Authors: Gerth, A; Hebner, A

Paper is not available for download
Contact Us


Cite As:
Gerth, A & Hebner, A 2008, 'The Potential of Plants in Constructed Wetlands for the Removal of Contaminants from Mine Water in Germany', in AB Fourie, M Tibbett, I Weiersbye & P Dye (eds), Mine Closure 2008: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 599-605,

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero

The importance of marsh plants for pollutant removal in passive biological water treatment systems, constructed wetlands, at two mining locations in Germany was investigated. The aim of this investigation was to identify the fate of metals and radionuclides in eight small-scale, and one pilot-scale, constructed wetlands on different uranium mine sites. The plant material (roots, shoots, and plant residues) was analyzed at different times during the pilot run. Furthermore, the effect of plant fertilizer on contaminants accumulation by plants and the release of contaminants from plant shoots and leaves, back into the mine water, was investigated. Plants had a significant effect on arsenic, uranium and radium separation, as well as on the dissolved oxygen content, redox potential and pH of the effluent of the pilot systems. Site-specific differences in the efficiency of the tested helophyte species (Phragmites australis, Carex disticha, Typha latifolia, and Juncus effusus) on contaminant removal were identified. At one of the investigated mining sites, arsenic, uranium, radium, manganese and iron had to be removed before discharge of the seepage into a nearby stream. The plant biomass was analyzed five times over a period of 30 months. Phytoaccumulation resulted in the removal of 17,500 mg/kg of iron, 930 Bq/kg of radium, 610 mg/kg of manganese, 360 mg/kg of arsenic and 30 mg/kg of uranium in dry plant matter, especially roots, after this operation time. At a second uranium mining site, an extensive research programme on the treatment efficiency, robustness and long-term stability of a constructed wetland was carried out, focusing on the biological separation of arsenic and uranium. A pilot-scale constructed wetland was designed and built with four serially-connected ponds (total surface area of 1400 m²). For the effective separation of uranium and arsenic, different redox conditions were needed. A carbon source was added to establish anaerobic conditions for the reduction of uranium in the first two ponds. In the third pond, the water was enriched with oxygen to reach aerobic conditions for the removal of arsenic. A concentration of 0.3 mg/L of uranium, and less than 50 µg/L of arsenic in the effluent, could be reached. After two years of operation, samples were taken from the helophytes in all ponds. The highest uranium concentrations (about 386 ppm of dry mass) were found in the aerial plant parts of the plants in the first pond. Arsenic was accumulated in the roots of plants growing in the last aerobic ponds, to a maximum concentration of 195 ppm of dry mass.

BfS (2001) Informationen des Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz. BfS aktuell 1/01, 4, Jahrgang, March.
Chang, Y.-J., Peacock, A.D., Long, P.E., Stephen, J.R., McKinley, J.P., Macnaughtin, S.J., Anwar Hussain, A.K.M.,
Saxton, A.M. and White, D.C. (2001) Diversity and Characterization of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in
Groundwater at a Uranium Mill Tailings Site. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 67, No. 7,
pp. 3149-3160.
Gerth, A., Hebner, A., Kießig, G., Zellmer, A. (2005) Passive Treatment of Minewater at the Schlema-Alberoda Site.
B.J. Merkel, A. Hasche-Berger (eds), Uranium in the Environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,
pp. 409-414, ISBN 3-540-28363-3
Hagen, M. (2006) 15 Jahre Wismut GmbH – ein Rückblick auf die erfolgreiche Sanierung der Hinterlassenschaften des
Uranerzbergbaus in Sachsen und Thüringen Site. Bergmännische Tage, 10, Schlema, Germany, June/July.
Higgins, J. and Whitford, J. (2003) The use of engineered wetlands to treat mine drainage. The rehabilitation of
industrial wasteland and post-mining landscapes, Görlitz, Germany, 12 April.
Kießig, G. and Hermann, E. (2000) Follow-up Solutions to the Conventional Treatment of Contaminated Water.
International Conference WISMUT 2000 – Mine Rehabilitation, Schlema, Germany, July.
Kiessig, G., Kunze, C., Küchler, A., Zellmer, A. Meyer, J. and Kalin, M. (2004) Kostengünstige passive
Nachsorgelösungen mit einem Constructed Wetland auf der Grundlage von Prognosen der Entwicklung des
Flutungswassers der Grube Pöhla-Tellerhäuser. Treatment Technologies for Mining Impacted Water, Berg- und
Hüttenmännischer Tag, 55, Freiberg, Germany, Juni, 2004.
Küchler, A., Kiessig, G. and Kunze, C. (2005) Passive biological treatment systems of mien waters a WISMUT sites,
9th International Mine Water Congress, Oviedo, Spain, September.
Kuschk, P., Wiesner, A., Buddhawong, S., Stottmeister, U. and Kästner, M. (2006) Effectiveness of differently
designed small-scale constructed wetlands to decrease the acidity of acid mine drainage under field conditions.
Engineering Life Science, 6 (4), pp. 394-398.
Limpitlaw, D. (1996) Sediments as indicators of wetland efficacy in ameliorating acid mine drainage. Journal of the
South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, December.
Lloyd, J.R., Klessa, D.A., Parry, D.L. and Brown, N.L. (2004) Stimulation of microbial sulphate reduction in a
constructed wetland: microbial and geochemical analysis. Water Research 38, pp. 1822-1830.
Mkandawire, M. and Dudel, E.G. (2005) Accumulation of arsenic in Lemna gibba L. (duckweed) in tailing waters of
two abandoned uranium mining sites in Saxony, Germany. Science of the Total Environment, 336, pp. 81-89.
Schöner, A., Sauter, M. and Büchel, G. (2004) Untersuchungen zur Rückhaltung von Uran in Wetlands. Treatment
Technologies for Mining Impacted Water, Berg- und Hüttenmännischer Tag, 55, Freiberg, Germany.
Wolkersdorfer, C. and Younger, P.L. (2002) Passive Grubenwasserreinigung als Alternative zu aktiven Systemen.
Grundwasser – Zeitschrift der Fachsektion Hydrologie 2/2002.

© Copyright 2022, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries or error reports to