Authors: Smith-Boughner,LT; Urbancic, TI; Baig, AM
Show More
Download Paper
Open access courtesy of:

Citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero

In this paper, we describe the seismicity associated with the excavation of a stope inside a sill pillar in a North American hard rock mine. By taking a continuum approach to describing the microseismicity, we reconstruct the deformation state of the rock mass during production and production. Microseismic events are generated through dynamic changes to the stress in the rock mass. While an individual microseismic event corresponds to slip on a discrete surface, the combined deformation of a group of events results in a collective behaviour. The combined deformation is quantified using a dynamic parameter representation and allows us to gain additional insight into the behaviour of the rock mass through incorporation of stress and energy release, and spatio-temporal relationships of observed seismicity. It provides a quantitative framework for relating changes in the intensity, concentration and rate of seismicity to changes in the rock mass. In this paper, we show that the bulk of an elastic deformation, for the most part, follows spatially around the major blast locations. Using these tools and seismic moment tensor data for these events, we track changes in the strength of the rock mass in the hours and days following the blasting of a stope. The stresses in the stope are relieved through the excavation and shed to the surrounding rock mass. The timing and mechanism for this stress transfer varies near faults or close to other structural boundaries. Depending on the nature of the interface, the change in the collective behaviour could be a change in the event rate, inter-event distance or energy release of the observed seismicity. Based on our observations, we suggest that the application of dynamic parameters to characterise the seismicity associated with mine design can be used to better characterise the stress state, fracture state and deformation state/evolution of a rock mass. Keywords: microseismicity, rock mass characterisation, stress

Keywords: microseismicity, rock mass characterisation, stress

Smith-Boughner,LT, Urbancic, TI & Baig, AM 2017, 'Resolving sill pillar stress behaviour associated with blasts and rockbursts', in J Wesseloo (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 257-267.

Ben-Zion, Y 2008, ‘Collective behavior of earthquakes and faults: Continuum‐discrete transitions, progressive evolutionary changes, and different dynamic regimes’, Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 46, no. 4.
Hudson, JA, Pearce, RG & Rogers, RM 1989, ‘Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 94, no. B1, pp. 765–774.
Hobbs, BE, Mühlhaus, HB & Ord, A 1990, ‘Instability, softening and localization of deformation’, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 143–165.
Kanamori, H 1983 ‘Magnitude scale and quantification of earthquakes’, Tectonophysics, vol. 93, no. 3–4, pp. 185–199.
Kostrov, VV 1974, ‘Seismic moment and energy of earthquakes, and seismic flow of rocks’, Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, no. 1, English translation, pp. 23–44.
McGarr, A 1999 ‘On relating apparent stress to the stress causing earthquake slip’, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 104, pp. 3003–3011.
Mendecki, AJ 1997, ‘Quantitative seismology and rock mass stability’, in AJ Mendecki (ed.), Seismic Monitoring in Mines, Chapman and Hall, pp. 178–219.
Savage, JC & Wood, MD 1971, ‘The relation between apparent stress and stress drop’, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1381–1388.
Trifu, C-I, Angus, D & Shumila, V 2000, ‘A fast evaluation of the seismic moment tensor for induced seismicity’, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 1521–1527.
Vavryčuk, V 2001, ‘Inversion for parameters of tensile earthquakes’, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, vol. 106, no. B8, pp. 16339–16355.

© Copyright 2017, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries to or error reports to