DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_85
Cite As:
Czarny, R, Birch, DJ, Enslin, R, Goldswain, G, Pilkington, J & Sanker Pararath, G 2026, 'Enhancing cave seismic monitoring with distributed acoustic sensing and template matching', in A van As, D Cumming-Potvin & J Wesseloo (eds),
Caving 2026: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-11,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2645_85
Abstract:
Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) is increasingly deployed in underground mining to support seismic monitoring due to its dense spatial coverage and flexible installation. Despite these advantages, the use of DAS for cave-front tracking has not yet been fully explored.
This study presents the application of a well-known seismological template-matching method to DAS data to improve the detection of weak, repeating seismic events associated with cave establishment firings. TheĀ approach relies on waveform templates selected from previously identified events and applies them to continuous DAS records to search for similar signals, including weak events that may be missed by standard detection procedures used in conventional underground geophone arrays. By increasing the number of detected events, the approach enhances the effective spatial resolution of microseismic observations in the cave environment.
The workflow is demonstrated using DAS data acquired during active cave development at an underground mining operation. The results show that the method increases the number of detected events and better defines the seismicity pattern associated with cave establishment firing. The resulting catalogue provides a clearer view of the rock mass response to mining and supports more reliable cave-tracking interpretation.
Overall, the results demonstrate that template matching can substantially extend the practical capability of DAS-based microseismic monitoring for cave-tracking applications. The approach integrates with existing monitoring workflows and adds value without requiring changes to acquisition geometry or hardware.
References:
Gal, M, Lotter, E, Olivier, G, Green, M, Meyer, S, Dales, P & Reading, AM 2021, ‘CCLoc: an improved interferometric seismic event location algorithm applied to induced seismicity’, Seismological Research Letters, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 3492–3503.
Gibbons, SJ & Ringdal, F 2006, ‘The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 149–166.
Hartog, AH 2017, An Introduction to Distributed Optical Fibre Sensors, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Herrmann, M, Kraft, T & Clinton, J 2019, ‘Matched-filter earthquake detection and the influence of noise and template selection’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 124, pp. 1–18.
Li, Z & Zhan, Z 2018, ‘Pushing the limit of earthquake detection with distributed acoustic sensing and template matching: a case study at the Brady geothermal field’, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 1583–1593,
gji/ggy359
Ross, ZE, Trugman, DT, Hauksson, E & Shearer, PM 2019, ‘Searching for hidden earthquakes in Southern California’, Science, vol. 364, no. 6442, pp. 767–771.
Saad, OM & Alkhalifah, T 2026, ‘Distributed acoustic sensing denoising using a self-supervised conditional diffusion model’, Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 74, no. 3, e70154.
Shelly, DR, Beroza, GC & Ide, S 2007, ‘Non-volcanic tremor and low-frequency earthquake swarms’, Nature, vol. 446, pp. 305–307.