Geotechnical characterisation of Hugo North Lift 1, Oyu Tolgoi

Authors: Rwodzi, L; Ekkerd, J; Taylor, M; Batsaikhan, A; Russo, A; Ramírez, C; Hormazábal, E; Nur, J

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_73

Cite As:
Rwodzi, L, Ekkerd, J, Taylor, M, Batsaikhan, A, Russo, A, Ramírez, C, Hormazábal, E & Nur, J 2026, 'Geotechnical characterisation of Hugo North Lift 1, Oyu Tolgoi', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds), Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-19, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_73

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Most major block cave operations in the world are hosted in porphyry orebodies, which pose significant geotechnical characterisation challenges due to their heterogenous and hydrothermally altered nature. The Hugo North Lift 1 block cave at Oyu Tolgoi is a large-footprint, deep cave hosted within a structurally complex porphyry system subjected to high stresses and exhibiting moderate to low strength rock mass conditions. A comprehensive geotechnical block model covering the multiple production blocks at Oyu Tolgoi was developed over several years. Geotechnical units were defined using lithology, alteration, weak veinlet density and fault models, supplemented by drillhole composites. Fundamental rock mass characterisation parameters obtained from drillcore logging and underground tunnel mapping were estimated using statistical and geostatistical methods to populate the geotechnical block model. Extensive intact rock strength testing was also undertaken to inform the Hoek–Brown rock strength parameters adopted into the block model, and a dedicated methodology was developed to capture fault strength properties. The resulting characterisation workflow and integrated block model have directly supported improved inputs into footprint stability assessments, fragmentation predictions, caveability and subsidence assessments, and have reduced geotechnical uncertainty in Hugo North Lift 1 design and sequencing. This paper presents the characterisation methodology, resulting geotechnical insights for this complex porphyry orebody, and highlights key lessons learnt.

References:
Bandis, S, Lumsden, A C & Barton, N 1981, ‘Experimental studies of scale effects on the shear behaviour of rock joints’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–21.
Barton, N & Bandis, S 1980, ‘Some effects of scale on the shear strength of joints’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics, Mining Sciences and Geomechanical Abstracts, vol. 17, pp. 69–73.
Barton, N & Choubey, V 1977, ‘The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice’, Rock Mechanics, vol. 10, pp. 1–54.
Bewick, R, Brzovic, A, Rogers, S, Griffiths, C & Otto, SA 2022, ‘Benchmarking framework for porphyry copper-gold rock masses for caveability and fragmentation decision-making’, in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1303–1318, 
10.36487/ACG_repo/2205_91
Bieniawski, ZT 1989, Engineering Rock Mass Classifications: A Complete Manual for Engineers and Geologists in Mining, Civil, And Petroleum Engineering, Wiley-Interscience Publication - John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Brzovic, A & Villaescusa, E 2007, ‘Rock mass characterization and assessment of block-forming geological discontinuities during caving of primary copper ore at the El Teniente mine, Chile’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 565–583.
Day, JM, Diederichs, MS & Hutchinson, DJ 2019, ‘Composite geological strength index approach with application to hydrothermal vein networks and intact bridges within shear zones’, Engineering Geology, vol. 261, 105228.
Goodman, RE 1989, Introduction to Rock Mechanics, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Grimstad, E & Barton, N 1993, ‘Updating of the Q-System for NMT’, in R Kompen, OA Opsahl & KR Berg (eds), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sprayed Concrete, Norwegian Concrete Association, Fagernes, pp. 46–66.
Hoek, E, Kaiser, P K & Bawden, W F 1995, Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam.
Hoek, E, Carranza-Torres, C & Corkum, B 2002, ‘Hoek-Brown failure criterion – 2002 Edition’, in Proceedings of NARMS-TAC 2002: Mining Innovation and Technology (pp. 267-273), University of Toronto, Toronto, pp. 267–273.
Hoek, E, Carter, T G & Diederichs, M S 2013, ‘Quantification of the geological strength index chart’, Proceedings of the 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium 2013, vol. 13-672, no. 3, pp. 1757–1764.
Hoek, E & Martin, C 2014, ‘Fracture initiation and propagation in intact rock–a review’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 287–300.
Hoek, E & Brown, ET 2019, ‘The Hoek–Brown failure criterion and GSI – 2018 edition’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 445–463.
Jakubec, J & Laubscher, DH 2000, ‘The MRMR rock mass rating classification system in mining practice’, Proceedings of MASSMIN 2000, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.
Laubscher, D 1990, ‘Geomechanics classification system for the rating of rock mass in mine design’, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 257–273.
Laubscher, DH 2000, Block Caving Manual, prepared for the International Caving Study, Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, Brisbane.
Laubscher, D & Jakubec, J 2001, ‘The MRMR Rock Mass Classification for Jointed Rock Masses’, in W Hustrulid & R Bullock (eds), Underground Mining Methods, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc. (SME)., Littleton, pp. 475–481.
Mogi, K 1966, ‘Pressure Dependence of Rock Strength and Transition from Brittle Fracture to Ductile Flow’, Earthquake Research Institute University of Tokyo, vol. 44, pp. 215–343.
Rocscience 2016, RocData, computer software, Vancouver, https://www.rocscience.com/support/rocdata/
Russo, A & Hormazábal, E 2016, ‘A methodology to select valid results from lab tests to estimate properties of intact rock with microdefects’, American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria.
Russo, A & Hormazábal, E 2019, ‘Correlations between Various Rock Mass Classifications Systems, Including Laubscher (MRMR), Bieniawski (RMR), Barton (Q)and Hoek and Marinos (GSI) Systems’, in XVI Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 2806–2815.
Russo, A, Montiel, E & Hormazabal, E 2022, 'Impact of the typical errors in geotechnical core logging for geomechanical design in large caving mines', in Y Potvin (ed.), Caving 2022: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1319–1334, 
Stavropoulou, M, Exadaktylos, G & Saratsis, G 2007, ‘A combined three-dimensional geological-geostatistical-numerical model of underground excavations in rock’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 213–243.
Turichshev, A & Hadjigeorgiou, J 2016, ‘Triaxial compression experiments on intact veined rock’, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 445–458.
van As, A & Noppe, M 2024, ‘Sufficient geotechnical data for reliable mine design during mining studies’, in D Johansson & H Schunnesson (eds), MassMin 2024: Proceedings of the International Conference & Exhibition on Mass Mining, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp. 194–207, 




© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au