DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2655_47
Cite As:
de Almeida, TFS, Melo, TC, Norberto, AS & Barros, ML 2026, 'Integrating building information modelling and environmental, social and governance strategies
for the sustainable management of filtered tailings storage facilities', in AB Fourie, M Horta, M Oliveira & S Wilson (eds),
Paste 2026: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1-15,
https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2655_47
Abstract:
The mining industry faces growing expectations to manage environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks with demonstrable controls and traceability, particularly for filtered tailings storage facilities. This paper proposes an integrated framework in which building information modelling (BIM) provides the digital engineering baseline (geometry, quantities, interfaces and constructability constraints) and advanced work packaging (AWP) translates this baseline into executable work packages with QA/QC hold points, which are then used as structured inputs to hazard identification and risk assessment and failure mode and effects analysis aligned with the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM). BIM requirements were defined for dry-stack layout, drainage and water management systems, and compaction logistics, and models were developed on the Autodesk software to simulate tailings placement and construction sequencing. The BIM-derived elements (e.g. drainage networks, slopes, haul roads and sequencing interfaces) supported failure mode definition and consequence mapping, while AWP enabled control implementation through workpackage-level responsibilities, acceptance criteria and inspection gates. For example, drainage segments with low slope and high sedimentation potential were flagged in the model, translated into dedicated installation work package (IWPs) with inspection gates, and linked to water quality monitoring points, reducing the likelihood and consequence of turbidity exceedances. Using this approach,
74 inherent ESG-related risks were identified, predominantly medium and high. After implementing the BIM/AWPinformed controls, high risks decreased from 33 to 1%, while low-risk scenarios increased from 5 to 45%. Key actions included drainage enhancement, revegetation planning, and environmental monitoring linked to model objects and work packages for auditability. The proposed framework advances digital and sustainable management of filtered tailings facilities by explicitly connecting engineering information, execution governance, and ESG risk reduction within a GISTM-compatible structure.
Keywords: digital engineering, risk assessment, dry stacking, decarbonisation, mine waste governance
References:
ABNT 2003, ABNT NBR 8681: Ações e Segurança nas Estruturas – Procedimento (Actions and Safety in Structures – Procedure), Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro.
ABNT 2006, ABNT NBR 15421: Projeto de Estruturas Resistentes a Aismos – Procedimento (Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures – Procedure), Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro.
ABNT 2018, ABNT NBR ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management – Guidelines, Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro.
ABNT 2021, ABNT NBR IEC 31010:2021 – Gestão de Riscos – Técnicas de Avaliação de Riscos (Risk Management – Risk Assessment Techniques), Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, Rio de Janeiro.
ANM 2022, ANM Resolution No. 95, of 7 February 2022, National Mining Agency, Brasília.
Azhar, S 2011, ‘Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry’, Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 241–252,
CONAMA 2005, Resolution No. 357, of 17 March 2005, National Council for the Environment, Brasília.
CONAMA 2009, Resolution No. 420, of 28 December 2009, National Council for the Environment, Brasília.
CONAMA 2018, Resolution No. 491, of 19 December 2018, National Council for the Environment, Brasília.
Construction Industry Institute 2020, AWP education framework (Version 1.0), AWP Education & Outreach Subcommittee.
Environmental Resources Management 2023, Sustainability Report 2023, viewed 8 February 2026,
FGV EAESP n.d., Programa Brasileiro GHG Protocol (Brazilian GHG Protocol Program), viewed 23 May 2025,
Global Reporting Initiative 2021, GRI Standards, viewed 8 February 2026,
Global Tailings Review, International Council on Mining and Metals, United Nations Environment Programme & Principles for Responsible Investment 2021, Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management, viewed 8 February 2026,
Hagan, A, Munoz, A & Kivunja, C 2021, ‘Implementing advanced work packaging in the mining industry: challenges and solutions’, Journal of Mining Science, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1124–1142,
Imbrogiano, J P, Schaltegger, S & Boiral, O 2025, ‘Management responses to climate change: an analysis of scholarly recommendations’, Sustainable Development, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 6680–6692.
International Association for Impact Assessment 2015, Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects, viewed 8 February 2026,
International Council on Mining and Metals 2022, Conformance protocols for the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management, London, viewed 8 February 2026,
International Finance Corporation 2012, Performance Standard 1: Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts, viewed 8 February 2026,
International Organization for Standardization 2015, ISO 14001:2015 — Environmental Management Systems — Requirements with Guidance for Use, Geneva.
Kivunja, C & Dalmaris, P 2020, ‘Digital technologies in mining: Revolutionizing the industry for a sustainable future’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 258, p. 120892,
Ministério do Meio Ambiente 2016, Plano Nacional de Adaptação à Mudança do Clima – PNA (National Adaptation Plan to Climate Change – PNA), viewed 23 may 2025,
Morrison, TH, Adger, WN, Brown, K, Lemos, MC, Huitema, D, Phelps, J, Evans, L, Cohen, P, Song, AM, Turner, R, Quinn, T & Hughes, TP 2019, ‘The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 57, p. 101934,
Müller, S, Schmeichel, K & Winkler, T 2019, ‘Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in mining operations: a case study of selected mining processes’, Resources Policy, vol. 60, pp. 511–519,
Staletović, N 2013, ‘Methods for risk management of mining excavator through FMEA and FMECA’, Mining and Metallurgy Engineering, viewed 8 February 2026,
Sukte, NB & Sanjay, M 2024, ‘Hazard identification and risk analysis (HIRA) in mining industry’, International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–41, viewed 8 February 2026,
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures 2017, Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures: Final Report, Financial Stability Board, viewed 8 February 2026,
TPF Engenharia 2023, Aplicação da Metodologia HIRA em Projetos de Mineração (Application of the HIRA Methodology in Mining Projects), viewed 8 February 2026,
United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative 2024, 2024 Climate Risk Landscape Report, viewed 8 February 2026,