Andrews, PG & Barsanti, BJ 2008, 'Results of the Radius Factor Stability Assessment Method for Design and Pillar Extraction at the Conqueror Mine, St Ives Gold Mine', in Y Potvin, J Carter, A Dyskin & R Jeffrey (eds), Proceedings of the First Southern Hemisphere International Rock Mechanics Symposium
, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 163-177, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/808_06
A reliable stability assessment for stoping is critical at the design stage of mining and the Conqueror mine at Gold Fields’ St Ives operations is no exception. The mining method at Conqueror was longhole open stoping with diminishing rib to island pillars.
The Mathews Stability Graph Method (SG) was initially used to assess the Conqueror primary stopes but proved unwieldily with the onset of the extraction of the secondary stopes from rib to island pillars. The St Ives Geotechnical Department therefore had to search for an alternative stability assessment method.
A Canadian stability method, Radius Factor (Milne, 1996), was investigated and subsequently trialled. Whilst Hydraulic Radius as considered in the Stability Graph method is based on boundary geometry (length x width), the Radius Factor method is based on surface geometry. Two new terms were introduced to site personnel, Radius Factor (RF) is related to the overall stability and maximum deformation of a surface and Effective Radius Factor (ERF) is related to the local stability and deformation of a point on the stope surface.
The method was trialled firstly as a tool to back analyse old stoping areas. Back analysis showed the method to be effective for determining maximum stable spans. The method was then used as a design tool for determining maximum spans and pillar placement in the mine design.
The Radius Factor method was continually calibrated to actual mine results over the life of the mine. This calibration enabled stope geometry and sequencing changes to incorporate best geotechnical practice into the mine extraction sequence. As a result the St Ives geotechnical and mining teams were able to safely extend two stope lengths and extract one central pillar resulting in an extra 404 kg.
Barsanti, B.J. and Andrews, P.G. (2006) New stability assessment methods at the Conqueror mine, St Ives Gold Mine. Proceedings 7th Young Geotechnical Professionals Conference. Adelaide, Australia.
Barton, N., Lien, R. and Lunde, J. (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech., May, pp. 189–236.
Clark, L. and Pakalnis, R. (1997) An Empirical Design Approach for Estimating Unplanned Dilution from Open Stope Hangingwalls and Footwalls. Presented at the 99th AGM-CIM, Vancouver, p. 25.
International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM) (1981) Rock characterisation testing and monitoring. ISRM Suggested Methods, E.T. Brown (editor), Commission on Testing Methods, Pergamon Press, London, p. 211.
Mathews, K.E., Hoek, E., Wyllie, D.C. and Stewart, S.B.V. (1981) Prediction of stable excavations for mining at depth below 1000 metres in hard rock. CANMET Report DSS Serial No. OSQ80-00081, DSS File No. 17SQ.23440-0-9020, Ottawa, Dept. Energy, Mines and Resources, p. 39.
Milne, D.M., Pakalnis, R. and Lunder, P. (1996) Approach to the quantification of hangingwall behaviour. Transactions of the Institute Of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 105, A1–80, pp. A69–74.
Milne, D.M. and Pakalnis, R. (1997) Theory behind empirical design techniques. Proceedings 12th colloque en controle de terrain, Assoc. Min, Quebec.
Milne, D.M. (1997) Underground Design and Deformation based on surface geometry. PhD thesis, The University of British Columbia.
Nickson, S. (1992) Cable support guidelines for underground hard rock mine operations. Masters Thesis, University of British Columbia.
Pakalnis, R., Nickson, S., Lunder, P., Clark, L., Milne, D. and Mah, P. (1996) Empirical Methods for the Design of Mine Structures. Proceedings 11th colloque en controle de terrain, Assoc. Min, Quebec.
Potvin, Y., Hudyma, M.R. and Miller, H.D.S. (1989) Design guidelines for open stope support. CIM Bulletin, 82, (926), pp. 53–62.