Geotechnical risk management for open pit mine closure: a sub-arctic and semi-arid case study

Authors: de Graaf, PJH; Desjardins, M; Tsheko, P

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_18_de_Graaf

Cite As:
de Graaf, PJH, Desjardins, M & Tsheko, P 2019, 'Geotechnical risk management for open pit mine closure: a sub-arctic and semi-arid case study', in AB Fourie & M Tibbett (eds), Mine Closure 2019: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 211-234, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_rep/1915_18_de_Graaf

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
De Beers is currently developing closure plans for two open pit mines. At first glance they appear quite similar; both are relatively remote, have operated for 10 years, have similar pit dimensions (250–300 m deep and 1.5 km wide) and have Palaeozoic sedimentary host lithologies with weak upper units overlying more competent lower materials. However, Victor Mine in the sub-Arctic Canada, is one of De Beers wettest mines (dewatering volume of 75,000 m3/d) and is hosted predominantly in good quality limestone with excellent final wall performance. While Voorspoed Mine, in semi-arid Southern Africa required virtually no dewatering, has poor wall performance associated many with mudstone and country rock breccia instabilities. Victor Mine is expected to achieve stable pit lake in less than 10 years (and less than 2 years with supplementation from a nearby river), while Voorspoed will take over 100 years to reach ultimate pit lake level (due to low groundwater inflows, high evaporation and limited opportunity for flow supplementation). This paper describes a process to determine closure stability design acceptance criteria (DAC) and characterise the zone of long-term surface disturbance surrounding the pit (i.e.: potentially unstable pit edge zone to define the closure exclusion zone). This involved: These results along with the well documented historical slope performance provided the basis for detailed Geotechnical Risk Assessments which addressed two periods. Risk-based monitoring plans were developed along with Trigger Action Response Plans (TARPs) to ensure that closure of the pit proceeds safely and efficiently while satisfying the regulatory requirements.

Keywords: design acceptance criteria, Geotechnical risk management, pit slope closure, safe setback distance

References:
Adams, BM 2015, ‘Slope Stability Acceptance Criteria for Opencast Mine Design’, Proceedings of the 12th Australia New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics, Wellington.
Agricola, G 1556, De Re Metallica [Subject Metals], Dover Publications, New York, pp. 638.
Brown, ET & Ferguson, GA 1979, ‘Progressive Hangingwall Caving at Gath’s Mine, Rhodesia’, Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 88, pp. A92–105.
Carter, TG 1992, ‘A New Approach to Surface Crown Pillar Design’, Proceedings of the 16th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Canadian Rock Mechanics Association, Sudbury, pp. 75–83.
Carter, TG 2014, ‘Guidelines for use of the Scaled Span Method for Surface Crown Pillar Stability Assessment’, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Applied Empirical Design Methods in Mining, International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Lima.
Carter, TG & Miller, RJ 1995, ‘Crown Pillar Risk Assessment – Cost Effective Measures for Mine Closure Remediation Planning’, Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 104, pp. A41–A57.
de Graaf, P, Johnson, R & Beale, G 2018, Victor Mine – 2018 Geotechnical Review Board Report, unpublished.
Department of Industry and Resources 1997, Safety Bund Walls Around Abandoned Open Pit Mines Guideline, Government of Western Australia.
Desjardins, M 2018, Victor Mine De Beers Canada Inc. Geotechnical Closure Report, Internal Report, unpublished.
Ekkerd, J, Tsheko, P & Ruest, M 2018, ‘Voorspoed Mine, South Africa: Open Pit Diamond Mining in Weak Mudrock’, in D Martin & P Stacey (eds), Guidelines for open pit slope design in weak rocks, CSIRO Publishing, Clayton.
Flores, G & Karzulovic, A 2002, Geotechnical Guidelines for a Transition from Open Pit to Underground Mining, Benchmarking Report for ICSII, Task 4.
Hawley, PM & Cunning, J 2017, Guidelines for Mine Waste Dump and Stockpile Design. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.
Hoek, E 1974, ‘Progressive Caving Induced by Mining an Inclined Orebody’, Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 83, pp. A133–139.
Laubscher, DH 2000, Block Caving Manual, Prepared for International Caving Study, JKMRC and Itasca Consulting Group, Brisbane.
McCullough, CD & Schultze, M 2018, Risks and Rewards of Pit Lakes, AusIMM Bulletin, December 2018, pp. 38–41.
National Coal Board 1975, Subsidence Engineers Handbook, 2nd edn, National Coal Board Mining Department, London.
Ontario Mines Regulation 2000, Regulation 240/00: Mine Development and Closure under Part VII of the Act.
Read, J & Stacey, P 2009, Guidelines for Open Pit Slope Design, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.
Rougier, M, Ruest, M, Gauthier, P & Horwitz, A 2015, ‘The use of head drilling and of structural data from digital photography obtained by drone survey to justify slope steepening at Victor Diamond Mine’, Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Cape Town.
Sainsbury, B, Sainsbury, D & Diana, C 2018, ‘Back-analysis of PC1 cave propagation and subsidence behaviour at the Cadia East mine’, in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 167–178.
Salamon, MDG 1990, ‘Mechanism of caving in longwall coal mining’, in W Justrulid & G Johnson (eds), Proceedings of the 31st U.S Symposium of Rock Mechanics, AA Balkema, Rotterdam.
Sharrock, G, Brunton, I & Hebert, Y 2016, Design Charts: Subsidence Drawzones & Caveability, Itasca Australia Confidential Report MMT-3 Sponsors.
Suchowerska Iwanec, AM, Carter, JP & Hambleton, JP 2015, ‘Geomechanics of subsidence above single and multi-seam coal mining’, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 304313.
Tsheko, P, Muthelo, N & Ratshitanga, M 2019, Voorspoed Mine Geotechnical Closure Report, Internal Report, unpublished.
van As, A, Davison, J & Moss, I 2003, Subsidence Definitions for Block Caving Mines, Rio Tinto Technical report.




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au