Burke, A 2008, 'Creating a Positive Legacy in a Biodiversity Hotspot', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, I Weiersbye & P Dye (eds), Mine Closure 2008: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Mine Closure
, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 377-384, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/852_34
Placed in one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots, the Succulent Karoo Biome, and a emerging National
Park, Namdeb Diamond Corporation faces the challenge now to contribute significantly to Namibia’s
economy, while committed to preparing the land for a future land use. Rehabilitating 100 years of mining
legacy which created one of the world’s largest mining footprints, is no trivial task. The magnitude of the
rehabilitation is enormous, as waste accumulated within the main mining area which is fenced because of
security concerns, and to date very little redundant infrastructure has been demolished and disposed off.
Thus disposal procedures must be developed which meet legal standards, and, where feasible, international
best practice, while taking the remoteness of the sites into account. In terms of footprint, Namdeb’s is by far
the largest of the De Beers mines, with the largest part of the footprint composed of excavated areas,
overburden and tailings dumps. A pragmatic approach, taking into account future land use, the needs of the
environment, legal requirements and stakeholder views, has resulted in an achievable environmental
rehabilitation plan which is presently being implemented. The major rehabilitation tasks can be divided into
practical categories for implementation, namely: infrastructure, pollution, landscape and biodiversity.
A rehabilitation plan was developed based on a rehabilitation framework, and a programme is currently
being compiled, outlining time frames and budgets for individual tasks. Rehabilitation tasks include
demolition of redundant infrastructure, clean-up of all historic pollution and waste sites, reshaping of
unstable and visually unacceptable landforms and re-vegetating in priority areas. Close to 20% of the mine
footprint is proposed to be re-shaped. Regrowth indicates that natural recovery of disturbed areas is
underway and interventions related to landscaping and re-vegetating can focus on key areas of importance
to conservation and future tourism. Closure costing, development of completion criteria and rehabilitation
monitoring and evaluation are on-going tasks which require regular review. In order to achieve
sustainability for the mining town of Oranjemund, developments independent of mining are being
investigated and encouraged. A social programme is being developed to support the change from mining to
alternative employment. Land-use suggestions range from tourism-based mine and Sperrgebiet tours and
resort facilities, to mariculture in mined-out ponds, and irrigation farming along the Orange River. These
developments will need to be aligned with the vision for the future Sperrgebiet National Park and
discussions and debate between various stakeholders is on-going. This paper discusses the strategy, process
and way forward sharing the lessons learnt with practitioners in the mining sector facing similar challenges
ANZMEC (2000) Strategic framework for mine closure. Australian and New Zealand Minerals and Energy Council and
Minerals Council of Australia.
Buonopane, M., Huenneke, L.F. and Remmenga, M. (2001) Community response to removals of plant functional
groups and species from a Chihuahuan Desert shrubland. Oikos, 110, pp. 67-80.
Burke, A. and Mannheimer, C. (2004) Plant species of the Sperrgebiet (Diamond Area 1). Dinteria, 29, pp. 79-109.
Burke, A. (2004) A preliminary account of patterns of endemism in Namibia's Sperrgebiet, succulent karoo. Journal of
Biogeography, 31, pp. 1613-1622.
Burke, A. (in press) Recovery in naturally dynamic environments – A case study from the Sperrgebiet, southern African
arid succulent karoo. Environmental Management, in press.
Burke, A. (2007) Eleven steps to rehabilitation in the Succulent Karoo and Namib Desert. EnviroScience and Namibia
Nature Foundation, Oranjemund and Windhoek, 24 p.
Burke, A., Cooper, T. and Noli, D. (2004) Initial results determining spatial and temporal patterns of rainfall in the
Sperrgebiet, south-west Namibia. Journal of the Namibia Scientific Society, 52, pp. 117-122.
Creating a Positive Legacy in a Biodiversity Hotspot A. Burke
De Beers (2001) De Beers guidelines for establishing closure costs – rates revised 2001. De Beers Family of
dos Santos, R., Citadini-Zanette, V., Leal-Filho, L.S. and Hennies, W.T. (2007) Spontaneous vegetation on overburden
piles in the coal basin of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Restoration Ecology. Doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00309.x.
EPA (2006) Environmental Protection Authority. Environmental Offsets. Position Statement No. 9, January 2006.
Fleury, A. and Parsons, A.S. (2006) Financial assurance for mine closure and reclamation. Mine closure 2006, A.B.
Fourie and M. Tibbett (eds), Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 43-49.
Foster, D., Swanson, F., Aber, J., Burke, I., Brokaw, N., Tilman, D. and Knapp, A. (2003) The importance of land-use
legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience 53, pp. 77-88.
Golder Associates (2004) Guideline document for the evaluation of the quantum of closure-related financial provision
provided by a mine. Report to Department of Minerals and Energy, Government of the Republic of South Africa.
Pretoria, South Africa.
Griffin, M. (1993) Mammals, amphibians and reptiles of Diamond Area 1. Report to Namdeb, Oranjemund.
ICMM (2003) ICMM Principles. International Council on Mining and Metals. www.icmm.com/icmm_principles.php.
ICMM (2006) Financial closure for mine closure and reclamation. International Council on mining and Metals.
IFC (2006) 2005 Sustainability Report. International Finance Corporation. Washington.
Marais, E. (1993) Insects of the Sperrgebiet - Karas Region, Namibia. Specialist baseline study for Namdeb,
MET (2007) Ministry of Environment and Tourism. Draft Sperrgebiet Park Management Plan. Government of the
Republic of Namibia, Windhoek.
MSBP (2008) Kew Magazine, Spring 2008, pp. 30-33.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B. and Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for
conservation priorities. Nature 403, pp. 853-858.
Peterson, G., Allen, R. and Holling, C.S. (1998) Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1, pp. 6-18.
Richards, D. (2005) Biodiversity performance measures – their role in Rio Tinto. Presentation at EarthWatch Institute
Workshop, RGS London EarthWatch Institute Workshop, RGS London,
Roos, L. (2008) Summary of De Beers - Marine Biodiversity workshop, Cape Town, April 2008.
SER (2005) Society for Ecological Restoration International, Guidelines for developing and managing ecological
restoration projects. 2nd edition. www.ser.org.
SPAN (2007) Strengthening the Protected Area Network (SPAN) Project. Directorate of Parks and Wildlife
Management, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia.
Suhartoyo, H., Mulligan, D.R. and Doley, D. (2006) Evaluating rehabilitation of sand mined sites at Tomago, NWS –
Measuring success and its criteria. Mine closure 2006, A.B. Fourie and M. Tibbett (eds), Australian Centre for
Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 781-790.
Sustainable Asset Management (2008) Creating sustainable value.
Watson, A.H. (2006) Better closure cost estimates. Mine closure 2006, A.B. Fourie and M. Tibbett (eds), Australian
Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 493-497.