Authors: Poropat, GV


DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/808_123

Cite As:
Poropat, GV 2008, 'Remote Characterisation of Surface Roughness of Rock Discontinuities', in Y Potvin, J Carter, A Dyskin & R Jeffrey (eds), SHIRMS 2008: Proceedings of the First Southern Hemisphere International Rock Mechanics Symposium, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 447-458, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/808_123

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The roughness of a discontinuity may be an important factor influencing shear strength of the discontinuity. Determining the roughness of a discontinuity surface and providing a numerical measure of the roughness generally requires considerable effort. The development of new, easily accessible tools for 3D imaging has provided effective fast and accurate means of creating 3D surface models from which roughness measurements can be readily obtained. These new techniques are versatile enough to enable a user to measure roughness along any desired profile and at any resolution up to the limit of the spatial subtense of an image pixel on the discontinuity surface. This paper reviews the use of 3D imaging for the measurement of roughness and provides some examples of the measurements.

References:
Baker, B.R., Gessner, K., Holden, E. and Squelch, A. (2008) Automatic detection of anisotropic features on rock surfaces, Geosphere; April 2008; Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 418–428.
Barnsley, M.F. (1988) Fractals everywhere, Academic Press London, UK.
Egger, P. and Grasselli, G. (2003) Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 40, pp. 25–40.
Gentier, S., Riss, J., Archambault, G., Flamand, R. and Hopkins, D.L. (2000) Influence of fracture geometry on sheared behavior, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts 37, pp. 161–74.
Grasselli, G., Wirth, J. and Egger, P. (2002) Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 789–800.
Haneberg, W.C. (2006) Measurement and Visualization of Directional Rock Surface Profiles Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric or Laser Point Clouds, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 2006.
Haneberg, W.C. (2007) Directional roughness profiles from three-dimensional photogrammetric or laser scanner point clouds, Proceedings 1st Canada-U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, Vancouver, 27–31 May, pp. 101–106.
ISRM Commission on Standardization of Laboratory and Field Tests (1978) Suggested Methods for the Quantitative Description of Discontinuities, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics, Vol. 15, pp. 319–368.
Kulatilake, P.H.S.W. and Um, J. (1999) Requirements for accurate quantification of self-affine roughness using the roughness-length method, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 36, pp. 5–18.
Maerz, N.H., Franklin, J.A. and Bennett, C.P. (1990) Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics. Abstracts, 27(5), pp. 329–343.
Malinverno, A. (1990) A simple method to estimate the fractal dimension of a self-affine series, Geophysics Research Letters, Vol. 17, pp. 1953–1956.
Mandelbrot, B. (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature W.H Freeman
Rahman, Z., Slob, S. and Hack, R. (2006) Deriving roughness characteristics of rock mass discontinuities from terrestrial laser scan data, IAEG2006 Paper number 437.
Tse, R. and Cruden, D.M. (1979) Estimating joint roughness coefficients, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts., 16, pp. 303–307.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au