Authors: Schröder, K; Keller, D-E

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2655_43

Cite As:
Schröder, K & Keller, D-E 2026, 'Technology comparison of red mud filtration: assessment of washing and de-liquoring performance of vacuum drum filters versus filter presses', in AB Fourie, M Horta, M Oliveira & S Wilson (eds), Paste 2026: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-9, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2655_43

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
Bauxite residue, commonly called red mud after its colour, is the main byproduct of making alumina by the Bayer process. The quantity and quality of red mud, as well as the volume and the caustic content of the adherent liquor, differs widely in various refineries. Alongside the essentially non-soluble constituents of bauxite, such as iron and titanium minerals, red mud also contains some undissolved soluble alumina minerals and other compounds such as sodium aluminium hydrosilicates which are formed during processing. Common methods for red mud filtration include filter presses and vacuum drum filters – technologies with very different operating principles, investment costs and impacts on the end product. This paper compares these commonly used red mud filtration technologies, considering general operating principles, washing and de-liquoring efficiency, as well as the residual moisture achieved. The theoretical comparison of the operating principles and their impact on the red mud is illustrated with practical examples from both laboratory tests and operational experience. The objective of this paper is to outline the optimal approach to obtain red mud with the lowest amount of adherent liquor and the lowest concentration of solutes.

Keywords: red mud filtration, vacuum drum filter, filter press, technology comparison, vacuum filtration, hyper-baric operation, washing efficiency, de-liquoring efficiency

References:
Alunorte 2011, ‘Evaluation of process impacts of using filter presses for the dewatering of red mud’, Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.A., Barcarena.
Day, M 2010, ‘Hungary threatened by ‘ecological catastrophe’ as toxic sludge escapes factory’, The Telegraph UK, viewed 28 September 2025,
Gerards, M & Panholzer, M 2025, ‘Dry stacking of iron ore tailings: how Brazilian operations inspired filter press technology advances’, in AB Fourie, A Copeland, V Daigle & C MacRobert (eds), Paste 2025: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 77–88,
/ACG_repo/2555_04
Keller, D 2011, Internal Test Report CBA Brazil, ANDRITZ KMPT GmbH, Vierkirchen.
Kormányzati Kommunikációért Felelős Államtitkárság 2010, Red Sludge Alumina Plant Accident, Devecser.
Raberger, R 2016, Internal Test Report SGS Minerals Red Mud, ANDRITZ AG, Graz.
Riemer, H, Oeberg, N, Perchthaler, H, Murgia, P & Noriega, M 2000, ‘Red mud dewatering and washing process’, US Patent US6033579A, viewed 27 September 2025,
Rousseaux, J-M, Langlois, B, Boufounos, D & Cuneo-Raffaelli, A 2008, ‘Bauxite residue filtration experience in Gardanne and aluminium de Greece alumina plant’, 8th International Alumina Quality Workshop, AQW, Darwin City, pp. 162–167.
Steinlechner, E, Oeberg, N & Kern, R 1996, ‘Red mud, a challenge for filtration’, 4th International Alumina Quality Workshop, AQW, Darwin City, pp. 251–261.




© Copyright 2026, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au