Authors: de Oliveira, LA; de Oliveira, ÂH; de Souza, CS; Beteli Silva Zanon, B; Beirigo, EA

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2655_30

Cite As:
de Oliveira, LA, de Oliveira, ÂH, de Souza, CS, Beteli Silva Zanon, B & Beirigo, EA 2026, 'Liquefaction in tailings dams: critical assessment of susceptibility in underflow tailings', in AB Fourie, M Horta, M Oliveira & S Wilson (eds), Paste 2026: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-10, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2655_30

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Liquefaction in tailings storage structures represents one of the most critical instability mechanisms in geotechnical works. In such systems, the presence of fine-grained, unconsolidated, and saturated materials promotes a sudden loss of shear strength under undrained loading, particularly in contexts where contractive behaviour predominates. The assessment of liquefaction susceptibility requires an integrated approach, grounded in detailed geotechnical investigations, representative laboratory testing, and interpretive models based on critical state soil mechanics. In this context, the present study investigates the liquefaction susceptibility of a cyclone-deposited tailings dam with underflow material, constructed using the centreline method. The analysis is based on the reinterpretation of geotechnical data obtained from field and laboratory campaigns. Seismic piezocone tests (SCPTu) were employed and interpreted according to the methodologies proposed by Robertson (2009), Jefferies & Been (2016), and Plewes et al. (2017), enabling the identification of zones with predominantly dilative behaviour, as well as the detection of localised layers exhibiting contractive tendencies. This interpretation was complemented by undrained triaxial tests and the evaluation of state parameters, allowing for the vertical discretisation of the tailings based on their mechanical response. Saturated zones exhibiting contractive behaviour were incorporated into stability analyses through limit equilibrium methods, considering critical piezometric conditions. Despite compliance with regulatory criteria, the presence of liquefiable materials highlights the importance of real-time monitoring, continuous geotechnical characterisation, and the adoption of robust preventive strategies in the risk management of tailings dam stability.

Keywords: liquefaction, tailings dams, SCPTu tests, contractive behaviour, critical state

References:
ASTM International 2012, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft³ (600 kN-m/m³)) (ASTM D698 – 12e2), West Conshohocken.
Been, K & Jefferies, M 1985, ‘A state parameter for sands’, Geotechnique, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 99–112,
Bolton, MD 1986, ‘The strength and dilatancy of sands’, Geotechnique, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 65–78,
Casagrande, A 1975, ‘Liquefaction and cyclic deformation of sands’, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, vol. 91, no. SM4, pp. 1–35.
da Costa, F, Silva, R & Souza, P 2024, ‘Liquefaction susceptibility of iron ore tailings dams: a case study’, Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 35–50.
da Costa, GCLR, Gomes, GJC & Nierwinski, HP 2024, ‘Susceptibility to liquefaction of iron ore tailings in upstream dams considering drainage conditions based on seismic piezocone tests’, Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 14, 6129,
Fourie, AB, Jewell, R & McPhail, K 2021, Mine Waste Management, 3rd edn, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth.
Jefferies, M & Been, K 2016, Soil Liquefaction: A Critical State Approach, 2nd edn, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Jewell, R & Fourie, AB 2015, Tailings Management: Facility Design and Operational Practice, 3rd edn, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Kramer, SL 1996, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Lancellotta, R 1996, ‘Liquefaction susceptibility of tailings dams’, Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 347–358.
Mesri, G & Castro, J 1987, ‘Contractive and dilative behavior of soils’, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 289–303.
Olson, SM & Stark, TD 2001, Liquefied Strength Ratio From Liquefaction Flow Failure Case Histories, Technical report, US Army Corps of Engineers/University of Washington.
Plewes, HD, Davies, MP & Jefferies, MG 1992 ‘CPT-based screening procedure for evaluating liquefaction susceptibility’, Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Canadian Geotechnical Society, The Canadian Geotechnical Society, Toronto, pp. 41–49.
Plewes, L & Robertson, PK 2010, ‘Use of CPTu for assessing liquefaction potential in tailings and soils’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 185–201,
Plewes, L, Robertson, PK & Mayne, P 2017, ‘Advanced interpretation of seismic CPTu data for tailings characterization’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 214–230.
Robertson, PK & Fear, CE 1995, ‘Liquefaction of sands and its evaluation’, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1253–1289.
Robertson, PK 2009, ‘Interpretation of cone penetration tests – a unified approach’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1337–1355,
Robertson, PK 2016, ‘Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system — an update’ Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1910–1927,
Sadrekarimi, A 2014, ‘Static liquefaction-triggering analysis considering soil dilatancy’, Soils and Foundations, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 955–966,
Schofield, AN & Wroth, PL 1968, Critical State Soil Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.
Seed, HB & Idriss, IM 1982, Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, Monograph 5, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley.




© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au