Authors: Morkeh, J; Cefalo, J; Robertson, K

Open access courtesy of:

DOI https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2025_102

Cite As:
Morkeh, J, Cefalo, J & Robertson, K 2020, 'Optimisation of crest blasting and excavation techniques for controlling spillover at Bingham Canyon Mine', in PM Dight (ed.), Slope Stability 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 1483-1494, https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2025_102

Download citation as:   ris   bibtex   endnote   text   Zotero


Abstract:
The height of the south wall at Bingham Canyon mine, running east to west, ranges between 100 m to 400 m tall. This wall, which is currently being mined down as part of the Slice 1 pushback, sits above the only haul road used to access the pit bottom – which hosts most of the mine’s ore. Consequently, rockfall from the operating mining level onto the haul road is a critical risk to the operation. Earlier reviews including rockfall simulations and rockfall barrier analysis work recommended implementing crest blasting procedures and mining with smaller hydraulic shovel to control spillover so that the rockfall control barrier on the haul road can continue to be effective. Initially, a conservative crest blasting technique was used to control spillover, however this approach posed challenges in the mining sequence and impacted overall productivity of the pushback. The blast designs and crest mining methodology were gradually adjusted following reviews of blast performance and monitoring data. This paper details the blasting-mining-spillover evaluation process and the subsequent mining operational changes that were made to improve production in the current pushback while controlling spillover.

Keywords: spillover control, rockfall control, crest blasting, crest mining

References:
Afeni, TB 2009, ‘Optimization of drilling and blasting operations in an open pit mine—the SOMAIR experience’, Mining Science and Technology (China), vol. 19, iss. 6, November 2009, pp. 736–739.
Bowa, VM 2015, ‘Optimization of blasting design parameters on open pit bench, a case study of Nchanga Open Pits’, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 4, iss. 9, September 2015.
Gibbs, J, Vetz, N & Hoover, E 2019, September 2019 Geology Mapping, Rio Tinto Kennecott Copper, South Jordan, internal communication.
Ninepence, JB, Appianing, EJA, Kansake, BA & Amoako, R 2016, ‘Optimisation of drill and blast parameters using empirical fragmentation modelling’, Proceedings of the Fourth UMaT Biennial International Mining and Mineral Conference, pp. 25–29.
Read, J & Stacey, P 2009, Guidelines for Open Pit Slope Design, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, p. 18.
Rio Tinto Kennecott Copper 2017, Post Blast Report, internal document, Rio Tinto Kennecott Copper, South Jordan.
Rio Tinto Kennecott Copper 2016, Vertically Coincidental Mining (VCM) Trigger Action Response Plan (TARP) Documentation, internal document, Rio Tinto Kennecott Copper, South Jordan.
Williams, C, Morkeh, J, Dorfschmidt, K, Poon, C, Matlashewski, P & Carvalho, J 2019, ‘Innovative rockfall solutions based on calibration and field testing’, Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, vol. 37, pp. 101–116.
Wood, D & Brya, WH 2012, Crucial Challenges to Discovery and Mining – Tomorrow’s Deeper Ore Bodies, Mining & Geology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, viewed 14 October 2019,




© Copyright 2024, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), The University of Western Australia. All rights reserved.
View copyright/legal information
Please direct any queries or error reports to repository-acg@uwa.edu.au