Tomography, technical report, Institute of Mine Seismology
Brown, LG & Hudyma, MR 2018, ‘Identifying a migrating stress front using apparent stress for an unplanned rock mass cave’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 565–576,
Brune, JN 1970, ‘Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes’, Journal of Geophysical Research , vol. 75, no. 26, pp. 4997–5009,
Clawson, S, Smith, R & Benz, H 1989, ‘P wave attenuation of the Yellowstone Caldera from three-dimensional inversion of spectral decay using explosion source seismic data’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 94, pp. 7205–7222,
Debski, W & Young, RP 1999, ‘Enhanced velocity tomography: Practical method of combining velocity and attenuation parameters’, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 26, no. 21, pp. 3253–3256,
Duplancic, P & Brady, BH 1999, ‘Characterization of caving mechanisms by analysis of seismicity and rock stress’, Proceedings 9th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, vol. 2, pp. 1049–1053.
Flores-Gonzalez, G 2019, ‘Major hazards associated with cave mining: are they manageable?’, in J Wesseloo (ed.), MGR 2019: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 31–46,
Glazer, SN & Hepworth, N 2005, ‘Seismicity Induced by cave mining, Palabora experience’, in Y Potvin & M Hudyma (eds), RaSiM6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Rockburst and Seismicity in Mines Proceedings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 281–289,
Guo, H & Thurber, C 2021, ‘Double-difference seismic attenuation tomography and its application to The Geysers geothermal field, California’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 926–949,
Hidayat, W, Sahara, DP, Widiyantoro, S, Suharsono, S, Riyanto, E, Nukman, M, … Ambata Putra, IPR 2024, ‘4D time lapse tomography for monitoring cave propagation and stress distribution in deep mill level zone (DMLZ) PT Freeport Indonesia’, Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, vol. 10, no. 39,
Hu, J, Qian, J, Song, J, Ouyang, M, Cao, J & Leung, S 2021, ‘Eulerian partial-differential-equation methods for complex-valued eikonals in attenuating media’, Geophysics, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 179–192, https//doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0659.1
Hudyma, M, Potvin, Y & Allisons, D 2008, ‘Seismic monitoring of the Northparkes Lift 2 block cave - Part I undercutting’, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 405–419,
Jagtap, AD & Karniadakis, GE 2023, ‘How important are activation functions in regression and classification? a survey, performance comparison, and future directions’, Journal of Machine Learning for Modelling and Computing, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21–75, http//dx.doi.org/10.1615/JMachLearnModelComput.2023047367
Jaimes, MA, Rigby, A, Birch, D & Lotter, E 2025a, ‘Noninvasive imaging of the underground via travel-time tomography: overview and recent developments’, in S Dineva (ed.), RaSiM11: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp. 337–355.
Jaimes, MA, Malovichko, D, Lotter, E, Rigby, A & Birch, D 2025b, ‘Target-oriented Imaging of the underground: tracking the growth of cave damage zones using seismic travel times’, in S Dineva (ed.), RaSiM11: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp. 466–484.
Kamp, C, Conley, A, Collins, DS, Preiksaitis, M, Butler, T & Shumila, V 2022, ‘Use of seismic tomography to aid rock mechanics interpretation at New Afton B3 block cave mine’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 461–472,
Kim, S 2001, ‘The most energetic traveltime of seismic waves’, Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 313–319,
Kingma, D & Ba, J 2014, ‘Adam: a method for stochastic optimization’, CoRR,
Lees, J & Lindley, G 1994, ‘Three-dimensional attenuation tomography at Loma Prieta: Inverting of t* for Q’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , vol. 99, pp. 6843–6863,
Liu, Y & Tong, P 2021, ‘Eikonal equation-based P-wave seismic azimuthal anisotropy tomography of the crustal structure beneath northern California’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 287–301,
Mercier, JP, de Beer, W, Mercier, JP & Morris, S 2015, ‘Evolution of a block cave from time-lapse passive source body-wave traveltime tomography’, Geophysics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 85–97,
Nairn, JA 2003, ‘Material point method calculations with explicit cracks’, Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 649–664,
Perras, M, & Diederichs, M 2016, ‘Predicting excavation damage zones in brittle rocks’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 60–74,
Raissi, M, Perdikaris, P & Karniadakis, GE 2019, ‘Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations’, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707,
Sainsbury, B 2012, A Model for Cave Propagation and Subsidence Assessment in Jointed Rock Masses, PhD thesis, UNSW, Sydney.
Schmidhuber, J 2015, ‘Deep learning in neural networks: an overview’, Neural Networks, vol. 61, pp. 85–117, http//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
Treister, E & Haber, E 2016, ‘A fast marching algorithm for the factored eikonal equation’, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 324, pp. 210–225,
Vidale, JE 1990, ‘Finite-difference calculation of traveltimes in three dimensions’, Geophysics, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 521–526,
Wang, D, Chen, J, Wu, S, Li, T, Bai, Y, Gao, Y & Tong, P 2025, ‘Adjoint-State Attenuation Tomography: Method and Application to Northern New Zealand, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , vol. 130, no. 11,
Watanabe, T & Sassa, K 1996, ‘Seismic attenuation tomography and its application to rock mass evaluation’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 467–477,
Watanabe, Y, Matsuoka, T & Ashida, Y 1999, ‘Seismic traveltime tomography using Fresnel volume approach’, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp. 1402–1405,
Westman, E, Luxbacher, K & Schafrik, S 2012, ‘Passive seismic tomography for three-dimensional time-lapse imaging of mining-induced rock mass changes’, The Leading Edge, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 338–345,