Authors: Louchnikov, V; Sandy, MP
Show More
Download Paper
Open access courtesy of:

Citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
A growing number of underground mines experience high seismic activity due to the expansion of the mined out void and the progressive advancement of the operations to greater depths. Seismic events with a local magnitude ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 are routinely recorded at various mines in Western Australia where many such events have resulted in rockbursts damaging underground excavations and posing a high risk of injury to underground workers. Being the last line of defence in mitigating the risk of a rockburst occurrence, an optimal ground support system must be sufficiently robust to survive the highest magnitude event predicted by seismological analysis, yet still be economically and practicably feasible to ensure sustainability of the mining operation. This paper presents the process of ground support selection as applied to two Western Australian hard rock mines experiencing rockbursting conditions. The methodology is presented in the format of the capacity meeting the demand. Various commercially available rockbolts and surface liners are reviewed in terms of their energy absorption and deformation capacities. Once all data on the demand and capacity is in hand, the task of selecting an optimal support is then a matter of ranking the systems, shortlisting the better ones for a trial, and finally deciding on the most optimal one or two. Keywords: rockburst, dynamic ground support, optimisation

Keywords: rockburst, dynamic ground support, optimisation

Citation:
Louchnikov, V & Sandy, MP 2017, 'Selecting an optimal ground support system for rockbursting conditions', in J Wesseloo (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 613-623.

References:
Balg, C & Roduner, A 2013, ‘Geobrugg AG: ground support applications’, presentation at the Geobrugg’s International Ground Support Conference, Walenstadt, Switzerland, 11–13 September 2013.
Bucher, R, Cala, M, Zimmermann, A, Balg, C & Roth, A 2013, ‘Large scale field tests of high‐tensile steel wire mesh in combination with dynamic rock bolts subjected to rockburst loading’, in Y Potvin & B Brady (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth,
pp. 221–232.
Kaiser, PK, McCreath, DR & Tannant, DD 1996, Canadian Rock Burst Support Handbook, Canadian Mining Industry Research Organization, Sudbury, Ontario.
Morton, EC, Thompson, AG & Villaescusa, E 2008, ‘Static testing of shotcrete and membranes for mining applications’, in TR Stacey & D Malan (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Civil Engineering Construction, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg.
Morton, EC, Villaescusa, E & Thompson, AG 2009, ‘Determination of energy absorption capabilities of large scale shotcrete panels’, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Shotcrete for Underground Support, Davos, Switzerland.
Player, JR, Morton, EC, Thompson, AG & Villaescusa, E 2008, ‘Static and dynamic testing of steel wire mesh for mining applications of rock surface support’, in TR Stacey & D Malan (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Civil Engineering Construction, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg.
Potvin, Y, Wesseloo, J & Heal, D 2010, ‘An interpretation of ground support capacity submitted to dynamic loading’, Mining Technology, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 233–245.




© Copyright 2017, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
Please direct any queries to or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au